Speculation: Roster Building/Rumor Thread XVII

  • Xenforo Cloud will be upgrading us to version 2.3.5 on March 3rd at 12 AM GMT. This version has increased stability and fixes several bugs. We expect downtime for the duration of the update. The admin team will continue to work on existing issues, templates and upgrade all necessary available addons to minimize impact of this new version. Click Here for Updates
Status
Not open for further replies.
Again, I ask people to explain why they are so against trading Kakko for Eichel. Eichel is the more valuable player, scores more, plays the more important position. So what's the issue here? Because of Kakko's potential as a top 6 winger? How about Eichel's 100 point potential playing with Artemi?

Eichel also earns 10M per year and has a bad neck. If fully healthy, yeah, Kakko would be a fair price for Eichel.
 
Chytil, Kravtsov, Schneider, 1st is something I would do. Replace Schneider with Lundkvist and it'd give me pause.

Buch would have to be a substantial part of any deal for Eichel. I'm not giving up the value that would have to replace him in any deal.

If Buch can be flipped for a top 10 pick and then the top 10 pick packaged for Eichel, fine.
 
Again, I ask people to explain why they are so against trading Kakko for Eichel. Eichel is the more valuable player, scores more, plays the more important position. So what's the issue here? Because of Kakko's potential as a top 6 winger? How about Eichel's 100 point potential playing with Artemi?

Kakko may well be as valuable as a Rantanen/Tkachuk in 3-4 years. Eichel is a gamble (injury concerns) whose monstrous cap hit may not at all compare to his actual on ice production. Personally I think Eichel will never again be "100%" and will cycle in and out of the lineup with various issues. Not a gamble I pay anything for, much less a significant talent like Kakko.
 
Which is why you grow those types of players in-house, if you can, instead of having to buy them (like us). You spend your money on money players and develop the supporting players from within. As I said earlier, Tampa will just regrow their 3rd-line appendage that they just amputated.

Tampa traded a first round pick for Goodrow, and a prospect and a first round pick for Coleman. While they didn't give them big contracts they still paid a decent price to acquire "those types of players" in the first place

e: my point being honestly it's not simple to just "develop those players!"
The Rangers tried to do that with Howden, they hope they'll get something with Barron, but there's a difference between "cheap guy you can throw in the bottom six" and "really effective bottom six player who makes the whole team better" and the latter are actually decently tough to find sometimes
 
Again, I ask people to explain why they are so against trading Kakko for Eichel. Eichel is the more valuable player, scores more, plays the more important position. So what's the issue here? Because of Kakko's potential as a top 6 winger? How about Eichel's 100 point potential playing with Artemi?
While I think Kakko will be a superstar, what value does he have after two underwhelming seasons production wise? I hope (and believe) the Rangers sill value him highly, that doesn't mean the other organizations do. And even if they do value him, they can still point to the numbers and say that's not good enough.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad