RGY
Kreid or Die
You could always make one and PM the twitter handle to the posters you would allow to follow lolThe thought has crossed my mind over the years.
You could always make one and PM the twitter handle to the posters you would allow to follow lolThe thought has crossed my mind over the years.
Personally, I wouldn't want to trade Buchnevich unless we are getting a MASSIVE return.
After getting benched by Quinn at the all-star break and stepping up his play, he scored 23 points in the last 32 games of the year. That's a 60 point pace. If you want to cherry pick, over the last 10 games of the season, he scored 9 points. That's a 70 point pace.
So you've got a kid who has already put up and sustained top line production for a half a season. The fact that it's the most recent half a season is especially relevant because it could be the best reflection of the player he is now. Put differently, if he can sustain what he did for the last half of the season, Buch is currently a first line player. Right now. He just turned 24 2 months ago.
Buch turning into a first line player would not be surprising. Before coming over to the US, he put up the 2nd highest scoring U20 KHL season of players currently in the NHL. That's better than Panarin and Tarasenko, who have been cornerstone players on cup-contending teams. The most similar prospects to Buch in terms of league and production - Kuznetsov, Tarasenko, and Panarin - didn't have their breakout NHL seasons until they were 23, 23, and 24. That's basically exactly the same Buchnevich is now / was when he turned it on and produced at a 1st line rate for the second half of the season.
There's always uncertainty with young players and Buch having a strong half a season doesn't guarantee anything, but I think there's a lot of cause to believe that he could be in the middle of breaking out as a first line caliber player. Again, he's 24. So I worry that if we trade Buch, we could be trading a young, controlled first line player basically right as he breaks out. That's the exact opposite of what you want to do in a rebuild. Personally, I would need a HUGE return to forego that upside.
@Edge if there's a reason the Rangers might view him differently, or there are some holes in my thinking, I'd be curious if you could plug in what you think those might be.
Probably not. Would love to come away with two centers, but that's being greedy.
Kreider/Vesey plus a lower prospect (someone below Chytil/Andersson - maybe Rykov/Reunanon/Lindgren?) for 7 though? I would like that. Probably being too unrealistic.
I hope no one is freaking out. And everyone is just humoring and enjoying themselvesI got a better idea.
@Edge tells me everything, I keep all of it secret and laugh while I get to watch everyone else freak out.
Not naming any names, you understand.Generally speaking, teams sometimes find themselves in a position where they like some of the depth and flexibility they have at a particular position and find themselves at a point where other teams are asking about a player who is part of that depth.
It's plausible a team with a player like Buch could theoretically have been exploring different trade options with another player, but found there was significant interest (and opportunities) with a guy like Buch.
Who says you can’t be a New Yorker?Pizza from Naples, Italy.
I'm a New Yorker whose family is from Naples. Because I know what it is, I can't be a New Yorker? Seems strange.
DeleteGenerally speaking, teams sometimes find themselves in a position where they like some of the depth and flexibility they have at a particular position and find themselves at a point where other teams are asking about a player who is part of that depth.
It's plausible a team with a player like Buch could theoretically have been exploring different trade options with another player, but found there was significant interest (and opportunities) with a guy like Buch.
Do you think RJ Barrett and Kaapo Kakko will be best buds?
Generally speaking, teams sometimes find themselves in a position where they like some of the depth and flexibility they have at a particular position and find themselves at a point where other teams are asking about a player who is part of that depth.
It's plausible a team with a player like Buch could theoretically have been exploring different trade options with another player, but found there was significant interest (and opportunities) with a guy like Buch.
I'm not trading futures for Zucker, but if Kreider doesn't get traded for a 1st+, and we aren't intending to re-sign him, trading him for Zucker is a good idea. For us, at least. I don't know if Minnesota would agree.
I guess it comes down to, would you rather have 27 year old Zucker @ 5.5 for 4 years, or re-sign 29 year old Kreider for 5+ years @ 6.5+ per year?
That's probably the only scenario where I see us trading for Zucker.
Risto to nyr went out the window when trouba came here. Not tying up that much money into those two guysVesey, DeAngelo, Namestnikov for Ristolainen and the 31st?
Who says you can’t be a New Yorker?
That style is just way more commonly referred to as Sicilian in this area.
Who says you can’t be a New Yorker?
That style is just way more commonly referred to as Sicilian in this area.
This is really cryptic. Can anyone think of a team with a player like Buch?Generally speaking, teams sometimes find themselves in a position where they like some of the depth and flexibility they have at a particular position and find themselves at a point where other teams are asking about a player who is part of that depth.
It's plausible a team with a player like Buch could theoretically have been exploring different trade options with another player, but found there was significant interest (and opportunities) with a guy like Buch.
There is no way Buch+Vesey gets the 7OA.
Toronto proposed a deal for $11,000,000 for 8 years -- Marner camp doesn't want that term. I can't believe how bad this is going for the Leafs right now. Can't even sign your local superstar kid to a contract. I still can't see them trading Marner but if they can't resolve this, they may very well look to trade him for something before it gets even worse.
Toronto proposed a deal for $11,000,000 for 8 years -- Marner camp doesn't want that term. I can't believe how bad this is going for the Leafs right now. Can't even sign your local superstar kid to a contract. I still can't see them trading Marner but if they can't resolve this, they may very well look to trade him for something before it gets even worse.
I would use a LHD prospect if necessary. Trade any other spare parts for picks to add to the deal. It would be a coup to get Kakko and a top Center prospect from this draft.
Seems like Marner is being a ****ing dick.
Alas, I lived around the Chugoku region.Pizza is much improved in Japan these days.
this place is excellent
I tend to lean towards the players myself, but I immensely dislike the vibe I’m getting from the Marner camp. It seems like they’re being difficult for the sake of being difficult.Eh, it's funny how we side with teams on this stuff for some reason. It's a very smart career move to sign a shorter contract that leaves open the possibility of signing another longer contract for a lot of money afterwards, rather than get all your prime years tied up in one contract. He's looking out for himself, all players should do that, but I think he's gonna find this idea a tough sell