How would everyone feel if the player included was not Chmelar but instead was Edstrom? I have been thinking on this for a while and I wonder if Edstrom is the type of guy the Rangers like, but could move in the right scenario. He's 24 and has 7 points in 42 games. He's solid defensively and uses his size well. I'm not saying I would want to move him, but the Rangers appear to have a few guys developing who could fill that type of role. Perhaps the trade is:
Chytil + Edstrom + Lindgren + ________ for Miller + Desharnais
The Rangers could have been close to recalling both Sykora and Chmelar to have them both at practice and see who they like to fill that role. Both guys have been effective this year and project as bottom-6 guys.
keep Eds, Chmelar, deal Sykora
uphold the usually true adage:
the good big man usually beats the good little man
Edstrom, Chmelar have size and more upside
we unfortunately likely need to include Chytil
we should only take Desh as a backscratch concession [can't skate = useless]
Trading Edstrom to keep Chmelar would be some galaxy brain stuff and a huge mistake. One is an effective bottom 6 player already and the other would be lucky to carve out an NHL career.
see above
Don't think Chmelar vs Edstrom is what's holding the trade. Don't see much difference to be honest since I don't think Chmelar's potential is far off from Edstrom's. Is there a reason you'd like to hold on to one vs the other?
see above
Loss to Devils was addressed by replacing Galant. Loss to FL is being addressed by replacing Trouba and (expected) Lindgren and adding JTM. With healthy Fox. Not enough?
no, not enuf
also, as I've said many times
best strategy is to extend window w/mostly quality youth = more chances to compete for cup
now that said, in totality of circumstances
jtm has pros and cons and if the price is right for scraps + only small +, in this instance can get behind him coming here as a one off exception transaction supplemental to regular strategy
Rangers badly need a top 6(top line) forward who can match up with the other teams top players. Florida and Tampa series over the years showed it can't be Mika. From a hockey perspective, JT is a huge need. I dont get why everyone is on the rebuild and tank train after a bad month. Childish.
Get this deal done sooner than later.
Agree Mika is not/has demonstrated not
to be the answer
Howev, we need to be on rebuild b'c the older vet core DOES NOT DESERVE ANOTHER CRACK AT THIS
we are better off w/proper rebuild per bern
some say 1 def of insanity is doing the same thing repeatedly and expecting dif results
learn w/da bern
If we did land JT and Laf/Miller arent involved.
Would anyone here bat an eye if we called up Ottawa and offered Laf+KM for Sanderson?
Sanderson is at this point I think established even at this young on his career. Laf and KM are still a gamble for NYR and OTT. But the upside for both of them probably trumps Sanderson if they both explode.
Maybe we add Garand and they add a lower pick and we take one of their goalie contracts and bury it in HFT?
Didnt think this totaly through but your post got me thinking and im on the road. So its a quick hit for me.
I have tried that past 3 yrs, Sanderson here for something often variations including LaF
they want LaF but won't budge on Sand.
our best deal here is
Fox + earlier 2nd
for
Kleven, Pinto, Greig + later 1st