- Jan 18, 2012
- 35,244
- 53,882
On 2nd thought I’d be OK with
Cuylle Wennberg Kakko
But that keeps kreider Zibs together
Cuylle Wennberg Kakko
But that keeps kreider Zibs together
On 2nd thought I’d be OK with
Cuylle Wennberg Kakko
But that keeps kreider Zibs together
Think Eberle was the right move for RW. I don’t think I would be going for a winger with term in generalRe Vatrano -
He’s got 16 even strength goals and 11 on the PP, couple shorties. He’s shooting a hot 15.2%. He shoots a ton as we know.
We all know he’s on every teams list, the history here and that he’s got another year of term which is attractive.
Were the metrics dog shit with Kreider and Mika when he was here?
Besides the fact of cost being too high, what’s the reasoning so many here are turned off by acquiring the player?
Not advocating to bring him in. I’ve said hes a lazy target. Would like feedback from all of yous.
Henrique has been playing a mix of wing and center. And will cost more.Henrique is playing center.
Eller would be cheaper possibly.
We need goal scorers. That’s not Wennberg
Re Vatrano -
He’s got 16 even strength goals and 11 on the PP, couple shorties. He’s shooting a hot 15.2%. He shoots a ton as we know.
We all know he’s on every teams list, the history here and that he’s got another year of term which is attractive.
Were the metrics dog shit with Kreider and Mika when he was here?
Besides the fact of cost being too high, what’s the reasoning so many here are turned off by acquiring the player?
Not advocating to bring him in. I’ve said hes a lazy target. Would like feedback from all of yous.
I think a 3rd plus a lower level prospect or pick, depending on that third team retention would be fair.So, it seems like Wennberg is a done deal. I’m ok with it in a vacuum.
We should poll everyone here on what we think an acceptable cost would be so that we can revisit it and twist ourselves into pretzels justifying the overpay once it actually goes down.
Re Vatrano -
He’s got 16 even strength goals and 11 on the PP, couple shorties. He’s shooting a hot 15.2%. He shoots a ton as we know.
We all know he’s on every teams list, the history here and that he’s got another year of term which is attractive.
Were the metrics dog shit with Kreider and Mika when he was here?
Besides the fact of cost being too high, what’s the reasoning so many here are turned off by acquiring the player?
Not advocating to bring him in. I’ve said hes a lazy target. Would like feedback from all of yous.
Wennberg doesn't move the needle at all. Would just be pissing more assets away.Sam And Joe just plugged Wennberg so you know it’s close
alright I think im finally out on Kakko - I dont think he figures it out here. He’s a headcase. Send him to a small market.
A headcase?? What lol. Smh. Misplaced take.alright I think im finally out on Kakko - I dont think he figures it out here. He’s a headcase. Send him to a small market.
Wennberg doesn't move the needle at all. Would just be pissing more assets away.
I understand your frustration but didn't he just put up 7 points in 9 games or something like that?alright I think im finally out on Kakko - I dont think he figures it out here. He’s a headcase. Send him to a small market.
I mean that is a super low price for Tony D lol.