Toggle sidebar

Speculation: Roster Building Thread: Part LVI

  • Xenforo Cloud will be upgrading us to version 2.3.5 on March 3rd at 12 AM GMT. This version has increased stability and fixes several bugs. We expect downtime for the duration of the update. The admin team will continue to work on existing issues, templates and upgrade all necessary available addons to minimize impact of this new version. Click Here for Updates
Status
Not open for further replies.
RGY said:
As @Edge has pointed out, Strome is the most likely to be moved over DeAngelo and Buchnevich in that order. And it sounded like they’ve been actively discussing how to move Strome based on what Edge said.
Click to expand...
Which is interesting when you consider that would require them to have a plan to backfill the 2/3C spot
 
  • Like
Reactions: RGY
Chytilmania said:
If Lindholm is that good (not saying he isn't) and a great contract for 2C then why would Calgary be looking to deal him?
I'm with @Avery16 I'd rather add Strome and/or 22 to get 19+ in return instead of straight up.
Click to expand...
The premise is Calgary is looking for a shake up after another disappointing post season. Their media speculation, not this board. They feel like Monahan, Gaudreau and Lindholm are very good in season players. Calgary is looking for post season performers, however.
 
Oscar Lindberg said:
Which is interesting when you consider that would require them to have a plan to backfill the 2/3C spot
Click to expand...

i think we know what that plan would be if we don’t get a 2C. Not sure fans will be happy but it would mean Howden as 3C and probably a cheaper veteran 4C signed. Chytil would be the 2C. Bringing Boyle back for instance could be an option.
 
strome ada 22 for lindholm bennett 19

step back in raw production numbers but gets the change and variety to the roster that we need and edge had alluded that management wants. even without the pick swap could see this being the basis for a deal.

Even if this were to happen I would still have a lot of interest in Bozak if the numbers could work to have him come in for one year and anchor a 4th line while adding pk and then being insulation for the top 9 centers in case of injury in what is going to be a condensed season.
 
Last edited:
Oscar Lindberg said:
Which is interesting when you consider that would require them to have a plan to backfill the 2/3C spot
Click to expand...
I agree. And I have faith in Gorton and JD to address that. They are not going to roll out the kids in the 2C and/or the full compliment of the bottom 6. They just wont. They wont do it when they are entering the 2nd year of Panarin’s deal, Zib being 2 years away from FA, extending Kreider, and just now landing Lafreniere after having already landed Kakko. They are going to start the transition to contention. Even if it is 1-2 year deals for stopgap vets to provide quality depth, experience, and leadership. Even if its just leadership in a mentor role for the guys on their respective line, and not so much the vocal one in the lockerroom. You need that handoff, that insulation.
 
  • Like
Reactions: charliemurphy
GoAwayStaal said:
1 for 1 in this case is probably fair (I may be higher on Lindholm than others) or maybe with a slight add coming from Calgary. Lindholm is strong in the areas where Strome absolutely sucks, so hes a substantial enough upgrade from that aspect to justify making the move but I guess it comes down to if you'd rather have DeAngelo+Strome for now vs Lindholm for 4 seasons and what ever you get for Strome?
Click to expand...
There's also the consideration of his contract, which is fantastic.
 
  • Like
Reactions: McSauer and charliemurphy
This isn't a criticism of anyone in particular, but IMO if Sam Bennett had been drafted in the 4th round no one would be talking about targeting him for 3/4C at this point. He's not that good even in a bottom 6 role.
 
Just spit-balling but say the Rangers can't find a 2C this season but have a deal on the table they like for Strome. Would anyone be interested in the following players on 1 year deals as stop-gaps and what would you offer:

Granlund
Soderberg
Turris (assuming he is bought out)


I'd probably go:

Granlund - 1 year @ $4m with $2m signing bonus
Soderberg - 1 year @ $5m with $2m signing bonus
Turris - 1 year @ $3m with $1.5m signing bonus

I'd be okay with any of these guys as stop-gap 2/3c's for a season and I'd assume they would prefer a 1 year deal so as to avoid being exposed to Seattle. They could then pick their spot next year
 
  • Like
Reactions: mas0764
NYR Viper said:
Just spit-balling but say the Rangers can't find a 2C this season but have a deal on the table they like for Strome. Would anyone be interested in the following players on 1 year deals as stop-gaps and what would you offer:

Granlund
Soderberg
Turris (assuming he is bought out)


I'd probably go:

Granlund - 1 year @ $4m with $2m signing bonus
Soderberg - 1 year @ $5m with $2m signing bonus
Turris - 1 year @ $3m with $1.5m signing bonus

I'd be okay with any of these guys as stop-gap 2/3c's for a season and I'd assume they would prefer a 1 year deal so as to avoid being exposed to Seattle. They could then pick their spot next year
Click to expand...

3 mil is the max I would go on any of them. No need to waste cap space.
 
NYR Viper said:
Just spit-balling but say the Rangers can't find a 2C this season but have a deal on the table they like for Strome. Would anyone be interested in the following players on 1 year deals as stop-gaps and what would you offer:

Granlund
Soderberg
Turris (assuming he is bought out)


I'd probably go:

Granlund - 1 year @ $4m with $2m signing bonus
Soderberg - 1 year @ $5m with $2m signing bonus
Turris - 1 year @ $3m with $1.5m signing bonus

I'd be okay with any of these guys as stop-gap 2/3c's for a season and I'd assume they would prefer a 1 year deal so as to avoid being exposed to Seattle. They could then pick their spot next year
Click to expand...

I see Granlund as a FA option to replace Buchnevich if he's moved, not Strome. Granlund really isn't a center.
 
I know it’s not the sexy thing to do but I think the best course of action might be just keep Strome who played well w Panarin on a 1-2 year deal and see if anything else shakes out from teams w financial difficulties over the next year or so.

Sure if you get an amazing offer for Strome or can close on a better long term target, go for it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Barnaby, Chytilmania, DutchShamrock and 4 others
HatTrick Swayze said:
I know it’s not the sexy thing to do but I think the best course of action might be just keep Strome who played well w Panarin on a 1-2 year deal and see if anything else shakes out from teams w financial difficulties over the next year or so.

Sure if you get an amazing offer for Strome or can close on a better long term target, go for it.
Click to expand...
To me it just depends what else is out there in a trade, and if that isnt feasible, if Strome isnt crazy about his ask on a 1 or 2 year extension. Otherwise, get a UFA plug for cheaper.
 
Last edited:
HatTrick Swayze said:
I know it’s not the sexy thing to do but I think the best course of action might be just keep Strome who played well w Panarin on a 1-2 year deal and see if anything else shakes out from teams w financial difficulties over the next year or so.

Sure if you get an amazing offer for Strome or can close on a better long term target, go for it.
Click to expand...
Agreed.

It seems like everyone is hellbent on filling that 2C slot with a longterm option this summer, and that might not be the best approach if it means we’re parting with someone JG sees as a core piece for us.

I believe Gorton is more than willing to make a move if the opportunity makes sense, but he won’t be making any hasty decisions seeing that we’re still in the building process.

This also might mean another year of Smith + Staal at LD.
 
NYRFANMANI said:
It's for one year, who cares if it is a bit more.
Click to expand...
I'd take Strome over those 3, and I just don't believe he's the likeliest move. GM's put a lot of faith in "proven" players, whether short or long-term. "Ain't broke, don't fix it." That's how businessmen think.

Additionally, consider that he was like .5PPG+ IN 2019. They'll re-sign unless A. a better, more concrete option appears or B. he asks for too much... really, all RFAs have a higher chance of being traded but the won't dig a hole to fill another. Not JG, he's more a drafting/stockpiling GM.
 
  • Like
Reactions: NYRFANMANI
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest posts

Ad

Ad

Top Bottom