Roster Building thread - Part X - (TDL edition)

Status
Not open for further replies.

bernmeister

Registered User
Jun 11, 2010
28,593
4,179
Da Big Apple
I deleted it because it was spam.
I'm not surprised it was you.

Even if it was actually spam, was it so egregious that it would have killed you to revise the content and delete the extra ' no's, instead of going to the nuclear option of deleting, which arguably could be viewed as censorship, since that choice also eliminated the opinion on keeping Rempe?

I don't have this prob with ANY other mods.
btw

I would say something but anything further would cross the line.
 

Gardner McKay

RIP, Jimmy.
Jun 27, 2007
26,032
15,483
SoutheastOfDisorder
I'm not surprised it was you.

Even if it was actually spam, was it so egregious that it would have killed you to revise the content and delete the extra ' no's, instead of going to the nuclear option of deleting, which arguably could be viewed as censorship, since that choice also eliminated the opinion on keeping Rempe?

I don't have this prob with ANY other mods.
btw

I would say something but anything further would cross the line.
I have no problem with you.

And no, I am not revising two posts that contains 50 straight no's.

Spare me the censorship BS, bern. You've lost that battle enough. Anything else take it to PM.
 

bernmeister

Registered User
Jun 11, 2010
28,593
4,179
Da Big Apple
I know you have your sources, but I would have to agree that the Rangers won't want to part with Laf now that he is really getting better every game, and with better luck would have even more points. At the same time, Ottawa likely wants nothing less. So chances are we will miss out on another Tkachuk and it will be unfortunate.

Rangers would probably offer Kakko, Chytil(cap and potential for his return), 1st and maybe Lindgren? Fun to think about. Would likely add a prospect too.

Also, I feel like he is a pretty strict LW. Last thing we need. Haha
LaF + Perrault + 2025 1st + Lindgren + Vesey
for
Sanderson + Thachuk + two 2nds


Kakko for Zegras tho? That intrigues me more in the summer but it does intrigue me
no keep kk
I am aware of the dissent but I maintain a core of Othmann + Berard + is fair and the correct basis of a deal.

Can Cam Fowler still play? He’s always been a top 4 guy and can play both sides. Not much size but I’ll take a good defenseman. Just thinking outside the box while we’re on the Ducks
NO to CF
no more adding vets
esp when currency going back is likely youth we need to keep

Straight up?

Other pieces would have to be involved. Tkachuk would bring something the Rangers top 6 don't have, but Lafreniere is finally becoming a useful top 6 player. I would prefer to leave Lafreniere out of it, but OTT would want him included. Other pieces OTT would want, I'd be reluctant to make that trade either. Price would be too much for me. Others on here would likely disagree LOL :laugh:
see above package
8 yrs Sanderson and your search for 1LD to partner w/Fox is over
plus, Tka.

that would be youth for youth
 

Vitto79

Registered User
May 24, 2008
27,544
3,778
Sarnia
Tanev went basically for 2 -2nds so that’s good for buyers I’d think . Probably the top D rental
 

RGY

Kreid or Die
Jul 18, 2005
24,768
14,042
Long Island, NY
We gotta get forward help to slide Brodzinski and Vesey down. Have to do it. I prefer Kakko on the 3rd line with Cuylle — well truth be told I prefer Kreider on the 3rd line but that aint happening.

Kreider-Zib-Eberle
Panarin-Troch-Laf
Cuylle-Gourde-Kakko
Edstrom-Goodrow-Vesey
Brodzinski/Rempe
 

McRanger92

Registered User
Jun 7, 2017
11,339
20,964
We gotta get forward help to slide Brodzinski and Vesey down. Have to do it. I prefer Kakko on the 3rd line with Cuylle — well truth be told I prefer Kreider on the 3rd line but that aint happening.

Kreider-Zib-Eberle
Panarin-Troch-Laf
Cuylle-Gourde-Kakko
Edstrom-Goodrow-Vesey
Brodzinski/Rempe

This is the way. The way Rempe and Ed look should give Drury some bargaining power in a buyers market. Getting a Jenner or Gourde type would be costly but it’s what this team needs so bad.
 

RangersFan1994

Registered User
Aug 20, 2019
17,878
14,578
This is the way. The way Rempe and Ed look should give Drury some bargaining power in a buyers market. Getting a Jenner or Gourde type would be costly but it’s what this team needs so bad.


Maybe the Rangers top 6 should play with some passion and emotion. Trocheck does.

A random thought.
Verbeek at the game tonight; I will guess he’s going to want Gabriel Perrault included in any trade(s) with Drury.


He is not available for a rental or someone not named Zegras or McTavish
 

IDvsEGO

Registered User
Oct 11, 2016
5,137
5,056
A random thought.
Verbeek at the game tonight; I will guess he’s going to want Gabriel Perrault included in any trade(s) with Drury.
Perrault wouldn’t be available for anything verbeek would likely want to move.
Perrault wouldn’t have fallen to us in a redraft.
He also wouldn’t attend our game if he wanted to watch Perrault. Rempe tho
 

McRanger92

Registered User
Jun 7, 2017
11,339
20,964
He’s here to talk, not taking anyone home with him

I’d be underwhelmed with a Vatrano/Henrique package unless it was a fleecing by us. I’m much more interested in Vatrano on his own because of the locker room chemistry and shot.
 

huerter

Registered User
Aug 16, 2020
4,488
2,301
We gotta get forward help to slide Brodzinski and Vesey down. Have to do it. I prefer Kakko on the 3rd line with Cuylle — well truth be told I prefer Kreider on the 3rd line but that aint happening.

Kreider-Zib-Eberle
Panarin-Troch-Laf
Cuylle-Gourde-Kakko
Edstrom-Goodrow-Vesey
Brodzinski/Rempe
stop line numbering
 
  • Like
Reactions: NYROrtsFan

PuckLuck3043

Stairway To Heaven
Nov 15, 2017
10,739
16,536
Hudson Valley
You can't get them for a 4th rounder because it's an insane sellers market right now (as it usually is).

This is also why selling is the way more beneficial thing to do. This hockey culture of "you have to buy or the locker room revolts," is a pure myth and it's a foolish way to manage your assets.

Expensive renting almost never is worth it, almost never pans out in winning a Cup. You will increase your odds of winning a Cup by selling from a non-elite playoff team rather than buying.




We have seen the story with Vatrano. He's not moving the needle. His production is PP production which he wouldn't get here.

Henrique is an upgrade (maybe, depends on if he fits in, we've seen plenty of rentals NOT fit in) on Brodzinski but that's not saying much.

Again, there is very little history of expensive rentals boosting a team with major holes over the top. Yet we always fall for this trap.

I'm sure this team will stupidly overpay like they always do and then yet again not win a Cup and yet again next year we will have the same cast of characters telling us how we have to overpay again because we have holes. Holes that we could fill long term if we just stop renting and then we'd have a surplus.

I don't know how many times we need to see this story play out. The "we have to rent now," narrative is just pushing false hope. Let's increase our odds from 5% to 7%! And we will sacrifice a chance at another Perrault for that miniscule chance.
Non elite playoff position? 3/4 of the way in the season they are first in the metro and first overall in points. All teams in this position will be looking to buy. How aggressively they buy and what they give up remains to be seen.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Ad

Ad