Name 10People were talking about Copp and Braun.
Name 10People were talking about Copp and Braun.
Kakko, Chytil, Nemeth, '23 1st for PLD + 2nd.
I don't understand it either. I would assume he will be right there with both of them if not more expensive.Trocheck is better than Copp and Strome so I'm not entirely understanding why he would be cheaper.
I wouldn't give him 2M no matter who the center is lol. Hope they let him go. Like the guy but not at that price.Also Motte signing is dependent on how much cap a 2C takes. Motte isn't going to wait too long, I wouldn't think.
I keep hearing this. Why can’t he, and if not why did we sign him?I don’t think he can anchor our third line as C. That puts him as a third line winger or 4C plus PK. I don’t know if that’s worth $3.6m in the cap era.
part of it is he is 29 years old, and the other part is he has only played more than 70 games one time in the last four seasons, and you guessed it, it was his contract season...I don't understand it either. I would assume he will be right there with both of them if not more expensive.
So that sounds good. 'Be bold make a move'. But what if those moves cripple his flexibility moving forward or rip apart the cupboard of future assets?
Miller may cost a TON and cripple their future cap with an older player on a high dollar contract
Kadri would be a crippling older player contract
Copp/Trochek/Strome are all top-6 players with some warts and may require an overpay we all will be uncomfortable with
Bennett may not be moved
Malkin may only move from Pittsburgh if given a 4 year deal at 36 years old
What if all of these things occur, which is possible. Does he force something and overpay? Does he just pay someone like Trochek $7m per season if needed knowing it will be crippling? Or does he take a breath, retain his ammunition in terms of cap space and assets until the right opportunity presents itself and look to improve other areas?
Good questions, both.I keep hearing this. Why can’t he, and if not why did we sign him?
The only flexibility the Rangers need going forward is the space to bridge Lafreniere & Miller next year. None of the other young players have shown anything to make me think they are untouchable. Adding a center like Kadri or Miller makes the Rangers the clear favorites in the Metro and potentially the Eastern Conference.
I keep harping on it but its a 3 year window right now until Igor's salary doubles and we have to retool. Future flexibility means squat if we dont win in the near term.
There's another, longer, window after that retool anyway. Panarin will age out, Shesty will get an improved contract, the kids will hit their primes, new stars will come in. All's good.The only flexibility the Rangers need going forward is the space to bridge Lafreniere & Miller next year. None of the other young players have shown anything to make me think they are untouchable. Adding a center like Kadri or Miller makes the Rangers the clear favorites in the Metro and potentially the Eastern Conference.
I keep harping on it but its a 3 year window right now until Igor's salary doubles and we have to retool. Future flexibility means squat if we dont win in the near term.
I don't think we'll get clarity on this until he meets with the media at training camp, but we still haven't heard that VK has officially rescinded his trade request.Maybe, but what if someone like Miller or Kadri's contract demands mean killing that 2nd window before it comes.
I disagree about Lafreniere and Miller being the only players who may need a pay day next year. hat if Chytil takes a step and puts up 50+ points? What is Kravtsov comes in and scores 40-45 points as a rookie? Both of those guys will need contracts.
Again, I'm not saying one path needs to be followed explicitly, just that there needs to be some sort of nuanced take here. It can't just be, sign someone and hope it works out.
Maybe, but what if someone like Miller or Kadri's contract demands mean killing that 2nd window before it comes.
I disagree about Lafreniere and Miller being the only players who may need a pay day next year. hat if Chytil takes a step and puts up 50+ points? What is Kravtsov comes in and scores 40-45 points as a rookie? Both of those guys will need contracts.
Again, I'm not saying one path needs to be followed explicitly, just that there needs to be some sort of nuanced take here. It can't just be, sign someone and hope it works out.
There's another, longer, window after that retool anyway. Panarin will age out, Shesty will get an improved contract, the kids will hit their primes, new stars will come in. All's good.
so it would seem if we actually dont want coop or strome than you just lumped trochek in with them haTrocheck has 245 regular season games in his last 4 seasons. Copp has 259. Strome has 263. Don't see a massive difference here.
Their top picks > our top picks.The biggest boom potential cap wise in the next 3 (or was it 2) years of flat cap is keeping most of the kids and letting them improve on ELCs and RFAs. You axe 2 kids worth of cap for a would be declining big C UFA get and that's raising the floor but lowering the ceiling. Are you really getting through Colorado by snapping up has beens on the FA market? Colorado sure didn't.
The biggest boom potential cap wise in the next 3 (or was it 2) years of flat cap is keeping most of the kids and letting them improve on ELCs and RFAs. You axe 2 kids worth of cap for a would be declining big C UFA get and that's raising the floor but lowering the ceiling. Are you really getting through Colorado by snapping up has beens on the FA market? Colorado sure didn't.