Salary cap.The Bruins depth vs our depth was on serious display tonight, and it wasn’t pretty. The reality is in the NHL, there’s only so much room for big contracts. That means you need to make the bottom of your lineup as cost-effective as possible. We have the high priced guys. We have the guys on ELCs. We even have some great players on low cost second contracts.
The big issue is our low priced depth is absolute garbage against good teams. We desperately need a cheap, veteran defenseman to sure up our 7. Someone that can mentor the bottom pair and even push into the top 4 if someone isn’t playing well. Boston has Anton Stralman for $1m. We’ve made the idiotic decision to ride with Libor Hajek.
Goodrow, Blais, Carpenter, and Reaves are all replacement level players. The lack of cost efficiency when you sum up all those cap hits is egregious. You can’t build depth with so many bad low-priced contracts. Not to mention, their inconsistency requires us to carry an extra F most nights. Motte is literally what people thought Goodrow would be, except without the salary premium of a Cup winner. Rydahl could do exactly what Carpenter does and also is waivers exempt. Two really poor decisions there.
Drury did an incredible job at the deadline last year getting the most out of depth acquisitions to sure up holes. He was dreadful in attempting to do the same this off-season. A lack of cap space I guess can be blamed, but sometimes you need to make the tough decision to move contracts that need moving instead of just accepting them as requirements (ie. Reaves). In a flat cap world, the fringes of your lineup need to be close to perfect. Ours are really, really bad. It’s the difference between a good team and a great one, like Boston.
Drury had a boatload of accrued cap space at the deadline last March.
Drury had no money this summer.