The 6 best listed players are ... You decide the criteria. I'm really looking forward to reading your votes and posts. @Dr Pepper
OP:
1. Why are you constantly making these same polls? At least if there was some logic or explanation posted behind them...
2. Why are you always tagging the same person?
Anyways - here's my votes:
1. Crosby. Best player here all-time, phenomenal career
2. Patrick Roy. Absolutely phenomenal career. Only player in history to give Gretzky a run for his money for greatest playoff performer ever
3. Beliveau. A mix of Crosby/Roy, similar career to Crosby (slightly less good), similar playoff heroics to Roy (slightly less). Ranks very high for me
4. Jagr. Phenomenal peak & prime. And also a ton of longevity to boot.
5. Hasek. I have absolutely no issue admitting he's the best goalie ever, and better than Roy at his best. Roy simply put together the better career. Better compete level in playoffs, more years, more success, etc. But, Hasek is tremendous, and #5 for me.
6. McDavid. I'm not quite sure where I rank McDavid all-time at the moment. He may not quite even be #6 here yet, but I have no doubt he will be in time, in fact I'm pretty certain he'll be #1, and possibly by a big gap. So, I'm including him too.
I think Hull needs to be in the mix here as he, Beliveau and Crosby are the leading #5 all-time player candidates among forwards. McDavid is getting very close to being in conversation.
I agree that the 2nd best d-men candidates aren't quite on the level as the best goalies and the best Non-Big 4 forwards in terms of tilting the ice for their teams during their careers.
I don't rank Hull quite as highly as some. In fact, ignoring McDavid, I usually hesitate between Ovechkin/Hasek for the last spot. I think Ovechkin is very similar to Hull, but simply has the better career now. I'd also slot Bourque next, and then Hull.
Hull wins the pound for pound debate with Ovechkin when comparing their best seasons head to head and has a more impressive playoff resume (leading playoff PPG over his career). You can rate him lower given his shortened career. I guess you can argue Jagr over him too based on that but peak/prime it should be Hull > Jagr too.
Hasek has the most compelling argument for having a peak that was Big 4-like in terms of domination vs. his peers. No other player can make that claim. Roy's playoff legacy definitely makes it hard to rate him anywhere but close to Hasek.
I don't know that Hull's playoff legacy is a diffferentiator between either Jagr or Ovechkin to be honest. All 3 were good, but none of them really have a playoff pedigree that stands out all-time vs some of the other players listed here.
YesIsn't this just asking your top 10 excluding the big 4? Or am I missing something?