Speculation: Roster Building Thread: Part LII

  • Xenforo Cloud will be upgrading us to version 2.3.5 on March 3rd at 12 AM GMT. This version has increased stability and fixes several bugs. We expect downtime for the duration of the update. The admin team will continue to work on existing issues, templates and upgrade all necessary available addons to minimize impact of this new version. Click Here for Updates
Status
Not open for further replies.
I think when it happens and it will soon enough mike Sullivan will be our next coach and reunite with Martin.
 
the conversation is about what Ottawa would give up, not Gordon.

Gorton.

Well, this is the Rangers forum, not the Ottawa forum, so speculating about Ottawa trade bait that doesn't involve a Rangers perspective seems kind of pointless. It takes two to trade.

Ottawa can dangle whatever draft picks they want, I don't think Gorton is looking for more picks for a player like ADA.
 
Gorton.

Well, this is the Rangers forum, not the Ottawa forum, so speculating about Ottawa trade bait that doesn't involve a Rangers perspective seems kind of pointless. It takes two to trade.

Ottawa can dangle whatever draft picks they want, I don't think Gorton is looking for more picks for a player like ADA.

Im relatively certain that if Ottawa dangled the 3 or the 5, DeAngelo would be a Senator next year.

Ottawa won't, so this is really a non discussion.
 
Well, this is the Rangers forum, not the Ottawa forum, so speculating about Ottawa trade bait that doesn't involve a Rangers perspective seems kind of pointless. It takes two to trade.
.

nice to see you calling out the posters participating in this conversation and what to post. I’ll bite my lip as where you can stick it.
 
Gorton is not moving ADA for draft picks. He'll want a top 6 forward in return if he's shopping him at all.

I know 3-way deals rarely happen, but it may be possible that Gorton may prefer a boat-load of futures to move them elsewhere to a team in need of cap space. Maybe a team like Toronto or Arizona would prefer the picks/prospects while a team like Ottawa may prefer the proven young player to help propel their team forward sooner rather than later.
 
nice to see you calling out the posters participating in this conversation and what to post. I’ll bite my lip as where you can stick it.

I'm not "calling out" anyone. All I'm saying is that it takes two to make a trade that makes sense for both organizations. Hypothetically putting out all kinds of stuff that one organization probably isn't looking for doesn't make a whole lot of sense. You have a real problem with people expressing their opinion(s) when they don't line up with yours and then create false narratives about the intent of the person posting.

I'm certainly entitled to post that I don't think it makes a lot of sense for the Rangers in a New York Rangers forum. You can like that or not.
 
  • Like
Reactions: FIRE DRURY
I know 3-way deals rarely happen, but it may be possible that Gorton may prefer a boat-load of futures to move them elsewhere to a team in need of cap space. Maybe a team like Toronto or Arizona would prefer the picks/prospects while a team like Ottawa may prefer the proven young player to help propel their team forward sooner rather than later.

Gorton, with or without buying out Lundqvist/Staal, is going to be up against it cap-wise. He's going to need young(ish) and less expensive options instead of futures to fill an NHL roster. He, likely, won't be able to afford ADA & Strome & Fast & Georgiev, etc.... but he still needs to field 20-21 players on an NHL roster.

I'd hate to see picks + Staal (for example) go somewhere just for the sake of dumping cap, but if it does it had better be later picks than the 1st round.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mas0764
Im relatively certain that if Ottawa dangled the 3 or the 5, DeAngelo would be a Senator next year.

Ottawa won't, so this is really a non discussion.

I'm relatively certain of the exact opposite but, hey, that's what forums are for. Who's taking his spot should the impossible occur? Miller? Smith?
 
Despite the 3 games there, the team overachieved this season. Several young players have taken huge strides under his guidance. There’s not really a good reason for him to be on the hot seat.
1I wouldn’t say they overachieved. They rode a hot streak and were ahead of schedule because of it. Looked absolutely lost in the playoff series, which to me is more telling.

Davidson didn’t hire him. Gorton did obviously, but Davidson isn’t going to be attached to him if he struggled.

There are very good replacement options available right now. This isn’t a rebuild job anymore. Do they need a rebuilding coach if the rebuild is over? Winning two lotteries accelerated the team.

Finally I think to justify keeping that job the team needs to show some identity and some structure. Quinn has not shown he can develop that. So yeah, I think Quinn should be on the hot seat. It may not be entirely his fault but he needs to show a lot this season.
 
Gorton, with or without buying out Lundqvist/Staal, is going to be up against it cap-wise. He's going to need young(ish) and less expensive options instead of futures to fill an NHL roster. He, likely, won't be able to afford ADA & Strome & Fast & Georgiev, etc.... but he still needs to field 20-21 players on an NHL roster.

I'd hate to see picks + Staal (for example) go somewhere just for the sake of dumping cap, but if it does it had better be later picks than the 1st round.

I just need it to be better filler guys than PDG or McKegg.

Staal also has a full NMC, so it'll end up being a buyout or moving Smith or something along those lines.
 
To a large extent, I only really believe in this ‘getting a fellow countrymen’ if that countrymen is someone you would want the kid to be around all the time anyway. I rather have Buch hang around Kreider and Co than Namestnikov if you get what I mean.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Greg02
Gorton, this summer:

"I think it’s reasonable to assume that we’ll be out there looking to see how we can better our team," he said. "We have a number of picks, a couple first-rounders, obviously, and ways to better our team. Last year was very similar. We used some draft picks to acquire (defenseman Adam) Fox. We used another draft pick to acquire (defenseman Jacob) Trouba. Those are the kinds of things we'll look into and go through. It’s no different this year."

Which is why I don't think he's looking for picks for ADA - unless he's flipping them for a young top six forward.
 
1I wouldn’t say they overachieved. They rode a hot streak and were ahead of schedule because of it. Looked absolutely lost in the playoff series, which to me is more telling.

Davidson didn’t hire him. Gorton did obviously, but Davidson isn’t going to be attached to him if he struggled.

There are very good replacement options available right now. This isn’t a rebuild job anymore. Do they need a rebuilding coach if the rebuild is over? Winning two lotteries accelerated the team.

Finally I think to justify keeping that job the team needs to show some identity and some structure. Quinn has not shown he can develop that. So yeah, I think Quinn should be on the hot seat. It may not be entirely his fault but he needs to show a lot this season.

"They didn't overachieve" and "they're ahead of schedule" are two opposing statements. They were ahead of schedule because they overachieved. And it's far more common for young teams to look lost during their first playoff series than it is for them to look comfortable. I think you're drawing too strong of a conclusion from a 3-game set after 4 months off anyway.

The team HAS shown identity and structure, just not consistently. I'd go as far as to say that the personality they showed as things were coming together earlier this year was very much David Quinn's personality. Not being able to have it consistently is yet another thing that happens with young teams.

The build isn't over. It's nearing the end, but it's not over. I don't expect this team to be any more than a bubble team next year.

I don't disagree that the team needs to show improvements and that will reflect on Quinn. I just look at what's happened the last two years and, instead of thinking they won't happen, I think they will.
 
1I wouldn’t say they overachieved. They rode a hot streak and were ahead of schedule because of it. Looked absolutely lost in the playoff series, which to me is more telling.

Davidson didn’t hire him. Gorton did obviously, but Davidson isn’t going to be attached to him if he struggled.

There are very good replacement options available right now. This isn’t a rebuild job anymore. Do they need a rebuilding coach if the rebuild is over? Winning two lotteries accelerated the team.

Finally I think to justify keeping that job the team needs to show some identity and some structure. Quinn has not shown he can develop that. So yeah, I think Quinn should be on the hot seat. It may not be entirely his fault but he needs to show a lot this season.

To use an analogy: David Quinn is Phil Dunphy. Right now Jimmy McNulty is available, Toby Ziegler is available, Vic Mackey is available, Frank Underwood is available. Is Phil Dunphy the right guy to lead us into battle? Maybe. Maybe not. (And yes, Howden is Luke)
 
  • Like
Reactions: TheDirtyH
To use an analogy: David Quinn is Phil Dunphy. Right now Jimmy McNulty is available, Toby Ziegler is available, Vic Mackey is available, Frank Underwood is available. Is Phil Dunphy the right guy to lead us into battle? Maybe. Maybe not.
What is this analogy trying to communicate?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad