bleedblue94
Registered User
- Joined
- Jun 8, 2004
- Messages
- 9,884
- Likes
- 10,906
dear god you're right, i thought matthews and mcdavid were above him but matthews isnt...AKCTHUALLY he's the 2nd highest
dear god you're right, i thought matthews and mcdavid were above him but matthews isnt...AKCTHUALLY he's the 2nd highest
Laying out an 80 million dollar payroll with next to zero revenue seems pretty sacrificial and creative to me.That is a direct result of how they chose to approach their operating/financial response to the pandemic. They could have agreed to a different solution that was more protective of future league operating conditions, but it would have required additional sacrifice or creativity on the part of the owners.
That's easy, you don't trade a 1st for Braun because he's not worth it and you can get him for way less than that. You trade firsts for players who are worth that high amount.
Go back and look at the teams that has won recently. Avs traded away their first. Tampa traded away multiple firsts. Chicago has done it. Pittsburgh did it. St. Louis. Some of these are for players with term. Some of them were rentals. Rangers don't have a recent history of trading 1sts for guys without term, but when you have 2 that makes it way more palatable and likely.
If you have a chance to win, picks should not be off limits for the right player. If you are a middling or mediocre team, then you keep them. Pretty simple.
It is if they win. Not a guarantee by any means but if this team is good, then it would absolutely be worth it to make them even better.You are omitting what makes him worth it or not: the player you are getting in return when you use the selection to draft.
8 weeks of Kane isn’t worth it either.
Nice reference. I totally thought about going as him for Halloween.AKCTHUALLY he's the 2nd highest
Yep. everybody appreciates there is a cba. A portion of us think it’s proving to be a one-sided deal.Nobody forgets that at all, but the way the league is managing the cap increases is absurd. What Larry is proposing should've been discussed when the CBA was hammered out in 2020. Nobody had the foresight to see this was going to be a giant problem in just 2 years? Seems unlikely, when we have to watch these glitchy ads on the boards that the NHL claims have been in development for 7 years before rolling them out.
The NHL had a problem with paying 3rd liners like Bobby Holik 9M a year, 20 years ago. I understood it then, but it's been the owners mission to suppress wages since the grand lockout of 04-05. Once the players caved & agreed to the hard cap, the owners have kept them over that barrel.
Wouldn’t it be grand if general manager Chris Drury could enter the deadline in a position of strength without being obligated to move either or both of his 2023 first-rounders or any of the young blue-chippers within the organization?
There are nearly five months to go until the March 3 trade deadline. Twists and turns lay ahead. But if Lafreniere and Kakko can ride the baseline they have established this week and maintain their status as productive top-six right wings, the Rangers may have no need to raise Kane.
To go truly deep, the wild cards include D's 5 through 7.Suddenly no longer worried about 1RW. I think the wild card is the third line and 7D.
I’m pretty sure that if you can stick around after your club aids and abets a sexual predator then a poor Kane return is a walk in the park.I just don't believe that Blackhawks management could sell their fanbase on such a poor return for a future iconic Hall-of-Famer and multiple Cup winner. Even in a rebuild they'd expect way more for Kane.
Exactly. We're still an injury away from Hajek starting in the playoffs, and/or Reaves playing most nights. That's not a good formula come Spring.Suddenly no longer worried about 1RW. I think the wild card is the third line and 7D.
PK or PP? Hard to argue to put them on the PP right now as good as it is looking. I wouldn't hate Laf and Kakko being a PK team. Mika and Kreider as the other.Lafreniere is tied for 2nd on the team for even strength points amongst forwards.
5th on the team in hits.
54% CF.
Kakko's possession numbers are insane. He's currently over 61% CF.
These two are not getting enough ice time.
Lafreniere is tied for 2nd on the team for even strength points amongst forwards.
5th on the team in hits.
54% CF.
Kakko's possession numbers are insane. He's currently over 61% CF.
These two are not getting enough ice time.
We will one day look back on this team and be amazed at the amount of talent on it. The next 2-3 years are their best chance to win it all because they absolutely can.
How would you or others compare this squad to the 1991-92 Rangers?
That seriously was the most talented group of forwards in my lifetime. And their D was top heavy (Leetch, Patrick Beuk).
Assuming Kravstov is RW3, potential 3rd line combos: Choose
Goodrow Chytil Kravstov
Blais Chytil Kravstov
Vesey Chytil Kravstov
Assuming Kravstov is RW3, potential 3rd line combos: Choose
Goodrow Chytil Kravstov
Blais Chytil Kravstov
Vesey Chytil Kravstov