LORDE
I am Lorde, YA YA YA
As long as by "wacky" you don't mean Sather-esque... I'm probably OK w that.Drury is going to pull some wacky shit tomorrow.
As long as by "wacky" you don't mean Sather-esque... I'm probably OK w that.Drury is going to pull some wacky shit tomorrow.
Don’t be so sureClever? No team is taking 4+ years of a 3.5m hit. With Kadri it would be 6 or 7. Absolute impossible galaxy brain garbage.
And every season that passes with atrocious production obviously lowers his value. Right now teams may still view him as having potential. Another half season of this just moves Kakko closer being viewed as an outright bust.
In other words, if the Rangers don't trade him now, he may be worth less (or just worthless) when they try to later.
Something the asset management crowd leaves out here is the possibility that assets can depreciate...
Upgrade on Rooney, wouldn't hate it. Good in the dot and PK's.Ryan Carpenter
4-5m retention costs at least a mid round 1st per year. 4 or 5 years retention is too costly. With the Rangers expected to pick in the 25-32 range (almost 2nd round), the cost would get higher still than the Ranger's 1st/year. Fun exercise, too costly in the real world.I thought the Brooks scheme to sign Kadri or Malkin was pretty clever. The guy running Chicago seems to be in way over his head. Why not try something lIke this? There are 20 other teams who think the are Cup contenders in the same cap hell. Someone may try this.
Talk to NichkushkinKakko a bust at the age of 21. All you can do is laugh at this nonsense.
I thought the best thing about Braun was that he wasn't Nemeth...Staple seemed to suggest Braun wouldn’t be brought back which is a shame cause I thought he was solid. Maybe he wants to play on the right side
doesn't Chicago need to desperately reach the cap floor? I could see it being done especially if they get a free prospect like Lundkvist or Jones out of the dealClever? No team is taking 4+ years of a 3.5m hit. With Kadri it would be 6 or 7. Absolute impossible galaxy brain garbage.
doesn't Chicago need to desperately reach the cap floor? I could see it being done especially if they get a free prospect like Lundkvist or Jones out of the deal
Remind me of the Nedved situation, although we didn’t trade a haul to get him back.The Rangers trading JT for essentially nothing only to turn around and trade huge assets and hand him a bad deal would be peak Rongos
God I hope it isn’t JT
Panarin played like complete shit the entire playoffs. His point total is an anomaly. Panarin's playoffs can best be defined as sauntering into the offensive zone and backhanding a pass to the other team. He was complete and utter garbage at ES.CK and Panarin 16p, Fox 23p, Trouba takes out Crosby, Jarvis, Domi... Shesterkin one of the only reasons we were in some games...
exaggerate much? I get the hesitation with Chytil, but don't act like he wasn't given 4 SEASONS to finally emerge in the post season? KK played well? Really?
I don't wan't to see either moved for 1 yr deals. but if they are moved for more established players that can help us win a cup in the next 2-3 yrs, you have to do it.
doesn't Chicago need to desperately reach the cap floor? I could see it being done especially if they get a free prospect like Lundkvist or Jones out of the deal
Trading for DuboisAs long as by "wacky" you don't mean Sather-esque... I'm probably OK w that.
According to Arthur Staple the Rangers are not interested in him
According to Arthur Staple the Rangers are not interested in him
What does Valeri Nichushkin have anything whatsoever to do with Kakko? Are their careers interlinked in some multiverse?Talk to Nichkushkin
Besides being a douche, what does he do well?Max Domi, let the bloodlines continue here. I would not mind Max Domi on a 2 or 3 year deal
Brooksie is when Sather gives him some crumbs... but I'd venture he's not around Drury as much anymoreStaple was great for the Isles, but hes not nearly as plugged in with Ranger stuff.
No one is.
Drury was a part of one of the wackiest Sather days in Rongos history.As long as by "wacky" you don't mean Sather-esque... I'm probably OK w that.