NYR Viper
Registered User
Very few guys actually block trades though including his brother.
But he was able to pick a few spots. In this situation if he picks a few spots and those spots don’t want him the we are SOL
Very few guys actually block trades though including his brother.
You said it well. They are more than likely a lottery pick team, but another year of growth for the 'yutes of 2018, a full year of Lemieux, the additions of the obviously soft Euros like Kravstov and Kappo, plus hopefully larger samples of Hajek & Lindgren, along with another year of growth from ADA, can even make a ray of sunshine like myself get excited.e: but man who else is excited as hell to see Kravtsov and maybe Kakko next year? I know I gotta keep expectations low but seeing those two, seeing if Chytil and Andersson can take another step forward...man, the team might not be good yet but it'll be interesting as hell to watch
A name that is a bit fascinating to me is Ristolainen. He seems to be the type of player that would fit in with what Quinn and Gorton seem to be building. He also seems to have been a bit of a disappointment in Buffalo. I am not advocating a trade for him, just seeing perhaps a buy low possibility.I would love to see a trade for Zadorov. Avs might not be able to pay him and he's an absolute monster that this d corps could use.
Who is Kappo?
A name that is a bit fascinating to me is Ristolainen. He seems to be the type of player that would fit in with what Quinn and Gorton seem to be building. He also seems to have been a bit of a disappointment in Buffalo. I am not advocating a trade for him, just seeing perhaps a buy low possibility.
People still can't get Staal right, and you expect them to get Kaapo right? The fact that his last name is Kakko makes it easy to mix them up. Kappo Kaako![]()
Interesting article in the Athletic about Chicago at the #3OA pick and the historical unpredictability of how long defensemen require to develop – and the difficulty that presents with Toews and Kane at 31 and 30 years old, respectively.
Why the Blackhawks might draft yet another first-round...
If you're Chicago, would you rather draft Bowen (or Cozens/Dach/etc.) at this stage of your stars' careers... or would you rather have, say Kreider+ADA...?
Yeah, but with Kane and Toews (and Keith) all on the wrong side of 30, it's not about the future for them; it's about this year (every year). And as the article points out, whomever they pick (especially if it's Byram) is unlikely to be a major contributor in '19-'20, and potentially not in '20-'21 either. So, why not use that pick to load up on as much immediate help as you can get?Could Chicago even afford a Kreider extension? I doubt that pick would be on the table either way.
Yeah, but with Kane and Toews (and Keith) all on the wrong side of 30, it's not about the future for them; it's about this year (every year). And as the article points out, whomever they pick (especially if it's Byram) is unlikely to be a major contributor in '19-'20, and potentially not in '20-'21 either. So, why not use that pick to load up on as much immediate help as you can get?
2 months of Hayes with no salary retention was worth a 1st + Lemieux. So, what's a full year of Kreider (potentially at half price) + ADA worth...?
I don't understand this at all. How would EK's injuries not worry any signing team? That's just incredibly ignorant. Not only does he miss too many games or play through too many injured for a guy who will be paid out the teeth, but their is a clear decline in his level ever since our playoff round.
He is turning 29 this month. His last two seasons have declined in succession. He has been oft-injured the past 2 years. And he will very likely be signed until age 36. Of all the FA signings that have turned bad in recent years due to rapid declines, none is more obvious than EK.
is trouba not a UFA next summer? That means he has one year left and is a rental. Am I wrong?
Well, that's one person's opinion.Not 3OA.
is trouba not a UFA next summer? That means he has one year left and is a rental. Am I wrong?
Forget all the real talk it’s too early.
Just tell me why trouba signs anything but a one year deal.
Yeah, but with Kane and Toews (and Keith) all on the wrong side of 30, it's not about the future for them; it's about this year (every year). And as the article points out, whomever they pick (especially if it's Byram) is unlikely to be a major contributor in '19-'20, and potentially not in '20-'21 either. So, why not use that pick to load up on as much immediate help as you can get?
2 months of Hayes with no salary retention was worth a 1st + Lemieux. So, what's a full year of Kreider (potentially at half price) + ADA worth...?
Hayes route. Bet my pants on it. You guys are basing your arguments and telling me I got it wrong, when you guys got me in a place where until he signs a one year deal, you can tell me I’m wrong or whatever. But we all know, what his best option is and he’s take it so.... enough already. And if you don’t know what I mean then. What can I say to begin withWhat are you talking about? RFA's sign 5-6 year deals that eat into their UFA years all the time. Why are you assuming one year - particularly when we're talking about Winnipeg moving him this summer? The team he's being traded to would presumably do so assuming they could sign Trouba.
I’m gonna be proven right in a month or so, one year deal or he gets traded to the team he wants to sign long term with, with an extension.Short answer: Yes
Long answer: Still yes
He reaches his UFA years next summer, but it depends on what contract he signs this summer whether or not he actually is UFA next year (highly unlikely)
Hayes route. Bet my pants on it. You guys are basing your arguments and telling me I got it wrong, when you guys got me in a place where until he signs a one year deal, you can tell me I’m wrong or whatever. But we all know, what his best option is and he’s take it so.... enough already. And if you don’t know what I mean then. What can I say to begin with
Bc of trouba’s history with Winnipeg and what Hayes just did last summer In the identical situation. What don’t you understand?What are you talking about? RFA's sign 5-6 year deals that eat into their UFA years all the time. Why are you assuming one year - particularly when we're talking about Winnipeg moving him this summer? The team he's being traded to would presumably do so assuming they could sign Trouba.
Bc of trouba’s history with Winnipeg and what Hayes just did last summer In the identical situation. What don’t you understand?