Were you factually correct with Nieves as 1C here? Your obsession with Broberg? WFAN is taking calls all day today.
Yes, I was factually correct about Nieves!
Once and for all, bend buckle and break to the point of desisting in your false narrative.
I never said, and actually took pains to clarify to the contrary, that Boo was not on his own superior/elite/1C material, but WAS good at 'carrying the mail' and was on paper a good fit w/Kreider + Zib as Ws which, given they were the only and clear cut first liners at that time would make Nieves our de facto 1C.
I was correct that there is and was ZERO basis for Rs not to at least try this experiment, it cost them nothing beyond a fair trial, which they did not do.
As for Broberg, no obsession, he looked/still looks good on paper, seems Oil screwed him up as much as we effed up Kravtsov.
THAT is NOT on me.
I may have gotten a few wrong over the years, but not those 2.
////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
While you are at it, why don't you acknowledge the many dozens of calls I got right? Stuff I had the balls to unambiguously call out ahead of the curve.
Move Buch not at last minute minimizing return
Don't deal Kreider
be smart on Talbot return
be smarter about Stall and esp Girardi deal before they are pilons
draft Dobson over Kravtsov
just to name a few.