Speculation: Roster Building Thread: Part XIV (To trade or not to trade is the question)

GAGLine

Registered User
Sep 17, 2007
24,540
21,784
I'm onboard if they can sign him to an extension. Kakko is a bust and will never reach anywhere near his 2nd overall pick expectations. Is KK an NHL'er, yes, will he be an impactful one.....no. You can get guys like him anywhere, anytime moving forward. At least Jordan Greenway could provide some snarl with putting up almost the same points as KK.
Whether or not Kakko will reach his 2nd overall pick expectations is irrelevant. He's a good middle-6 player. In the right situation, he can score 60 points.

Tossing him aside because you are upset that he didn't reach his full potential seems pretty short-sighted.
 

bhamill

Registered User
Sponsor
Apr 16, 2012
4,836
6,059
Because the waive was done purposely to be claimed by teams he won't waive his clause for. This wasn't to send Goodrow to the minors if nobody claimed him, they weren't going to eat 1million while spending another million on a call-up worse than Goodrow. When big contracts/bad contracts are on waivers, they typically pass because nobody wants them and then they stay on the NHL roster, they aren't used to facilitate a movement around one blocked by the player. From all reports, Goodrow was even willing to play fair, and Drury pulled this last minute on him. If you really think about it, what good is having a M-NTC if a team can just put you on waivers for a team on that list to claim you? You may as well just get rid of it and only allow NMC. It's 100% shady. Drury using what was available to him doesn't make it not shady.
Really? It wasn't done just to get him off the team when no one (eligible) would offer ANYTHING for him? They purposefully wanted to send him somewhere he didn't want to go? Come on. When a team waives a player in this situation it's not doing so to pick a destination for the player. That is out of their control. They are merely hoping someone ANYONE takes him off their hands. If Goodrow wanted complete autonomy over where he played, he should have had that stipulated in his contract. But he would have had to give to get, so he didn't. There was ZERO unfair about this. It was completely legal and in the spirit of the contract BOTH parties signed.
The NHLPA, agents and players ALL understand that NTCs, M-NTCs and NMC are different specific clauses that offer various levels of control. Goodrow COULD have negotiated for a NMC, likely giving up some salary, or could have signed with another team that was willing to offer a NMC. He did not. He and his agent are responsible for the deal that he willingly signed. He's not a victim. He was massively underperforming his contract and for NYR it was addition by subtraction. Totally within the team's rights, and totally above board.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Atax

nsvoyageurs

Registered User
Jun 5, 2012
1,602
1,116
NS Canada
I legitimately think the room reacting poorly to a Lindgren scratch is under consideration. Lavi is afraid to further insult the players who have already quit on him. Maybe he "Maurice's" himself after Christmas.
Laviolette should tell the players to go bleep themselves. If they don't like Lindgren getting scratched, they can all get a real job for a living. Grow some balls.
 

kovazub94

Enigmatic
Aug 5, 2010
13,412
9,069
What Drury did with Goodrow and Trouba should be totally irrelevant in this discussion. If the players lose their shit over his actions and it shows on the ice, it's on those players to ask for a f***ing trade to a different setting.
Yup and play their asses off to entice a trade proposal from these different organizations.
 

kovazub94

Enigmatic
Aug 5, 2010
13,412
9,069
Yes its their REAL job... that they were doing SO badly that getting rid of them was addition by subtraction. If a team is willing to waive you, to get nothing in return for you, just to get rid of you, maybe you should look in the mirror... You are doing your real job VERY badly.
And IMO, waiving someone, without something coming back of course, is NOT getting around a NTC. It's merely exercising the contractual right of the TEAM to waive/demote you for poor performance. No different from a player refusing a trade they contractually do not have to accept.
It’s like there was never a player who got waived because of salary / cap implications and here’s Drury being an evil trailblazer…
 

kovazub94

Enigmatic
Aug 5, 2010
13,412
9,069
It is not about that. Tecnically Drury did nothing wrong but there is ways to conduct business respectfully that wont lead to the entire team quitting on you.
Reminds me of a scene from Pulp Fiction where Travolta needed a “please” and “thank you” from Mr Wolf.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: LokiDog

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad