Roster Building thread - Part X - (TDL edition)

[Kords]

 

[kovazub94]

I don't disagree with this, but are we then okay pushing Edstrom back to the AHL? Same with Rempe?

Edstrom is 13 to challenge Goodrow for the last spot and I think Rempe would be going back regardless (to comeback with the black aces eventually)

 

[UnSandvich]

please god no.

 

[KOVALEV022473]

Got to give credit to Brooks on this one if it happens. He had Wennberg as a target two weeks ago.

Do you think there is anything to the Tuch rumors?

 

[IDvsEGO]

please god no.

It’s brooks, he says something I automatically assume the opposite.

Do you think there is anything to the Tuch rumors?

I hope not. I like Tuch, but he’s a Buffalo native and he’d require a big overpay.

 

[Go Rangers]

I'll be glad when all this bs is over.

If we're going to expend serious assets (Othmann, Berard, Sykora etc.) or picks (1st, 2nd rounders) what will make me happy is if we spend them on players with term remaining (not rentals) who will actually plug meaningful holes and in meaningful ways. Maybe it's just me but I look at the moves we made last year and one round and out and a 1st and 2nd gone. Tarasenko was okay and Kane was about as good as a 1 legged player could be but 1 legged players have a serious handicap. We ended with nothing to show for all that.

Wennberg doesn't do that for me. If we're going to throw a 4th or and/or a so so prospect fine. Go ahead. But personally he might have a nice 200' game but he doesn't give me the feeling that if he's on our 3rd line we're going to get any or much more offense than we're getting out of it now and the upgrade there over Brodzinski might be minimal if at all.

Factor in dolan and mistakes will be made.

 

[huerter]

Never trade for a guy who’s wife is 8 months pregnant.

 

[RangerBoy]

Probably a 4th

 

[RGY]

Please no to Vatrano. There are so many other options for a similar output given the minutes that will be provided here for a lesser price on the trade market

 

[Boris Zubov]

Probably a 4th

Staple is calling for a 2nd for Wennberg? Is Drury bidding against himself again?

 

[Alluckks]

Probably a 4th

Why would they need his cap hit reduced so much

 

[AirGut]

Probably a 4th

that prospect better be a C or D level guy

 

[Chalfdiggity3]

Probably a 4th

lol this is disgusting. You all hate Kakko and yet, here’s kakko without any skill.

 

[NYR Viper]

They don’t need double retention. Why?

 

[GoAwayPanarin]

Staple is speculating btw.

 

[DanielBrassard]

Figured it would be a 2nd+. Vatrano would be terribly underwhelming, I want nothing to do with him.

 

[Alluckks]

Staple is speculating btw.

I'd bet good money Staple doesn't know how the cap works mid-season.

 

[Chalfdiggity3]

They don’t need double retention. Why?

Because to unlock trading Goodrow we need another blah player to over pay for to take his spot lol

 

[NYR Viper]

Robertson + for Wennbeeg

 

[DanielBrassard]

They don’t need double retention. Why?

They do if they want to add a bigger contract at RW.

 

[Vitto79]

Staple is calling for a 2nd for Wennberg? Is Drury bidding against himself again?

I will be surprised if this isn’t the cost
A 3rd is ok but a 2nd seals it for Seattle
Seperated a team from another plus whatever prospect

 

[GoAwayPanarin]

Also Vatrano would be such a vomit inducing add.

He's barely scored more goals than Kakko 5v5 and Kakko missed a shit load of time.

 

[NYR Viper]

Robertson was a 2nd, perfectly fine with him being involved

They do if they want to add a bigger contract at RW.

They really don’t.

 

[Savant]

He’s not sight unseen though? I mean you could say the same thing about any UFA who’s not already on the team

He is completely site unseen. Why are you giving him an extension if you don’t know if he has any chemistry here?

 

[GoAwayPanarin]

Robertson was a 2nd, perfectly fine with him being involved



They really don’t.

Depends on the contract.