Goodrow was an older and worse player, and paid more.
I get what you're saying buy the Goodrow contract didnt hurt us.
I disagree, that money could have been used more efficiently and effectively.I get what you're saying buy the Goodrow contract didnt hurt us.
Kreider has to return a nhl player… or nhl ready prospect.
I really don’t care for a late 1st rounder unless we have another deal lined up
I'd be pretty surprised if they trade Kreider for another 30+ year old. We have plenty of money to retain a bit.Realistically, it's probably going to be a another veteran player with at least some money on his contract. Schenn, Laughton, Rakell type. otherwise, the rangers probably have to retain to get a young player worth getting. Not sure what Drury's appetite would be on that.
I mean the extra money he was given as a 4th liner might have helped us shore up another area of the team...so it likely did.
I'd be pretty surprised if they trade Kreider for another 30+ year old. We have plenty of money to retain a bit.
Kreider + Buch reunion?
The fact that we’ve moved both goodrow and trouba and retained zero, and actually gotten assets back, should be a clear indication that teams do still value “toughness” and “playoff experience “They have to weight the offers they get against their motivation to trade him. I would ideally be looking for a middle of the lineup player like Ryan McLeod or Morgan Geekie. I was surprised by the Lindgren trade, even if my head tells me no one wants Kreider in his current state.
He has a list of 15 teams right? He doesn’t need to waiveRealistically guys I don't think Kreider, who has spent his entire life in the northeast, is going to waive to go anywhere that isn't in the northeast or is at the most, northeast adjacent.
Maybe as far south as Washington and west as Pittsburgh/Columbus.
Just because he is playing more engaged now doesnt mean that he was unengaged during the 23-24 season. He had a down season and still ended up scoring 70+ points and was PPG in the post season.The fact he was “unengaged” for 1.5 calendar years doesn’t strike you as a problem?
and they owe us like 24 second round picksI wonder if a team like Utah would be interested in Kreider. They could use some scoring help, they have so much cap space, and the have a ton of futures and picks to trade.
Some have argued if the plan is to say goodbye to 2 of Kreider, Mika, Panarin- by the start of next season- might be easier to do one now. That said I’d be surprised if Kreider waives for anyone but Boston right nowIf the return for Kreider is equal or more over the summer don't see why Drury "rushes" to make the trade in the next 48 hours.
Wow i was counting wrong, its 3 runs not 2 you are right.The fact that we’ve moved both goodrow and trouba and retained zero, and actually gotten assets back, should be a clear indication that teams do still value “toughness” and “playoff experience “
Far more than this board does.
Kreider has scored 50 goals and makes less than 7m.
a move now is 3 full playoff runs.
I also think the blowback from the fanbase would be tremendous (not that Drury really cares about that) if a guy like Laughton was brought in to replace him. But even if that was the case its doubtful he would be traded to the Flyers directly. Would need to be a 3 team thing.I'd be pretty surprised if they trade Kreider for another 30+ year old. We have plenty of money to retain a bit.
He can only block the 15 on his NTC. So Boston isn't the only location he can go toSome have argued if the plan is to say goodbye to 2 of Kreider, Mika, Panarin- by the start of next season- might be easier to do one now. That said I’d be surprised if Kreider waives for anyone but Boston right now
We could hang on and end up with nothing if he decides to retire mid of next season . Guys with bad backs seldom ever get fully reset at this stage of his career if such is the issue.....shit happens . Get what we can get for him and move on . He can sign a one hour/day contract and retire a Ranger if it is needed down the road .Gartner. Gaborik. Callahan. Kreider. This is the way.
Literally said "non-rental" in my message. wat makes you think Drury's trading for rentals anyway? He's done nothing but trade for guys under team control and extended the one guy (Borgen) who was a UFA.
Are the teams of a limited NTC available to see somewhere? How do they know that for sure?Saw this on the Jets board and thought it was pretty funny.
“So Reilly Smith has all 7 Canadian teams on his no trade list and HE'S CANADIAN . See that's goofy if you ask me, i think some players have lost the plot.”
![]()
I think if he is moved and the return is underwhelming thats likely the case. Although with Kreider Ive always felt he was a physical unicorn. I dont think he'd just hang them up that quickly given his work ethic and determination. I think hed shut it down for a significant time and get back on the ice at some point before deciding to retire. Unless of course the doctors are advising him to.We could hang on and end up with nothing if he decides to retire mid of next season . Guys with bad backs seldom ever get fully reset at this stage of his career if such is the issue.....shit happens . Get what we can get for him and move on . He can sign a one hour/day contract and retire a Ranger if it is needed down the road .
He has a list of 15 teams right? He doesn’t need to waive
Greed .Saw this on the Jets board and thought it was pretty funny.
“So Reilly Smith has all 7 Canadian teams on his no trade list and HE'S CANADIAN . See that's goofy if you ask me, i think some players have lost the plot.”
![]()
Ah my bad, my brain read that as 'rental'.
That said, if Drury is going to trade away youth for more established long term options, I don't think the deadline will be where it happens. Gotta believe the market for those types of players will be much softer in the offseason.
Especially given that we generally jump the line to sign free agents, who wouldn't cost any assets; and Othmann's and Jones' values might be set to get a huge bump over the next couple months. Jones especially.