Thirty One
Safe is safe.
- Dec 28, 2003
- 28,981
- 24,357
I'm thinking one, yeah.How many games will Lemieux be suspended for? Shouldn’t be more than a game if we are jumping right into a 5 game series with Carolina
I'm thinking one, yeah.How many games will Lemieux be suspended for? Shouldn’t be more than a game if we are jumping right into a 5 game series with Carolina
I realize that they were an all-time great team led by TGO of course, but this was the exact formula of the Oilers dynasty.You mentioned it but that's good strategy for a team with an elite goalie. An elite goalie shouldn't have a vastly better sv% or GAA than an average goalie because he should face more shots and more high quality shots since you should be trying to trade chances to maximize the difference in the two goalies skill levels.
Can't believe some top teams don't like the format. What's the problem if it includes play-ins and byes?
I'd have no complaints if the Rangers were the points leader.
It kind of sucks for the teams close to getting a bye. They are basically in the same spot as teams 15 points below them in the standings. But you're not going to find a solution on the fly that's perfectly fair to everyone.Can't believe some top teams don't like the format. What's the problem if it includes play-ins and byes?
I'd have no complaints if the Rangers were the points leader.
In my perfectly constructed roster, I've got space for a crusty vet "lifer" defenseman. I love having a young roster, for a number of reasons. But some veteran presence is critical. Preferably one defenseman, one goalie, and one forward. Then three rest are stars and kids who'll skate through walls.I get it, but he has been a Ranger for life, and want him to go out the natural way, same as Hank. Buy out is just not a good way to go out.
Can't believe some top teams don't like the format. What's the problem if it includes play-ins and byes?
I'd have no complaints if the Rangers were the points leader.
With the bye, wouldn't they just have to win 12 plus the round robin games?I agree. There’s almost nothing changed for them. They still only need to win 16 games. There are multiple teams that would need to win 19.
With the bye, wouldn't they just have to win 12 plus the round robin games?
Oh dear. That's a bit odd. Maybe they see it as more revenue?No it's a bye before the round of 16.
Bread is to be wed. and my man looks drunk as a skunk
May 8th or August 5th?
Then again, we usually use periods to distinguish between date numbers, not /. Not sure about Russia though...I'm guessing May 8th, purely because he's from Europe
May 8th or August 5th?
Bread is to be wed. and my man looks drunk as a skunk
Why does it say 2019?
Gretzky always says if there was one game for ridiculous stakes, he wants Fuhr between the pipes.I realize that they were an all-time great team led by TGO of course, but this was the exact formula of the Oilers dynasty.
(Thing is, I don't know that Fuhr – or Moog – was really Shesty/Hank level good, so much as the forwards + Coffey were just that utterly insane.)
So don’t make them play. Simple.Some players with underlying conditions who might not be able to play:
Kaapo Kakko--diabetes, celiac disease
Max Domi--diabetes
Luke Kunin--diabetes
Brian Boyle--recent cancer treatments
Brett Pesce--asthma
I’d still take Mike for a do-or-die game.Gretzky always says if there was one game for ridiculous stakes, he wants Fuhr between the pipes.
I don’t agree. I wouldn’t want to be in the Top 4 with a cold team about to play a team that played real gamesif we were a top 4 team, we'd be pissed about having to play the meaningless round robin games. risking injury for games that don't count...and you can't really sit guys to protect them cause then they won't have played in a long time when the real series starts. its definitely a 'weird' situation for the teams getting bye