It's not illegal to be a republican... yet.He had great chemistry with Panarin, I'd be hesitant to throw that away unless it is the right deal. My real issue with him is that in today's volatile political climate, whether you agree or disagree with his point of view, he's a bit of a liability on SM being so outspoken and he's bound to say something that would unfortunately reflect poorly on the team/league.
I think he will. He may be lacking in the hockey IQ department and doesn't have the best hands, but man, he is a machine on the ice. His blend of size and speed is rare.
Agreed. I am not a huge fan of Byfield and I honestly do think Stutzle will be very close to Lafreniere's level down the road. He has an undeniable motor, and elite puck skills, but I do think it will take a year or two of adjustment and physical growth before his presence is felt. I believe Lafreniere's impact will be instant though.
I'd have a tough time turning down Stutzle, 5, and Tkachuk.
Nothing could be further from the truth. His political views have not mattered one iota to his team.He had great chemistry with Panarin, I'd be hesitant to throw that away unless it is the right deal. My real issue with him is that in today's volatile political climate, whether you agree or disagree with his point of view, he's a bit of a liability on SM being so outspoken and he's bound to say something that would unfortunately reflect poorly on the team/league.
Not a fan of how he doesnt use his size enough.
His physique should allow for some punishing hits. I see more of that from Lemieux than Gauthier
You are going to insert a clearly declining 37 year old into Strome' s spot and hope that the results stay the same?I still think we should let Strome walk or trade his rights. Then get Mikko Koivu to add a veteran presence, a fellow Finn for Kakko, and I can't imagine it costing too much.
Definitely needs to learn to do that, for sure. I don't think he realizes how gifted he is from a physical standpoint.
You are going to insert a clearly declining 37 year old into Strome' s spot and hope that the results stay the same?
I think that ship has sailed.
If he hasn't been that player up to this point, its not in his DNA and anything you get will be inconsistent and half hearted.
Totally fine. His defense is a work in progress but he has so many positives to his game I’m not gonna mention when would even dream of having a 24 year old 60 point rhd
From what Strome has shown is that he can be a perfect stop-gap. Clicks with your best player, has his game taken to a different level and allows for management to see 1) how Chytil is coming along and/or 2) what the trade market has to show for a second line center. And if you do find someone or Chytil steps up, then Strome can either center the third line or even slide to wing on the third line. $5m for 2-4 years.Yeah I don't get it.
I understand fully not wanting to give Strome a long term deal. But the obvious answer to me seems to be give him a 1 or 2 year deal and move him when/if the right time comes.
This whole 'trade strome then sign expensive replacement player' is a real two-in-the-bush thinking. No certainty that Granlund, Koivu or anyone else would click with Panarin.
I'm old and well off financially. I meet the team every year and had dinners with countless players over the years mostly because the NHL and a lot of teams have been clients of mine.I work with survey data for a living and, in this era, that's changing. Economic well being is less correlated with political leanings.
So true. Most Russians are completely non-PC and are very conservativeAdd to that, if American consumers could speak Russian, the Russian players would all be canceled.
I'm old and well off financially. I meet the team every year and had dinners with countless players over the years mostly because the NHL and a lot of teams have been clients of mine.
They're generally conservative. Even the Europeans, and especially the Russians and Americans. Canadians are about 50/50, though the guys from Alberta, Saskatchewan, and North east canada are generally conservative.
The conservative demographic in the NHL is very high.
Most come from wealthy, conservative families, and considering the cost of playing, its not surprising.
Add to that, if American consumers could speak Russian, the Russian players would all be canceled.
Totally agree on everything, the bold concerns me because all it takes is one slip from him and the hounds will jump him. They already do, but he's defend-able for now.It's not illegal to be a republican... yet.
Lots of republicans watch the NHL.
The NHL has been relatively quiet on politics compared to other leagues and theyre in a lot of conservative markets.
I dont think theyre as willing to alienate the conservative fanbase like the NFL, MLB, or NBA.
As long as he doesn't say anything racist, he'll be okay.
You are going to insert a clearly declining 37 year old into Strome' s spot and hope that the results stay the same?
Never said they do. Yet. But he toes the line. Not to get personal but I am a moderate republican (*ducks*) but in the public view it's sadly a tough position even for me to take and I'm a moderate. Whether you agree with it or not, there's a finer microscope on conservatives/trump supporters especially in liberal cities/locations, and in a purely business sense he's a bit of a potential liability. Could be the team disagrees.Nothing could be further from the truth. His political views have not mattered one iota to his team.
Also about most of them not attending or completing college.