Nah, McCarthy was a better player even before. He was always a 10-15 point player--only twice did he not get there, 8 in 33 and 8 in 37. Langdon was like a 1-3 point player, LOL. His best season was a low-end McCarthy seaosn. McCarthy's best years did come here, and he was given a bigger role, but that's because he could handle it. Langdon wasn't given that opportunity because he was generally awful. They were part of the same era.
I liked Langdon but he was never as good as McCarthy, who could do other things.