Once again, a whole lot of words and not a whole lot of substance.
Sez you, once again,, erroneously.
You've got Garand as your starter? A 21 year old goalie that needs more time in the oven and that couldn't beat out a washed up 38 year old as your backup? I mean, that alone sinks your ship.
Whether or not Garand could benefit from more time is secondary; primary here is can he step in, and answer suggests yes.
As to Quick, that was obv beyond stupid and Drury may be forced to reverse this like yesterday. There are limits to what even Alaire can do.
Obv Quick beat out NOBODY
Shesterkin in his prime is your best bet to win a Stanley Cup. You've got two years left on a very fair contract.
That is why you deal him NOW to get max return.
Learn from stupidity of holding on to Buch too long.
Sanderson, a whole season under his belt, locked up for 8 years @ 8+M is your primary target? Sophomore slump? What kind of message does this send to Miller?
You grossly and criminaly underrate Sandy.
Message to KAM is play high end, you get paid high end.
You're trading away the two best forward prospects, BY A MILE, in the organization (Cuylle is on the roster so I'll lose the word prospect for him) in an organization that typically has trouble drafting the right people at forward - and these are two the Rangers likely got right for once.
Maybe up there, but necessary b'c Sens don't give up stud youth w'o youth going back.
Also, while Oth, unlike LaF shows a motor, both he and Per have an Achilles heel -skating/speed.
Have you learned nothing?
Pinto has all of 43 points in 99 games in 3 years in the NHL. Clearly a must have.
Sufficiently high enuf upside, def worth the risk, has more physical ability than either.
Grieg another must have with 20 games under his NHL belt.
Nice throw in, cheap fit, upgrades Vesey, etc
Whose spots are these two Centers taking? Trocheck? Zibanejad? Chtyil? Bonino on the 4th line? For once the Rangers are pretty deep at center and these are the guys you're targeting?
At this point, Chytil + Zib + Tro are your pivots, but there is room for competition as to who is C based on things like FO strength, etc., w/room for somebody to slide to W.
What's Ottawa doing here? Taking a step back when they clearly want to take a step forward by trading four starters for a goalie, Goodrow, and two prospects? NO.
Goodrow is out in the oorrected version due to Sanderson stll at elc $$ this yr.
Sens are saying Shesty is Vez good, we add 2 young elc Fs to replace young rfa Fs we gave up.
Tarasenko? Let's sign Kane for peanuts instead.
He is a stop gap throw in on this for cap balance.
It's asinine. It's ludicrous. It'll never happen. It's an awful proposal for both clubs with 8 moving parts that make little to no sense for either team.
Your erroneous opinion x 4.
I'm done here. I've taken the time, there are my points, and this is finished
fine by me
peace out