I Eat Crow
Fear The Mullet
- Jul 9, 2007
- 19,982
- 13,643
Doubtful. They're sooooo bad this year. Doubt very much Johnson or Sillinger would be even remotely available.Columbus open to dealing a young C In a Kravtsov/Jones package ?
Doubtful. They're sooooo bad this year. Doubt very much Johnson or Sillinger would be even remotely available.Columbus open to dealing a young C In a Kravtsov/Jones package ?
TBH I think Gallant is being forced to ice the team that gives them the best chance to make the playoffs. Development is not now nor never was nor ever will be a priority in this market. Every playoff game missed is a boat load of revenue lost. The market will never accept being bad just to develop young players. People come out to see huge hits, big goals and amazing saves. Not to see young Kakko learn his game eating up big minutes on the top line. Thats why the rebuild only lasted 2 seasons with Gorton, Davidson and Quinn losing thier jobs. The next season we were back in the playoffs with a new coach, new GM and a shiny new marketing campaign. No quit in NY. Which, ironically, could be said about the other 31 cities.
You're being a bit disingenuous looking only at 5v5. At even strength last year, we had 6 players who had more than 30 points, and two others with 29 points.
View attachment 619084
I've yet to see anything from Blais that suggests he can do it, but given the injury, I do expect him to be better than he has been.
My only problem with everything said in your post and the one you're replaying to, is that chytil isn't shit in his own end. That narrative was from last year. Chytil is currently very effective in both scoring, and shutting down the other teams scoring.This is the best reason I've seen for sitting Kravstov.
Ultimately its all about Panarin and you are correct. When he was with Strome, they also felt the need to put Goodrow or Hunt there because they would backcheck, be stronger on the body and be more responsible in their own zone.
When Panarin was with Trocheck you could trust that it was taken care of as well. Kravstov could be the other winger, easily in that scenario.
Its not only your astute observation about PK personnel, but its also about the tough reality that Trocheck and Panarin arent meshing well.
I personally love having Chytil up in the top 6 getting more time and having Trocheck with Kreider on the 3rd because it really spreads out the depth. But all of it is at the expense of knocking Kravstov out of the lineup.
It's disingenuous because you are purposely excluding things to make your point seem stronger.How is that disingenuous? Blais would not get a minute total of ice time at 4v4 or 3v3 so it has nothing to do with him. Even strength numbers for the top guys will of course be a lot higher than 5v5 because they play in overtime. Even strength also, for some reason, counts ENG situations Goodrow 29 ES pts, 4 PK pts, 33 total pts, 4 EN pts last year), and 5v5 does not and again blais doesn’t play there either. He’s an incredibly one dimensional player for a fourth liner considering he’s a zero on special teams and has never even been used to defend leads at the end of games.
It's disingenuous because you are purposely excluding things to make your point seem stronger.
If Goodrow can score 29 points at even strength, it isn't out of the realm of possibility that Blais could do it to. It won't be this year, but with another year of healing, maybe he can in the future.
Our prospect going to jail lol WOAT luck with prospects
Or they die. At this point I’m convinced this team is literally cursedForward prospect.
This should be the expectation going forward.
Either they leave the organization, we bring them to the NHL and screw with their heads or they go to JAIL
Doubtful. They're sooooo bad this year. Doubt very much Johnson or Sillinger would be even remotely available.
why are we trying to add a big name when last year should've shown that the path is to add to fill depth.Yea prob not
STL stinks . Barbashev maybe ?
Tarasenko at the deadline
You're being a bit disingenuous looking only at 5v5. At even strength last year, we had 6 players who had more than 30 points, and two others with 29 points.
View attachment 619084
I've yet to see anything from Blais that suggests he can do it, but given the injury, I do expect him to be better than he has been.
I was going to say that too but I felt it was a little insensitive lolOr they die. At this point I’m convinced this team is literally cursed
Pavelski is not getting dealt. Dallas is going for the Cup this year. Maybe in the summer.
You're not wrong. I've been beating the drum of the bolded for a while. It's like Panarin turned into a stereotypical Russian primadonna as soon as the Putin backed hit piece came out when he was the polar opposite before that. It's absolutely bizarre.
I don't see Kreider or Trouba waiving their NMC's this coming summer. The player that makes the most sense to trade and should be dealt is Panarin. Take him off the top power play unit and given him 3rd line ES minutes unless he earns more. He'll start sulking and want out.
Bingo. But why not play him and improve his trade value?
I like Garland the player. Has a little bit of piss and vinegar to his game and fills a position of need at a great cap number. However, unless a big contract gets moved, I don't see the Rangers having space for him, even if you spend $2 to $2.5 million each bridging Lafreniere and Miller to two year deals.
Who does Vancouver want? It's going to be the ludicrous asks from the Miller trade all over again. Schneider. Kakko. Lafreniere. They're delusional over there. Realistically? I'd offer Kravtsov and Jones. Add Colorado's 2023 3rd if they retain 25%.
We are making excuses for why Blais hasn't produced, and this is fine. Tearing his knee up like he did does take time to fully recover.
With that being said, wouldn't part of the recovery/strengthening process be that he needs rest? He isn't playing a ton of minutes, but the intensity is there. The preparation to play is there. Having him rotate in and out so he can work on his game, as well as continue to build more strength and durability for the knee would be beneficial to the player.
Then you have the ability to get Blais in a better spot while giving you the ability to rotate guys in and out of the lineup to see what you have. It makes no sense to me that Blais playing 8-10 minutes a night and no rest is a good way for him to recover. Wouldn't it make sense to have some additional recovery time and also being able to work with the training staff on making him more comfortable?
why are we trying to add a big name when last year should've shown that the path is to add to fill depth.
A 3rd pair LD and maybe a 3rd line forward should be what we want.
Keep both firsts.
No we desperately need goodrow out of the top 6. adding a scoring rw does nothing if goodrow is still there. We have kratsov who's "fine" in that spot, but gallant wont move goodrow out of there.Cause they desperately need a scoring RW
what would you rather have
A.)
Laffy Zibs Kakko
Panarin Chytil Tarasenko
Kreider Trocheck Kravtsov
or
B.)
Laffy Zibs Kakko
Panarin RO'R Chytil
Kreider Trocheck Kravtsov
Ryan Carpenter cleared waivers
Who are we trading for ROR or Tarasenko?what would you rather have
A.)
Laffy Zibs Kakko
Panarin Chytil Tarasenko
Kreider Trocheck Kravtsov
or
B.)
Laffy Zibs Kakko
Panarin RO'R Chytil
Kreider Trocheck Kravtsov
This is a low-key good thing
If Sammy Blais scores 29 points the rest of his career that would be somewhat of a surprise.It's disingenuous because you are purposely excluding things to make your point seem stronger.
If Goodrow can score 29 points at even strength, it isn't out of the realm of possibility that Blais could do it to. It won't be this year, but with another year of healing, maybe he can in the future.
A is a lot more likely, but B.what would you rather have
A.)
Laffy Zibs Kakko
Panarin Chytil Tarasenko
Kreider Trocheck Kravtsov
or
B.)
Laffy Zibs Kakko
Panarin RO'R Chytil
Kreider Trocheck Kravtsov
Blais to 29 points or Ovi to Gretzkys goal total?If Sammy Blais scores 29 points the rest of his career that would be somewhat of a surprise.
A is a lot more likely, but B.