- Jul 16, 2005
- 14,857
- 13,012
Minnesota wants centers badly. A few Wild fans were interested in trading Pit's 1st for Strome. Gorton, pick up the phone quick!!!
Interesting.
Minnesota wants centers badly. A few Wild fans were interested in trading Pit's 1st for Strome. Gorton, pick up the phone quick!!!
I think 6-6.5, personally... 7 years.Buchnevich is making $3.25 now and is having a great season. And you believe he should make no less than $1m increase? You really think that this is a realistic statement? The kid is going to get $5-5.5. And rightfully so.
And wait? You actually believe that the reason that DeAngelo is not getting moved is his contract and not toxicity? Teams did not need to conduct their own due diligence to see that. They ALL walked away after the due diligence.
That may well be. I started the year believing that barring the wheels completely falling off the bus, that he is finishing the year and will be at the helm to start the year next year. I thought that they would be a bubble team for most of the year, which means that the chances of them making the playoffs were just as good as them missing the playoffs. Given the injuries, the DeAngelo situation, the Panarin situation and the fact that Zibanejad has the same amount of points as Ryan Lindgren, they are about where I expected them to be.
You can't project value if ignoring that... 25 too... he has very high worth. To anyone.No one is arguing that. I'm arguing who's paying him that.
People's personal expectations are entirely up to them. For example, you expected a good deal more out of Lafreniere. To me, not playing 10 months before, his play has been about on par with what I expected. Sure he could have more points, but there is some awful puck luck also going aroundI expected a good deal more lightning out of Kakko and Lafreniere.
Last year, I said that if they need to trade him, it will be a part of something very big. Then they drafted Schneider. Then Lundqvist continued to take steps forward. Then this year began. Then the crap with DeAngelo started.
Evaluations are made on beliefs given what the fact pattern looks like at the time.
All depends on Zibanejad's and Chytil's second halves of the season. We'd be bringing in RNH to be a 2c, not the number one guy. If they don't plan on extending Zib/he never recovers his form, and Chytil doesn't progress towards what looks like a #1 center, you're going to end up with a team that has 3 "2nd" line centers again.
Ok you're right. He's on pace for 68 pts, plays PP and PK, has become a 200 ft player and has a bit of an edge to him without taking stupid penalties. I'm sure the market for him will be a Brandon Tanev level contract.
You want comparables?
Oliver Bjorkstrand, a player who has produced less for a shorter time period, just signed a 5 year, $5.4m per year contract in January 2021, as an RFA.
Dadonov signed for 3 years at $5m per year in October 2020 as a UFA.
Burakovsky, 2 years at $4.9m per year in October 2020 as an RFA.
Kevin LaBanc, 4 years at $4.725 per year in October 2020 as an RFA.
Right now 6m would be a discount,
Halak show tonightRask out tonight
Even with a flat cap, I would bet RNH gets closer to 7M or even more. 5.5M is way too low.I agree.
Here would be the thought process behind that though, and bare with me, it's a lot of shuffling:
Deadline:
To Vegas:
Zubanejad
To NYR:
Krebs + Reaves + Holden + Vegas 1st '21
Off-season:
Rangers sign RNH @ 5.5m for 6 years
Rangers trade Kravtsov + Lemieux + Jones + Vegas 1st '21 for Larkin
Rangers trade Strome to Ottawa for 2nd '21 + 3rd '22
Rangers re-sign Buch @ $5.25m for 4 years
Opening night roster:
Panarin-Larkin-Kaako
Kreider-RNH-Buch
Lafreniere-Chytil-Gauthier
Barron-Rooney-Reaves
Blackwell
Lindgren-Fox
Miller-Trouba
Hajek/Reunanen-Lundqvist
Holden
Even with a flat cap, I would bet RNH gets closer to 7M or even more. 5.5M is way too low.
have you heard anything regarding our RFAs? any numbers floating around?He's been hanging in that 60-70 point zone for a few years. Your guess is likely closer.
You're 100% entitled to think that... but look, a consistently effective, top-six W, long-considered-to-be 1st. line talent, coming off an ELC isn't going to take 1-2 year deal, which is more appropriate for what you're saying, IMO.There is no way Buch is getting more than 5-5.5 per year, if that's the number, trade him
have you heard anything regarding our RFAs? any numbers floating around?
Any word on if the team plans on bringing Kravtsov to NY this season?
That will likely be the number, most of his comparables are in the same range. If the Rangers can sign him for 5M per I would be pretty happy about that.There is no way Buch is getting more than 5-5.5 per year, if that's the number, trade him
End the year something like this:
Panarin-Zibanejad-Buchnevich
Kreider-Chytil-Kakko
Lafreniere-Strome-Kravtsov
Lemieux-Bennett-Gauthier/Blackbeard
Rooney
Trade 2 reclamations as in Howden+ to Calgary for Bennett
If would try to make another trade with Vancouver as well for youngish sandpaper depth on fwd
I Zib were to waive (doubtful) - sending him to Vegas ($$ retained) for one of their young centers and an upper echelon draft pick has to be an option as well.
Get another good 1st round pick
Buyout ADA
Sign all the RFAS to reasonable deals at a MAX of 4 years.
Amass young attractive assets...
Then you have the foundation for a very interesting offseason as capstrapped teams will begin unloading plenty of contracts. And paying dearly for it.
Even with a flat cap, I would bet RNH gets closer to 7M or even more. 5.5M is way too low.
To me w Larkin it all comes down to what his next contract is gonna look like.
I think the argument that the NYR already have elite Ws (or at least their only choice is to operate under the assumption that they do) and therefore would be well served with a “1B” center makes sense. Provided that 1B is paid appropriately.
Larkin at ~$7M long term feels about right. $6M even better. Giving up major assets for Larkin at $8-9M would be the tipping point to looking like a really bad deal IMO.
In all likelihood his minutes at ES but more importantly from a pts/$ standpoint the PP will get cut here a la Trouba. They can’t fall into the same trap of valuing a player based on their production under old usage that is likely to change on the NYR.
Sure. But he did not require the trade of a first round player to be had. And MOST of the players taken in the draft do not make it.Yes but your habitual blind spot is not recognizing that those young kids are gonna be found in the draft and take steps sooner rather than later. "WHO" is your constant hypothetical.
We didn't know who, but it was Schneider, a "future."