McRanger92
Registered User
- Jun 7, 2017
- 11,560
- 21,405
Mika will absolutely be open to waiving his NMC if they move Kreider and cut his role.
lol. machinehead the master deflector.I'm not doing this.
I asked you for an example for something you said and you had none.
I'm not going to sit here and argue about the meaning of meaning about it.
You could make that argument, but if they rip it off, do nothing, and just let the cut get infected, people will rightfully be upset.The bandaid needs to be ripped off at some point. The tones the veterans set with their play this year is why these moves can't wait until the offseason.
View attachment 935375
I don't really care about the defense right now. It's 19 games. You could chalk that up to noise.
Look at the offense!!
This is pure speculation on my part, but I wouldn't be surprised if Mika was willing to waive (if he got a say on where he went).Mika will absolutely be open to waiving his NMC if they move Kreider and cut his role.
He could waive that NMC all he wants. Put it on a flag pole on the top of a mountain and let it waive in the wind. It doesn't matter because he has 5 years left on a deal paying him 8.5m. We aren't going to get any sort of a reasonable returnMika will absolutely be open to waiving his NMC if they move Kreider and cut his role.
Not me. I exploded this offseason when drury didnt do shit and people expected we would be better.
Im ready for change. Begging for the vets to be traded. Starting with the oldest member of the country club #20. The sooner we cut this rotted bait the better.
The kids need to be given the chance to lead! NOW!
i hope you all know that with vets gone, this team probably wins fewer, if not a lot fewer, games. part of the gamble is not knowing how younger players will respond on ice to major changes to a lineup, to a culture, to expectation.The bandaid needs to be ripped off at some point. The tones the veterans set with their play this year is why these moves can't wait until the offseason.
IDK I kinda get it. The Rangers have Panarin, Lafreniere, Cuylle, Berard, Othmann, Edstrom, and Perreault who have all played most of their careers at LW. The Rangers have a zillion LWs whereas even if Glass Chytil were an IronMan, the Rangers would be thin at center.I know he hasn't been himself but Kreider is a long way down the list of guys I'm comfortable trading. Like what is going on? We keep rolling Zibs out on the pp and now we wanna move one of the guys that is important to the pp. If Kreider is on the move over trouba, lindgren, Zibanejad then Drury needs to go, i cant understand this idiotic behavior
That's my impression too. I recall when Lavi stepped in KAM was supposed to watch hours of tape given to the players and basically his eyes just glazed over and he hasn't been the same since.he looked so good 2 years ago though, and the fancies had him as a very good defender. I think this new coaching staff has been a horrible fit for him
You could make that argument, but if they rip it off, do nothing, and just let the cut get infected, people will rightfully be upset.
No, but perhaps our coach & GM do.
Kreider has more value than those players. If you are trying to make an impactful trade to change the roster, someone with value needs to go. Two years remaining on the contract. $6.5M cap hit is very manageable. The Rangers have already paid off the majority of the contract.I know he hasn't been himself but Kreider is a long way down the list of guys I'm comfortable trading. Like what is going on? We keep rolling Zibs out on the pp and now we wanna move one of the guys that is important to the pp. If Kreider is on the move over trouba, lindgren, Zibanejad then Drury needs to go, i cant understand this idiotic behavior.
Zibanejad is a problem, Lindgren is a problem, Trouba is a problem. If you can get a center out of any combination of trade for them we'd be better. Mancini takes Troubas spot, anyone takes Lindgren. Kreider isn't near the biggest problem.
If Kreider is traded won't be happy. Dude is not the only one struggling now. Far from it.
It is nothing if it's just a shakeup move. At this point, either reset or don't. Trading one vet just to do it is actually nothing.Im not sure what you mean by this. Trading a respected vet isnt nothing. If the idea is to move out the dead weight and play the kids more, idk how anyone could be upset by that. You've said it yourself and we agree, the team isnt good enough as currently constructed. Kreider is on borrowed time no matter what. He has been since Tkachuk made a mockery of him in the ECF.
It is nothing if it's just a shakeup move. At this point, either reset or don't. Trading one vet just to do it is actually nothing.
Uh oh. Is there an incoming asteroid - or what? RB and me are in total agreement and both of us sense what is to come. The game tonight will have very large significance for certain people. 4 sure
Yes. I'd be happier if the worse players were moved out. You got me.I think you are only saying that because one of the vets in question is Kreider. If Trouba or Mika was moved we'd be throwing a parade. The Rangers have an abundance of wingers who are not 34 years old and in the midst of a massive falloff.
Yes but Trouba and Mika are harder to move .Yes. I'd be happier if the worse players were moved out. You got me.
Kreider being the one to be moved reeks of doing something just to say they did something.
If you move Kreider, also move Trouba, Lindgren, and Zibanejad because they all suck.
You have understood my point.