Oscar Lindberg
Registered User
Say it louder for the people in the backThe problem with the Lindbom pick isn't Lindbom, it's that he's a goalie. You don't draft a goalie that high. That's drafting 101.
Say it louder for the people in the backThe problem with the Lindbom pick isn't Lindbom, it's that he's a goalie. You don't draft a goalie that high. That's drafting 101.
What are we doing with Spooner and Namesnikov?
Thank the dear lord. I am tired of him. Matt Hunwick was the last good "spare" defenseman that we hadIn The Hockey News Yearbook, they rank the Rangers depth chart of defenseman as follows:
Well.... that's interesting. Pionk ahead of Staal. ADA ahead of both Claesson & Smith. Kampfer nowhere to be found.
- Kevin Shattenkirk
- Brady Skjei
- Neal Pionk
- Marc Staal
- Tony DeAngelo
- Freddy Claesson
- Brendan Smith
- John Gilmour
- Ryan Lindgren
- Libor Hajek
One would think that between Montoya, Lafleur and Halverson, we might have learned to not pick goaltenders so high...Say it louder for the people in the back
One would think that between Montoya, Lafleur and Halverson, we might have learned to not pick goaltenders so high...
It is what it is though. If you're going to make the "I know something everyone else doesn't know" type of pick, it better work out. Far too early to judge that.
I don't mind if they draft a goaltender every year, just do it in the 4th or later.
Just draft a goalie in the 6th or 7th every year and call it a day.
TBH, I'd never draft a goalie but that's just meJust draft a goalie in the 6th or 7th every year and call it a day.
TBH, I'd never draft a goalie but that's just me
Goalies have no trade value, you can get capable starters relatively cheap if you ever need to. Further, anyone who says they can accurately predict what goalie will be good when they're 18 is full of shit. I'd wait longer, find some guys who have more data, have seen more games, and target undrafted FAs.I really don't get this. Raanta, Talbot, Bobrovsky, and Jones is enough evidence for you to say drafting goalies is worthless?
I think I looked at this a while back, but don't most of these guys fall into either first or third round picks? I don't remember seeing many starting goalies being selected in the second round. The only three I can think of off the top of my head are Gibson, Lehner, and Markstrom. Then from more recent drafts, I remembered there being some promising prospects like Carter Hart and Alex Nadeljkovic, but I don't remember more than that.We always look at how many goaltending prospects fail, but this is an important thing to remember: 55% of starting goalies last season, including the ones that were starters because the real starter was injured (like Forsberg) were drafted in rounds 1-3. That number gets higher if you only include the ones that would be the top of the team's healthy depth chart.
In the Rangers specific situation, it didn't make a whole lot of sense... but overall, this shouldn't be a hard and fast rule.
Goalies have no trade value, you can get capable starters relatively cheap if you ever need to. Further, anyone who says they can accurately predict what goalie will be good when they're 18 is full of ****. I'd wait longer, find some guys who have more data, have seen more games, and target undrafted FAs.
I think I looked at this a while back, but don't most of these guys fall into either first or third round picks? I don't remember seeing many starting goalies being selected in the second round. The only three I can think of off the top of my head are Gibson, Lehner, and Markstrom. Then from more recent drafts, I remembered there being some promising prospects like Carter Hart and Alex Nadeljkovic, but I don't remember more than that.
Two notes:
1). Shumakov is Russian, therefore, he couldn't punch his way out of a wet paper bag.
What are we doing with Spooner and Namesnikov?
Who said Russians are soft?
Maybe retaining Mikhail Pashnin's rights was a smart long-term move by Slats and Gorton?![]()
TBH, I'd never draft a goalie but that's just me
pretty sure andersson's can't slide again because of his age
If a player who is signed to an entry-level contract and is 18 or 19 years of age (as of September 15 of the signing year), does not play in a minimum of 10 NHL games (including both regular season and playoffs; AHL games do not count), their contract is considered to ‘slide’, or extend, by one year. For example, if a player signed an ELC for three seasons from 2015-16 to 2017-2018, and their contract slides, their contract is now effective from 2016-17 to 2018-19. An exception to this rule is that if the player is 19 on September 15 of the first year of their contract, and turns 20 between September 16 and December 31, their contract does not slide.
Players who sign at 18 years old are eligible to have their contracted extended for 2 seasons. This extension does not apply if the player turns 20 between September 16 and December 31 in his signing year. Signing bonuses do not slide, and are paid to the player regardless of a slide, this causes the annual average of the players contract to change, and therefore the cap hit decreases for this player.
Andersson's contract can slide because he signed when he was 18:
NHL CBA FAQ - CapFriendly - NHL Salary Caps
Slides but is an accrued pro season. Yay confusingness.
Yeah. But it doesn't really matter in Andersson's case because if 2019-20 is his 1st accrued season, he will hit his UFA years at age 27, which would happen either way at that age.