Speculation: Roster Building Thread - Off-season Part I

  • Xenforo Cloud will be upgrading us to version 2.3.5 on March 3rd at 12 AM GMT. This version has increased stability and fixes several bugs. We expect downtime for the duration of the update. The admin team will continue to work on existing issues, templates and upgrade all necessary available addons to minimize impact of this new version. Click Here for Updates
Status
Not open for further replies.
See the problem is you're picturing Brisebois saying it in a mean voice in your head.

No. The problem is the alleged agreement with another team to claim him after they waive him. It defeats the purpose of the NTC. You can then effectively imply any player with a NTC that doesn't have a NMC can be sent to the team number one in the waiver priority whenever desired by waiving them and asking them to claim him. If it's a cap dump that's the end of it. If it's a real deal they can make some secondary deal in the future to equal out the compensation. I think the NHLPA would have an issue with teams waiving players with NTCs and then having Arizona (or whoever is #1 at the time) constantly claim them. It circumvents the NTC.
 
No. The problem is the alleged agreement with another team to claim him after they waive him. It defeats the purpose of the NTC. You can then effectively imply any player with a NTC that doesn't have a NMC can be sent to the team number one in the waiver priority whenever desired by waiving them and asking them to claim him. If it's a cap dump that's the end of it. If it's a real deal they can make some secondary deal in the future to equal out the compensation. I think the NHLPA would have an issue with teams waiving players with NTCs and then having Arizona (or whoever is #1 at the time) constantly claim them. It circumvents the NTC.
Yeah, if there is an agreement with Columbus about waivers, then that crosses a line. I missed Kypreos mention that "commitment". I do doubt that happened though. It wouldn't need to. McDonagh is a smart guy. If Columbus is willing to give up a third rounder to take him on (or whatever it was), I'm sure they would be willing to spend the waiver fee to do so. His agent can tell him the waiver order. He can definitely identify the option that gives him the least control.
 
  • Like
Reactions: egelband
The latest Armchair GM silliness i've found:
  1. Othmann, Brennan
  2. Kakko, Kaapo [RFA Rights]
  3. Chytil, Filip
  4. Nemeth, Patrik
  5. Kravtsov, Vitali
  6. 2023 1st round pick (NYR)
FOR
  1. Larkin, Dylan
  2. Zadina, Filip
Additional Details:
Larkin moved due to contract extension issue ..signs extension 4 Rangers
 
No. The problem is the alleged agreement with another team to claim him after they waive him. It defeats the purpose of the NTC. You can then effectively imply any player with a NTC that doesn't have a NMC can be sent to the team number one in the waiver priority whenever desired by waiving them and asking them to claim him. If it's a cap dump that's the end of it. If it's a real deal they can make some secondary deal in the future to equal out the compensation. I think the NHLPA would have an issue with teams waiving players with NTCs and then having Arizona (or whoever is #1 at the time) constantly claim them. It circumvents the NTC.
Well, yeah, it is just common sense. If the Rangers wanted to move Kreider, but he didn't want to waive for a team, you can sure bet it doesn't take 20 years of experience in the industry to deduce that Columbus would claim him for free on waivers.

"Hey Columbus, do you want to trade for McDonagh?"
"No, we don't, but if he popped up on waivers we'd probably claim him"

It isn't circumventing, it is an effect of exercising your full NTC.
 
  • Like
Reactions: pld459666
The latest Armchair GM silliness i've found:
  1. Othmann, Brennan
  2. Kakko, Kaapo [RFA Rights]
  3. Chytil, Filip
  4. Nemeth, Patrik
  5. Kravtsov, Vitali
  6. 2023 1st round pick (NYR)
FOR
  1. Larkin, Dylan
  2. Zadina, Filip
Additional Details:
Larkin moved due to contract extension issue ..signs extension 4 Rangers

The Rangers have big plans for Othmann. He was also Drury's first pick. He was projected as a Chris Kunitz type aka a productive sidekick you can play with the stars.

Him and Kravtsov are going to get auditions for the Vatrano role.

Vegas has still been super quiet. No cap room and Roy, Kolesar, and even Patrick with the former two needing new contracts. Roy/Kolesar could really help the Rangers.
 
Look you can want to trade Kakko for Dach all you want. But this is 100%, undeniably false.
Dach has put up almost identical numbers as Kakko while averaging 2 minutes more per game.
Kakko has better defensive numbers and better offensive numbers.
 
Lundkvist and a protected first is all I’d offer. Maybe throw in a lower prospect if they retain
Rather use that ammo for someone with more term control and someone who excels at the center position, rather than can just play it if needed but is better suited on the wing
 
Minus Strome I don't see this team changing much. We have cap issues so we need Chytil and Kakko and most of the other cheap talent ppl seem to want to trade. Any 2c upgrade is going to make things really tight and the rangers will lose too much depth for my liking. Maybe you can package Chytil and something minor for another young center but it'll be a gamble if that center will be any better than Chytil. Strome with a hip injury made the decision to move on from him even easier...and it was already pretty easy. I like Copp but his concussion history scares me and he'll be a little too expensive. Chytil's center game took a step in the right direction this past season. I think he finally gets a chance in the top six and runs away with it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CLW
Well, yeah, it is just common sense. If the Rangers wanted to move Kreider, but he didn't want to waive for a team, you can sure bet it doesn't take 20 years of experience in the industry to deduce that Columbus would claim him for free on waivers.

"Hey Columbus, do you want to trade for McDonagh?"
"No, we don't, but if he popped up on waivers we'd probably claim him"

It isn't circumventing, it is an effect of exercising your full NTC.
its the reason players want a NMC with that full NTC. Because it prevents that action.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Alluckks
This is why I never understood Drury’s handling of the DeAngelo situation.
Don’t buy him out; waive him.
If he gets claimed, win, he’s off the books.
If he doesn’t get claimed; send him to Hartford.
If you’re worried about him poisoning the Wolfpack well. Than make him a healthy scratch.
Last year we had cap space to burn. Worst case scenario, if he hadn’t been claimed, you buy him out this year.
It’s just business.
 
I don’t know about you guys but I’m interested to see how long the 2C mystery box lingers this summer. Does Drury pull the trigger by the Draft? Does he wait till Day 1 FA? Day 2? August? Pulls up in September and realizes Chytil is ready after visiting him Rocky Balboa style in the middle of nowhere in Czechia?
 
I don’t know about you guys but I’m interested to see how long the 2C mystery box lingers this summer. Does Drury pull the trigger by the Draft? Does he wait till Day 1 FA? Day 2? August? Pulls up in September and realizes Chytil is ready after visiting him Rocky Balboa style in the middle of nowhere in Czechia?
The last scenario gets my vote.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Anthony5967
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad