Speculation: Roster Building Thread Part VIII: Dilly Dilly - Lets Tank!

  • Xenforo Cloud has upgraded us to version 2.3.6. Please report any issues you experience.
Status
Not open for further replies.
It depends which Blackhawks team you’re talking about.

It’s moot anyway, the CBA is different now. You can’t sign players until the sun burns out to save on the cap hit.

Not to mention “elite” is a totally subjective term and at the end of the day pretty useless. Cup formulas, fitting players into nice, little compartments...it all kind of rubs me the wrong way. People will use the 2014 Rangers as an example, but if you’re in the Stanley Cup Final, you are capable of winning a championship; it’s baloney to say otherwise.

The Rangers were 3 timely goals from winning that series so “people” can kindly shut tfu.
 
We were so good, and Hank, man...

All I remember thinking was “Puhlease let us draw the Blackhawks.”

As I was 100% certain that had we drawn the dynasty we all drool over, we would have smashed them. We used to spank that team in the regular season and we just (at our best) had them.

Ugh.
 
  • Like
Reactions: lucky13 and nyr2k2
We were so good, and Hank, man...

All I remember thinking was “Puhlease let us draw the Blackhawks.”

As I was 100% certain that had we drawn the dynasty we all drool over, we would have smashed them. We used to spank that team in the regular season and we just (at our best) had them.

Ugh.
Yep I also wanted the Hawks. It's like in 2015 for the Mets I really wanted the Jays. Just better match ups.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rongomania
Would anyone be opposed to a Zucc for Panarin type swap?

Columbus, I would imagine, but I see no reason to make that deal for the Rangers. IF we want him, sign him as a UFA. If he doesn't make it to UFA, oh well.
 
Columbus, I would imagine, but I see no reason to make that deal for the Rangers. IF we want him, sign him as a UFA. If he doesn't make it to UFA, oh well.

The other potential issue with Zuccarello to Columbus is Tortorella. I don't think Zucc was a favorite of his.
 
New York Rangers: 4 teams that may want to add center by trade deadline

If Gorton shopped Spooner and Namestnikov before and after the draft and failed then why didn't he attempt to sign them for less so that we could get a higher trade return due to lower cap hit?
That's not entirely how cap hits work.

Cap hits are pro-rated.

Trade Deadline Q & A

How is a player's salary charged against a team's salary cap when a trade is made at the
deadline?


The salary that is charged against a team's cap is the pro rated amount remaining of the
player's average yearly salary. For example, if a player has an average yearly salary of $2 million, the amount charged against the acquiring team's cap is the pro-rated amount remaining of $2 million.

This is calculated by dividing $2 million by the number of days in the season (186). The
amount ($10,753) is then multiplied by the number of days remaining in the season from the day the trade is made (42 days if trade is on Feb. 28) to ascertain the amount charged against the team's cap ($451,613).

So, Spooner and Namestnikov will be worth a whole heck of a lot less than $4M at the deadline. Both seasons.
 
Last edited:
yes, but if some team has bunch of injuries in the beginning of the year, the 4 mil cap hit might be too much.
If the injuries are serious enough that you're trading for $4M players at the beginning of the year, it's likely that you're using LTIR anyway, which will cover most bases for the season and the GM will figure out the rest as they go along.
 
The whole point is that at no point during the season will their contracts be untradeable due to their cap hit. $4M is not that much.
 
  • Like
Reactions: egelband
The whole point is that at no point during the season will their contracts be untradeable due to their cap hit. $4M is not that much.

I never said untradeable, but the lower the cap the higher the return and the more teams are interested. And if they are traded this season, the other team has their full cap hit next season.
 
What is the obsession with trading Namestnikov? People have been beating this drum for 6 months now, it makes me curious what kind of return is being expected.
 
What is the obsession with trading Namestnikov? People have been beating this drum for 6 months now, it makes me curious what kind of return is being expected.

I love how he somehow managed to twist it in a way that he can blame Gorton again.
 
What is the obsession with trading Namestnikov? People have been beating this drum for 6 months now, it makes me curious what kind of return is being expected.

The Ranger don't have any intention of trading Namestnikov without seeing him play for an extended period first. For whatever reason, they were eyeing him for a long time and have said so.

Honestly, the season can't start fast enough - some of these summer-I'm-bored-posts are excruciating lol.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad