Speculation: Roster Building Thread LIII: Free Agent Frenzy

  • Xenforo Cloud has upgraded us to version 2.3.6. Please report any issues you experience.
Status
Not open for further replies.
I am fine with moving Kreider, but I think we missed the boat on moving him this offseason. He is a deadline deal IMO

Don't see this as the case at all.

Market is still there for him beyond Colorado and will be even stronger in a week or so. Kreider even at his full cap hit is going to be appealing to contending teams.

It should be simple to open up space though...

- Vesey and Kreider traded, Staal bought out, Smith waived, Shatty as the 7th.
 
  • Like
Reactions: wafflepadsave
Would not be surprised if they moved Beleskey in this case. I think some team like Detroit would take on his 825K cap hit if buried for a later pick.
Totally agree here. You find a team who does not have cap problems. Attach a 5th/6th round pick to him. He only has 1 year left.

So you move:

Vesey
Namestnikov
Buyout one of Smith/Shatty

Panarin- $11.5
Trouba- $8
Buch- $3-3.5 @ 2-3 years
ADA- $2.5 @ 2-3 years
Lemmy- $1.5-2
 
If I am a GM, I am closely watching the Rangers and how it shakes out with Panarin. Should the Rangers sign Panarin, I'd immediately offer sheet Buchnevich.
For the Rangers not to be able to match, the salary would have to be in the $4.2-6.xxx range.

That is a 1st and 3rd round pick compensation.

How do we feel about that?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Gardner McKay
For how much?

That's the tricky part. If I had to guess, 6 years x 4.5 million per year. I don't know that the Rangers want to commit to him that long, you give up a 1st round pick if the Rangers don't match and based on what Miller just went for, that isn't a bad deal. If he continues to progress you could have a steal of a cap hit in a year or two.
 
  • Like
Reactions: wafflepadsave
They're going to want more than 500,000 in space.

Panarin and Zibanejad should be split apart and people need to come to grips with Kreider leaving.

If they're adding Panarin to Trouba this offseason, I'd much rather they keep Kreider and ship Buch, Names and Vesey out. Kreider's a better player than all three honestly. Doubt Buch or Vesey will ever be as good or as important to the team as Kreider is right now or three years down the road.
 
I like the "don't sign Panarin so you have to do a bunch of jiggery pokery that allows for no room of error or change of direction" but that's just me
 
For the Rangers not to be able to match, the salary would have to be in the $4.2-6.xxx range.

That is a 1st and 3rd round pick compensation.

How do we feel about that?
Not bad. That would mean that we signed Panarin which, would definitely soften the blow. Offer sheet picks are completely unprotected which is another plus.

With all the talk of offer sheets this year (and it is significantly more than in years past) I don't think it would be someone like Marner. No team is giving up 4 1st round picks for anyone except for McDavid. I don't care how good Marner is. It would be someone like Buchnevich.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RGY
If they're adding Panarin to Trouba this offseason, I'd much rather they keep Kreider and ship Buch, Names and Vesey out. Kreider's a better player than all three honestly. Doubt Buch or Vesey will ever be as good or as important to the team as Kreider is right now of three years down the road.
There is no room for Kreider imo. Even if they let Strome walk after this year and cap goes up.
 
Not bad. That would mean that we signed Panarin which, would definitely soften the blow. Offer sheet picks are completely unprotected which is another plus.

With all the talk of offer sheets this year (and it is significantly more than in years past) I don't think it would be someone like Marner. No team is giving up 4 1st round picks for anyone except for McDavid. I don't care how good Marner is. It would be someone like Buchnevich.
At the same time, for all the talk i feel as though you might see teams still very hesitant given the quality of the 2020 draft. Too much parity in the NHL to guarantee giving up that pick wont come back to haunt you.
 
If they're adding Panarin to Trouba this offseason, I'd much rather they keep Kreider and ship Buch, Names and Vesey out. Kreider's a better player than all three honestly. Doubt Buch or Vesey will ever be as Kreider is or will be three years down the road.

Vesey is toast regardless but Kreider doesn't make sense for the long term.

Those are dollars you're going to wish you had 2-3-4 years down the line.
 
I am fine with moving Kreider, but I think we missed the boat on moving him this offseason. He is a deadline deal IMO

I would not go that far, I'd say the boat which contained them getting a guaranteed 1st has sailed unless they wait until the deadline.

A 1st that is conditional and somewhat protected should that pick end up at some arbitrary early draft slot I would assume is still possible.

I don't think any team is going to trade their 2020 1st outright now, maybe at the deadline.

Yet that does not mean the Rangers can not try to find some equivalent value to that 1st. Which the equivalency if it does happen will be much debated whether one for one or within a trade with more moving parts.
 
There is no room for Kreider imo. Even if they let Strome walk after this year and cap goes up.

I'm not a cap guy so I defer to you. Isn't a ton of money coming off the books after two years when Staal, Hank, Shat and Smith are done? But if adding Panarin is going to cause so many headaches two and a half years into the rebuild, that gives me pause.
 
At the same time, for all the talk i feel as though you might see teams still very hesitant given the quality of the 2020 draft. Too much parity in the NHL to guarantee giving up that pick wont come back to haunt you.
While I think that is a good point, a team offer sheeting Buchnevich likely believes they are going to be a serious contender in 2020. Getting a top 6 forward locked up for ~$4.5 million for 6 years, when you see guys like Hayes and Kane getting 7+ over 7 years has a ton of value in itself.

Also, I would mention that Vancouver just traded a 2020 1st for JT Miller. While Jim Benning isn't quite the brightest crayon in the box, he is no Chiarelli either. Picks will be moved for the right players.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RGY
Well if you get taxed in the state you worked in then you only get half the games in fla and have to pay taxes in the other states you play in on the road so the tax savings are half of what people keep talking about. It’s certainly not worth signing for a small market team that draws 10k on a good night and hasn’t sniffed a playoff series win in god knows how long. I’d be shocked if he signed in fla.

Buy a place down there for the off-season and live like a king in NYC with your model GF and the hockey world watching. Pretty simple decision. Which is why big free agents don’t run to the Panthers over big market teams if they have a choice.
 
Vesey is toast regardless but Kreider doesn't make sense for the long term.

Those are dollars you're going to wish you had 2-3-4 years down the line.

If Kreider doesn't make sense long term how does Panarin? They're roughly the same age. Physically speaking, my money is on Kreider lasting longer in this league than Panarin. Or, keep both. I'm sure they can make the money work.
 
Not a tax attorney or anything but I work in financial services in a field that is heavily impacted by mobility taxation and the like (tax withholding for employees who work/live in multiple tax jurisdictions).

A players residence, at least with regard to NY taxes, would have no bearing on the tax due to NY. They are employed in NY, and would have to pay NY tax on the income. A signing bonus would be considered taxable income the same as salary, I am fairly certain there is no distinction from a tax point of view. There may be some factors involved that could potentially reduce the tax liability since the player isn't employed for all 12 months, technically, which could save them from potentially being taxed for the offseason (ie, they have to pay 9/12ths of the NY tax rate since they only work a portion of the year in NY) although I suspect even that would be a tough sell for an accountant since they are a contract employee who is paid their entire salary for ~9 months work.

Also as someone else pointed out, there's a good chance the signing bonus is still subject to jock tax in other jurisdictions as way. I wouldn't bet money on this but its certainly a possibility.
 
Last edited:
That's the tricky part. If I had to guess, 6 years x 4.5 million per year. I don't know that the Rangers want to commit to him that long, you give up a 1st round pick if the Rangers don't match and based on what Miller just went for, that isn't a bad deal. If he continues to progress you could have a steal of a cap hit in a year or two.
That's an easy deal to match. I would be ecstatic with the possibility of locking Buch in at 4.5M for the next 6 seasons.
 
Don't see this as the case at all.

Market is still there for him beyond Colorado and will be even stronger in a week or so. Kreider even at his full cap hit is going to be appealing to contending teams.

It should be simple to open up space though...

- Vesey and Kreider traded, Staal bought out, Smith waived, Shatty as the 7th.
There are plenty of ways to skin a cat. The Staal buyout gives me pause though.

for the record, I want Panarin.
 
  • Like
Reactions: FIRE DRURY
Not a tax attorney or anything but I work in financial services in a field that is heavily impact by mobility taxation and the like (tax withholding for employees who work/live in multiple tax jurisdictions).

A players residence, at least with regard to NY taxes, would have no bearing on the tax due to NY. They are employed in NY, and would have to pay NY tax on the income. A signing bonus would be considered taxable income the same as salary, I am fairly certain there is no distinction from a tax point of view. There may be some factors involved that could potentially reduce the tax liability since the player isn't employed for all 12 months, technically, which could save them from potentially being taxed for the offseason (ie, they have to pay 9/12ths of the NY tax rate since they only work a portion of the year in NY) although I suspect even that would be a tough sell for an accountant since they are a contract employee who is paid their entire salary for ~9 months work.

Also as someone else pointed out, there's a good chance the signing bonus is still subject to jock tax in other jurisdictions as way. I wouldn't bet money on this but its certainly a possibility.
Nerd.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Leetch3 and Thordic
That's an easy deal to match. I would be ecstatic with the possibility of locking Buch in at 4.5M for the next 6 seasons.

Sorry, but that is absurd. You want to commit 6 years to him? Seriously?

Look, Im all for locking up the young talent when its become/is becoming clear that they'll be a sure thing in the NHL. Buchnevich is anything but.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ETTER DE
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad