But I don't care about anything on here enough for GENUINE anger, and Oli is so ridiculous there, so if you see me post that, it means "boooo, but yeah, I enjoyed it begrudgingly." At least until such a time as "splat tomato" makes it's grand debut.Not the same. That is for genuine anger at a comment. Tomato -- specifically a splat tomato -- means "boo, but yeah, I enjoyed it begrudgingly."
I want to give this post two emojis. I had to choose one. I would have also included the Olli.But I don't care about anything on here enough for GENUINE anger, and Oli is so ridiculous there, so if you see me post that, it means "boooo, but yeah, I enjoyed it begrudgingly." At least until such a time as "splat tomato" makes it's grand debut.
Iceberg Mika...all players sink once they come in contact
That's not our department.I want to give this post two emojis. I had to choose one. I would have also included the Olli.
Mods pls implement.
Plus, when Snowblind uses the Olli, he genuinely is angry.
55 crying about trade rumors is the femininization of North American Hockey. More than once now. He wants his severance pay for no championship. Ur old now go
Meanwhile, he'll shit on Kreider who I'm convinced is Adam Graves in a mask.Jfc he led his article with a comparison of Lindgren to Graves.
Meanwhile, he'll shit on Kreider who I'm convinced is Adam Graves in a mask.
Back trouble at 33!! He's Adam Graves.
Depends on how far BC goes. If the Rangers aren't in the playoffs it may not be possible. If they burn an ELC year by doing so I don't think they will anyway.If we trade Kreider for futures, I wonder the chances of seeing Perreault in that 3rd line LW spot at the end of the year
I am convinced Lindgren is gone by the TDL and replaced short term (this season) with a guy we get for like a 5th
It is also clear Drury wants to make somewhat of a splash to being in a top line forward who he likes to shape the team more towards his image
Creating offence is exactly what win games hence Rangers record over the past 10 games.At “creating offense?” Most of us consider offense to be actual scoring… So no. They may be creating offensive CHANCES, but then they are also blowing those chances. The bottom line on “creating offense” is the puck going in the net. Mika has 1 pt at 5v5 in like 10 games. If anyone is spinning the stats here it’s you. Sure, it’s more encouraging than getting no chances, but no it’s not “creating offense,” it doesn’t win games.
If Mika had started the season with how he has played since the break we would all have a different conversation right now.The numbers that actually win and lose games:
49GP 9G 20A 29PTS -24+/-
16 points at EV...
1 5v5 point in 10 games.
Yup. Right in front of our eyes.
That is not near good enough.
Iceberg Mika...all players sink once they come in contact
Smith is a ufa. Did you mean someone else?Panarin
Kreider
Smith
one of these three has to go by next year, and it should maybe be 2/3 or even 3/3. It comes down obviously to what you can get for them, how much or how little they're each giving you in the context of their respective cap hits, and how the org feels about the wings coming up.
To me the priority remains getting 1LD figured out. If retaining on Panarin to Dallas gets you Bichsel, then do it. The next need is C. If retaining on Kreider to Avs gets you Richie, do it.
So again, if we are moving Kreider, Mika, and Panarin, what the heck is the point of acquiring a 32 year old?Trade for JT. Move Kreider in a separate deal. JT improves us in every area we are lacking(PP, top 6 finishing, leadership). Mika and Panarin are also playing for their Rangers careers imo and can and should be moved this summer if the trend continues.
Canucks GM just did a big interview with their mouthpiece reporter. Tote the bandaid off the drama there and straight up said it is untenable between Pettersson and Miller. Seems like a crazy thing to put out there unless a trade is about to be done soon. This is a reporter that usually gets hand fed things to publish by the Vancouver owner even. Could very well be posturing to the fans before making a trade. I’ve mentioned how obvious it is that the Vancouver owner is obsessed with fan perception and that relation to ticket sales.
Offense that GOES IN THE NET wins games. Not fancy stat chances...Creating offence is exactly what win games hence Rangers record over the past 10 games.
If Mika had started the season with how he has played since the break we would all have a different conversation right now.
Sigh....
If any club has scouted Kreider .....then we might get a late first rounder and little else . I think it will depend on his effort or lack of it in the 4 Nation Event.....if he does well opening and closing the door to the bench /dressing room he might get that first rounder back.Kreider would get a haul.
A 1st, significant prospect, and young roster player.
I've been trying to find a good candidate for a 'hockey trade' (Kreider for a 22 minute LHD) but almost every team that needs a player like Chris also badly needs most of their blueliners. Those that don't are in rebuilding mode.
Mike Matheson has had his offensive role reduced in Montreal thanks to the gangbusters rookie season of Lane Hutson. But he's still playing almost 25 minutes a game. They wouldn't trade him, and if they did, they'd likely want Lafreniere instead.
Well I hope 31 GMs listen to Brooks and Drury does not. Lindgren for a 1st, baby! Lindgren for Buium! Lindgren for Silayev! Or my favorite deal, Lindgren inexplicably for all three.Brooks has always carried water for useless oaf defensemen.
At this point he’s trying to wish cast Lindgren into staying.
I do think an extension is off the table in that if it was going to happen it would have already. If they stay close I’d be shocked if they don’t self rent him. The coach clearly doesn’t think he’s a problem.
I hope they fall out of it enough where keeping him around isn’t an option. They can go on their miracle run post deadline when they’re 5 standard deviations better with out him.
So again, if we are moving Kreider, Mika, and Panarin, what the heck is the point of acquiring a 32 year old?