pld459666
Registered User
Ask yourself this...why did Drury, in his role as National Team GM, take Fox to World Championships instead of D’Angelo?
Exposure to NHL talent
Ask yourself this...why did Drury, in his role as National Team GM, take Fox to World Championships instead of D’Angelo?
Can't wait for Traverse City and all the "Is ____ a bust?" posts.The theme of this offseason is that a topic is beaten to death to the point that I don’t care about the topic anymore as long as the discussion ends, move to the next topic and repeat. Traverse city can’t come soon enough
Ask yourself this...why did Drury, in his role as National Team GM, take Fox to World Championships instead of D’Angelo?
Can't wait for Traverse City and all the "Is ____ a bust?" posts.
But there will at least be some variety in the discussions as people claim different players are busts
Ask yourself this...why did Drury, in his role as National Team GM, take Fox to World Championships instead of D’Angelo?
That $2.6-$2.8M in space was what was simply left over from the previous moves, but my main point was that it's easily enough of a cushion to bring ADA in on a one-year deal. I also agree that it's definitely not enough for a multi-year deal, and, based on EvolvingWild's contract model, ADA is valued at 6 yrs $4.6M. While I would love to be able to ink him to that deal, I know that would cause some on here to have a strokeRe. ADA I don't think the Rangers need this $2.6-2.8 cap space. For a short bridge deal where ADA has practically no leverage this is too much. On the other hand, to sign him to a long term contract it's not enough.
Re. lineup - I'm not a gambler but I'd almost put my money on the organization penciling Chytil into 2C spot, not Strome.
That $2.6-$2.8M in space was what was simply left over from the previous moves, but my main point was that it's easily enough of a cushion to bring ADA in on a one-year deal. I also agree that it's definitely not enough for a multi-year deal, and, based on EvolvingWild's contract model, ADA is valued at 6 yrs $4.6M. While I would love to be able to ink him to that deal, I know that would cause some on here to have a stroke
I also agree about putting someone other than Strome at 2C, and that's what I'm expecting. The lineup I posted was a bit of me being lazy and just copying the lineup that was listed on CapFriendly.
Sign ada for his entry level deal and then in the middle of the year when we can extend players we sign ada if he is playing well to 3 years at 2.5m per?
You brought up the H wordThis is silliness. DeAngelo and Lemieux have little-to-no leverage unless through an offer sheet. Gorton has a price in mind and he knows that those two have little recourse except a holdout if they can't attract an offer from another team. If another team is bothering to do an offer sheet, they'll make it at a price that's fair for them as players, but more than what's traditionally given to your own RFAs without arbitration rights. It would have a lot more impact than saving Gorton the work of negotiation.
If ADA signs a 1-year deal now, he isn't signing long-term mid-season. He will go to arbitration in July 2020 then
He can only get 1 or 2 years in arbitration so why would that be better for him than a long term deal?
Where and for what though? The market has come to a screeching halt. There’s not many teams with cap space, and the ones that do have a RFA that's going to get a huge deal.
Do you want them moved for cents on a dollar return?
Other than Montreal, who has cap space right now, all those other examples are comparable to the current state of the league? All those teams at that time were in cap hell right?Did Armia or Lehkonen receive offer sheets? Did anyone on Calgary get offer sheeted after they sent one to ROR? Did anyone on PHI get offer sheeted after they sent one to Weber? Did anyone on SJ get offer sheeted after they sent one to Hjalmarsson?
That's the last 10 years of offer sheets. There has not been this retaliation even one time.
The last team to offer sheet a player and then have one of their players offer sheeted was Carolina. They sent one to Fedorov in 1998. Then Montreal sent on to Aho in 2019. I do not think these are related.
My sense is they are not done with Strome and Names. With Vesey, I think they saw enough and became convinced he wasn't going to improve here.Outside of kreider? Yes. Strome and or namestnikov should have been moved in the same fashion as jimmy Vesey a while ago.
Arbitration isn't always about getting a contract through the arbitrator. It's about leverage
It is about getting a contract, that leverage is to get a better contract
But if the rangers want to sign him long term they aren’t going to lowball him
A while ago, all Strome could get was Ryan Spooner. A while ago, Names was the asset of least value in a multi-player trade. They both finally have some worth to us, but we’re going to move them at a penalty and scramble for replacements because the league knows we’re in a corner? No thanks.Outside of kreider? Yes. Strome and or namestnikov should have been moved in the same fashion as jimmy Vesey a while ago.
Panarin and Trouba forced the Vesey move. There was a standing offer on the table. We took it because there was no other choice and the offers were going to get worse before they ever got better. Vesey will have a good season in Buffalo getting middle-six minutes.My sense is they are not done with Strome and Names. With Vesey, I think they saw enough and became convinced he wasn't going to improve here.
To flip this around, they are more confident in their wings than center depth. Down the middle, they want to keep some warm bodies around.Panarin and Trouba forced the Vesey move. There was a standing offer on the table. We took it because there was no other choice and the offers were going to get worse before they ever got better. Vesey will have a good season in Buffalo getting middle-six minutes.
Negotiating in July with an arbitration case pending makes more sense than negotiating mid-season