17futurecap
Registered User
He got sent to another tax free state where he will live in a rich suburb outside of a great city, sounds like a nice outcome for him.
See the problem is you're picturing Brisebois saying it in a mean voice in your head.I think there’s a difference between explaining it’s an option than threatening to cut him if he doesn’t do what they want.
"Buddy, pal, come on"See the problem is you're picturing Brisebois saying it in a mean voice in your head.
Tennessee also no tax stateI wonder why McDonagh was willing to waive from a no tax state on a Cup contender to go to Nashville, I’ve heard it’s impossible to get veterans to waive.
See the problem is you're picturing Brisebois saying it in a mean voice in your head.
Look you can want to trade Kakko for Dach all you want. But this is 100%, undeniably false.I would move Kakko for Dach and never think twice. Dach is also a lot more physical and a more complete player
Yeah, if there is an agreement with Columbus about waivers, then that crosses a line. I missed Kypreos mention that "commitment". I do doubt that happened though. It wouldn't need to. McDonagh is a smart guy. If Columbus is willing to give up a third rounder to take him on (or whatever it was), I'm sure they would be willing to spend the waiver fee to do so. His agent can tell him the waiver order. He can definitely identify the option that gives him the least control.No. The problem is the alleged agreement with another team to claim him after they waive him. It defeats the purpose of the NTC. You can then effectively imply any player with a NTC that doesn't have a NMC can be sent to the team number one in the waiver priority whenever desired by waiving them and asking them to claim him. If it's a cap dump that's the end of it. If it's a real deal they can make some secondary deal in the future to equal out the compensation. I think the NHLPA would have an issue with teams waiving players with NTCs and then having Arizona (or whoever is #1 at the time) constantly claim them. It circumvents the NTC.
Look you can want to trade Kakko for Dach all you want. But this is 100%, undeniably false.
Well, yeah, it is just common sense. If the Rangers wanted to move Kreider, but he didn't want to waive for a team, you can sure bet it doesn't take 20 years of experience in the industry to deduce that Columbus would claim him for free on waivers.No. The problem is the alleged agreement with another team to claim him after they waive him. It defeats the purpose of the NTC. You can then effectively imply any player with a NTC that doesn't have a NMC can be sent to the team number one in the waiver priority whenever desired by waiving them and asking them to claim him. If it's a cap dump that's the end of it. If it's a real deal they can make some secondary deal in the future to equal out the compensation. I think the NHLPA would have an issue with teams waiving players with NTCs and then having Arizona (or whoever is #1 at the time) constantly claim them. It circumvents the NTC.
Think Kulak will be out of that depth D price range.I can totally see the Rangers signing Kulak or Robert Hagg as the depth D. No info just a hunch.
The latest Armchair GM silliness i've found:
FOR
- Othmann, Brennan
- Kakko, Kaapo [RFA Rights]
- Chytil, Filip
- Nemeth, Patrik
- Kravtsov, Vitali
- 2023 1st round pick (NYR)
Additional Details:
- Larkin, Dylan
- Zadina, Filip
Larkin moved due to contract extension issue ..signs extension 4 Rangers
If you want a good laugh, look at the packages proposed by the Vancouver fans for JT Miller?
Dach has put up almost identical numbers as Kakko while averaging 2 minutes more per game.Look you can want to trade Kakko for Dach all you want. But this is 100%, undeniably false.
Rather use that ammo for someone with more term control and someone who excels at the center position, rather than can just play it if needed but is better suited on the wingLundkvist and a protected first is all I’d offer. Maybe throw in a lower prospect if they retain
its the reason players want a NMC with that full NTC. Because it prevents that action.Well, yeah, it is just common sense. If the Rangers wanted to move Kreider, but he didn't want to waive for a team, you can sure bet it doesn't take 20 years of experience in the industry to deduce that Columbus would claim him for free on waivers.
"Hey Columbus, do you want to trade for McDonagh?"
"No, we don't, but if he popped up on waivers we'd probably claim him"
It isn't circumventing, it is an effect of exercising your full NTC.
Well, we lost Grier.
C'mon, do Drury a solid. Hertl for Nemeth and Georgiev.
The last scenario gets my vote.I don’t know about you guys but I’m interested to see how long the 2C mystery box lingers this summer. Does Drury pull the trigger by the Draft? Does he wait till Day 1 FA? Day 2? August? Pulls up in September and realizes Chytil is ready after visiting him Rocky Balboa style in the middle of nowhere in Czechia?