Machinehead
HFNYR MVP
I have often been accussed of being negative, as has @DanielBrassard. I don't agree with that. I know I'm not like that and I don't think DB is like that reading his posts. I try to take things as they come and do decent analysis.Is it an overreaction? It's my opinion that January was a complete aberration.
I think it's an underreaction to just go with the status quo and expect a winning result.
This is not a contending team.
When the team has a stretch where they play better, acknowledging that fact doesn't mean one is in favor of status-quo hockey. It's not a political ideology. Almost nobody wants to continue kicking the can down the road with most of this lineup.
The key is to assess who stays and who goes. "Nuke it because I'm emotional" is not good analysis. Although we disagree on some things, I think @McRanger92 has taken a similar approach.
For example, Borgen has had a good stretch. Now it's "oh, see he can't play high in the lineup." Ok maybe he can't but it's one game. People are going back on forth on Trocheck being part of the team moving forward. Maybe he is or he isn't but that one play isn't a reason why he shouldn't be.
At the end of the day, I don't think anyone would be against it if they took a step back to get high-end talent, but they did that and they f***ed that up. So what else is there? Get rid of the problems at least. It's a start and it's very feasible. We could do it by the start of next year.
If they started playing better because they replaced one problem with NHL talent, why is that bad?