Speculation: Roster Building Thread: Part XVI

  • Xenforo Cloud will be upgrading us to version 2.3.5 on March 3rd at 12 AM GMT. This version has increased stability and fixes several bugs. We expect downtime for the duration of the update. The admin team will continue to work on existing issues, templates and upgrade all necessary available addons to minimize impact of this new version. Click Here for Updates
  • We're expeting server maintenance on March 3rd starting at midnight, there may be downtime during the work.
Status
Not open for further replies.
If you think they are stapled to the right side sure.

It doesn't have to be that way.

Yeah, it does. I'm not the person who says a lefty has to play on the left and righties on the right. But players just don't transition to playing their off-side later in their career than juniors/college/early-AHL time. It practically never happens and it won't happen here. If they had come up playing on the off-side? Fine.
 
DeAngelo on his off-side and in the top-4 is not ideal. Why complicate things? If he has a good season and earns a long term deal, great; He could return a very good young forward. Now if DeAngelo hits 50-60 points this might become more interesting.
 
But it usually is. More often than not, RD are RD and LD are LD. There are not that many success stories of those that switch him.
That's right, it usually is. However we have seen teams do it and have success while doing it. Is it ideal? Probably not but it's not something that should necessarily force the Rangers to keep a worse player over ADA just because of handedness. He's also said in the past he prefers playing on the left IIRC, whether he was saying that just to stick in the lineup or he really feels that way who can really say but it's something to keep in mind.
 
But it usually is. More often than not, RD are RD and LD are LD. There are not that many success stories of those that switch him.
It hasn’t even been that long since the Yandle/McDonagh and MDZ/Moore issues. Look at how Faulk is struggling in St. Louis.
 
That's right, it usually is. However we have seen teams do it and have success while doing it. Is it ideal? Probably not but it's not something that should necessarily force the Rangers to keep a worse player over ADA just because of handedness. He's also said in the past he prefers playing on the left IIRC, whether he was saying that just to stick in the lineup or he really feels that way who can really say but it's something to keep in mind.
Look, it would be silly of the coaching and management not to examine all options. But players that have switched sides, have already usually done so with some varying of success. As a point though, very few success stories.
 
It hasn’t even been that long since the Yandle/McDonagh and MDZ/Moore issues. Look at how Faulk is struggling in St. Louis.
These are not EA Sports games where you can do as you will. In real life, playing the right side or the left side is a world of difference.
 
The challenge with a lot defenseman playing the off side is you have them taking the pass at a weird angle on their forehand, or having to receive on their backhand. That’s somewhat doable if you’re a forward, but when that ability is the difference between the puck going out of the zone, or being intercepted by a pressing forward who then has momentum to take the puck the other way, most teams are very hesitant to try it.
 
The challenge with a lot defenseman playing the off side is you have them taking the pass at a weird angle on their forehand, or having to receive on their backhand. That’s somewhat doable if you’re a forward, but when that ability is the difference between the puck going out of the zone, or being intercepted by a pressing forward who then has momentum to take the puck the other way, most teams are very hesitant to try it.
I don't have much personal experience with this, but it seems particularly difficult to pick the puck off the boards when you're on the wrong side. I remember in high school they had us stop it with our skate and play it off that. Thats no way to receive a pass under pressure.
 
I don't have much personal experience with this, but it seems particularly difficult to pick the puck off the boards when you're on the wrong side. I remember in high school they had us stop it with our skate and play it off that. Thats no way to receive a pass under pressure.

That’s all correct. It is doable, in a general sense, but it is very difficult.

Most teams would pick up on that difficulty and challenge that defender more - knowing that if they can exploit the situation, there’s probably not much stopping them from a clean breakaway on the goalie.

That’s less of a concern on the power play, because of the man advantage. But 5 on 5? A lot of coaches won’t take the risk unless they have absolutely no choice. Hell, we often see that they’d rather put a forward back there than have a defenseman play their off-side.

Now having said all that, I don’t think we’re close to having to make that decision, and I don’t think they’ll rush it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Avery16
I don't have much personal experience with this, but it seems particularly difficult to pick the puck off the boards when you're on the wrong side. I remember in high school they had us stop it with our skate and play it off that. Thats no way to receive a pass under pressure.

Not necessarily a big deal to receive it on your backhand on the point but getting the puck deep forehand versus backhand is where I would make the argument, or providing a harder pass on your forehand directly to a teammate on their tape versus transitioning from backhand, to forehead to proceed to make that same play.

Personally speaking as a defenseman, if you receive a pass in the high slot as you cut in, you can get way more off of a one timer versus being on your on-side and trying to rip one. Being on your offside cutting in gives the player the ability to torque more and get more on their shot.
 
I’m taking Fox over DeAngelo every time. I keep the whole right side unless Lundkvist really proves to be better, which is hard to imagine.
 
  • Like
Reactions: belford22
It goes without saying that the odds are not in favor of Lundkvist, Fox and ADA all taking regular shifts for the Rangers at the same time.

We’ll see how progress continues, what deals are out there, and what contracts are coming down the pike.

But whoever eventually gets moved, it would be nice to deal with a higher value and thus get a better return.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad