Speculation: Roster Building Thread Part XV: Trading up or down? - Mod Warning post #450

[Filthy Dangles]

Tavares is going to get double the salary and term that shattenkirk got.

He isn't worth that.

Overpaying Tavares is much much better than letting Tavares walk or trading his rights

And he's still just 27 so for at least 3-4 years, he'll still be in his prime and as productive as he is now.

 

[Trxjw]

Not sure Hamilton gets moved, but Faulk was definitely out there.

Hayes and Boston's 3rd for Faulk

Faulk for #10

Fun to speculate.

 

[NYR Viper]

Not sure Hamilton gets moved, but Faulk was definitely out there.

Hayes and Boston's 3rd for Faulk

Faulk for #10

Fun to speculate.

That would be another one that would be good. I'm in favor of getting creative to get that #10

 

[Ghost of jas]

Not sure Hamilton gets moved, but Faulk was definitely out there.

Hayes and Boston's 3rd for Faulk

Faulk for #10

Fun to speculate.

That is genius.

 

[Pavel Buchnevich]

First time on this website that @nevesis has been beat to posting breaking info from twitter.

 

[GoAwayPanarin]

That is genius.

Essentially that’s trading Hayes for a draft pick which is what we’ve heard they don’t want to do.

 

[NYR Viper]

First time on this website that @nevesis has been beat to posting breaking info from twitter.

Shattenhurt must just be a burner account for Nevesis.

 

[Inferno]

First time on this website that @nevesis has been beat to posting breaking info from twitter.

@RangerBoy beats him to the punch regularly

 

[Pavel Buchnevich]

@RangerBoy beats him to the punch regularly

But thats a different story. @RangerBoy makes the news behind the scenes, the rest of us are fans.

 

[TheTakedown]

GORTON GET ON THE PHONE!!!!

Lucic at 50% retained + Namtesnikov for the 10th. That'll free up cap space for them to sign a defenseman.

Or we can send them Staal, but I doubt he waives
Or we can send them Smith but I'm not sure he is a "quality defenseman"

 

[GregSirico]

Yeah but who could the rangers possibly move, even chiarelli isn't dumb enough to do 10 for staal.

10 and lucic.for Smith?

In all seriousness he wants a young D with speed ... any interests in a package built around Gilmour?

 

[NYR Viper]

But thats a different story. @RangerBoy makes the news behind the scenes, the rest of us are fans.

I'm still convinced RB is a computer.

I still love you RB, even if you are just a jumble of wires and boards.

 

[GregSirico]

Lucic at 50% retained + Namtesnikov for the 10th. That'll free up cap space for them to sign a defenseman.

Or we can send them Staal, but I doubt he waives
Or we can send them Smith but I'm not sure he is a "quality defenseman"

Gilmour + something?

 

[Fitzy]

Lucic at 50% retained + Namtesnikov for the 10th. That'll free up cap space for them to sign a defenseman.

Or we can send them Staal, but I doubt he waives
Or we can send them Smith but I'm not sure he is a "quality defenseman"

Smith cleared waivers, and Staal would too. They both have negative value.

 

[Trxjw]

That is genius.

Ha! I think we might have to bump the pick we add to Hayes to a 2nd, but getting another pick in the top 10 could be huge. Especially if some players start sliding.

 

[DanielBrassard]

Forget Hamilton, I wonder if we could swing Brodie, then flip him to Edmonton. Hayes for Brodie, then Brodie for the 10th. Maybe we swap Smith for Brouwer so Calgary has a LHD replacement.

 

[NYR Viper]

Or Tyson Barrie

 

[TheTakedown]

Smith cleared waivers, and Staal would too. They both have negative value.

That only leaves a 3 way.

I like Hayes For Faulk, then Faulk for the 10th

 

[Fitzy]

Makes you wonder if we could've gotten more from the Oilers for McDonagh had we waited.

 

[Webster]

You came to this conclusion before the draft/trading period/free agency based on what?

Rangers focusing on younger assets + the vets they already have.

 

[bleedblue94]

Rangers focusing on younger assets + the vets they already have.

Unless they sign zucc to an extension before the season there is no way they are naming him captain just to be in position to trade three consecutive team captains away at deadlines of their walk year.

We have no idea what this roster will look like in 3 weeks. Let's just wait for the 4th of July before we start playing these games

 

[Matt Rentfree]

Makes you wonder if we could've gotten more from the Oilers for McDonagh had we waited.

It depends - I might be wrong, but I'm pretty sure the Oilers are looking for RHD - that said, if you take handedness out of it, I don't think McD for 10 is outrageous, and we could have probably gotten a pick in the teens for Miller, but that ship has sailed.

 

[Inferno]

It depends - I might be wrong, but I'm pretty sure the Oilers are looking for RHD - that said, if you take handedness out of it, I don't think McD for 10 is outrageous, and we could have probably gotten a pick in the teens for Miller, but that ship has sailed.

I'd rather have 28 hajek and howden than 10.

 

[Off Sides]

I don't think Edmonton is going to want a player who does not have term left on his deal.

I think they want a PPQB RHD type, Shattenkirk would be the perfect fit if he did not have a clause and if the Rangers would consider moving him.

Where does Shattenkirk fit into this version of the Rangers timeline? Eventually they are going to likely move him before his contract is up anyway.

 

[Inferno]

I don't think Edmonton is going to want a player who does not have term left on his deal.

I think they want a PPQB RHD type, Shattenkirk would be the perfect fit if he did not have a clause and if the Rangers would consider moving him.

Where does Shattenkirk fit into this version of the Rangers timeline? Eventually they are going to likely move him before his contract is up anyway.

I don't think shatty for 10 is a good trade for us.

Shatty is a top 20 defenseman in the nhl...that's very poor value.