Speculation: Roster Building Thread: Part LIV

  • Xenforo Cloud will be upgrading us to version 2.3.5 on March 3rd at 12 AM GMT. This version has increased stability and fixes several bugs. We expect downtime for the duration of the update. The admin team will continue to work on existing issues, templates and upgrade all necessary available addons to minimize impact of this new version. Click Here for Updates
Status
Not open for further replies.
Elias Lindholm so what would be a fair trade ? Supposedly we have a on going conversation with the Flames so maybe we can put together a package that helps both teams?
 
This will be my last reply for a while as well. We're done with lunch, but doing other activities.

Georgiev will be a guy who the team considers moving. They view his value as being worth a bottom six player, or a higher second round pick. There are teams expected to have interest in him and those conversations will likely continue to take place.

His fate exists seperately from Lundqvist. I would say the odds of Lundqvist staying are not favorable at this point. Lundqvist is a potential buy-out candidate (obviously they would love he retired and they could celebrate his career in a number of interesting ways).

Staal I think is here for next year. I think they ride out that storm.
HF posters remain gathered around @Edge home for additional breaking news

upload_2020-9-12_13-10-15.png
 
Imagine being told in the summer of 2017 that of Shattenkirk, Lundqvist and Staal, Staal is the last man standing from buyouts

God
 
I've been a huge Buch fan from the moment we drafted him, and I would do a deal centered on Buch+ for Lindholm in a hot second.
Agreed. I love Buchnevich and have no interest in moving him for futures. I've seen some here talking about Buchnevich for Edmonton's 1st and I don't find that enticing at all. With Lafreniere this year and Kakko last, the window has been moved up. You trade Buchnevich, or DeAngelo, only in a hockey trade for a young established player to shore up areas of weakness to complement our strengths (wing, RD). Can't continue to obsess over acquiring draft picks when the pipeline is already oozing with talent that will either be on the team next year, or are already 1yr+ into their development and arrival is on the horizon.
 
Brodin is an interesting name. The fact that he's a UFA at the end of the year is a double-edged sword. He'll need a bigger deal but the team could do a wink-and-handshake deal and not have to expose him to Seattle, thus keeping most of their D in tact. Though that's only really an issue if the team still has DeAngelo on the roster at that point, which I think is a stretch. Minny supposedly wants a scoring center. Would they be interested in Strome? Rangers want some more north-south guys and were rumored to like Greenway previously. Maybe Brodin and Greenway for Strome and 22?

Though if the Wild move Dumba, maybe DeAngelo is a surprise target for them to replace that offense from the blue line.
 
Agreed. I love Buchnevich and have no interest in moving him for futures. I've seen some here talking about Buchnevich for Edmonton's 1st and I don't find that enticing at all. With Lafreniere this year and Kakko last, the window has been moved up. You trade Buchnevich, or DeAngelo, only in a hockey trade for a young established player to shore up areas of weakness to complement our strengths (wing, RD). Can't continue to obsess over acquiring draft picks when the pipeline is already oozing with talent that will either be on the team next year, or are already 1yr+ into their development and arrival is on the horizon.
Yeah, as @Edge has mentioned repeatedly, the situation was quite different last year when EDM's pick was the potential return, because a) we hadn't yet won the Lafreniere lottery and b) Zegras was the very specific target.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Krams
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Ad