RangersFan1994
Registered User
- Aug 20, 2019
- 19,214
- 15,870
for some reason I expect William Carrier to be a Ranger by the draft weekend is over. he played for Gallant and the type of players they need in the bottom 6
We’ll see how much Goodrow is overpaid when we’re retaining salary and adding picks to move the contract.So everyone loses their shit for overpaying Goodrow by 500k but wants to bridge Igor instead of locking him up and potentially saving 2-3M a year in cap space?
There's either going to be very little turnaround or huge turnaround of the roster with what Vince tweeted and what Servalli has said.
You mean turnover?
I think there is going to be pretty significant turnover as it is. Eichel, no Eichel, 3 eichels, people are going to move.
No, I wouldn't say that $5.5M is fine.$5-5.5M/5 yrs: fine
$6M/5 yrs: A BRIDGE TOO FAR.
???
Hard to envision a scenario where trading Buch and/or Strome makes the team better this upcoming season. I don't think the Rangers have better internal options and no one is acquiring those guys in exchange for better NHLers. It would be for futures. Do they trade those guys and then go out and acquire a guy like Eichel? That would be a blockbuster.
*pulls teeth out of my own head to continue the conversation*No, I wouldn't say that $5.5M is fine.
We’ll see how much Goodrow is overpaid when we’re retaining salary and adding picks to move the contract.
Only speaking for myself...I'd rather find a new goalie than commit $6M+ let alone the $8-9M+ you are suggesting he may cost down the road. Generally don't believe in committing that much cap to the position, barring a Vezina level season.
I'm pretty sure 2003 was worse.If these rumored deals come to pass, this is the beginning of some dark times
for some reason I expect William Carrier to be a Ranger by the draft weekend is over. he played for Gallant and the type of players they need in the bottom 6
If these rumored deals come to pass, this is the beginning of some dark times
Strome only goes out if someone else comes in I'm pretty sure AT LEAST until the TDL.
This would be the draft to do it though. I’d prefer we keep our first next season. That could be a deep 1st rd high end talent wiseI hate the idea of getting another pick just to add to the Eichel return. Just give a package and let them figure out their own picks. The guy needs neck surgery for gods sake
Some fans must take to doom and gloom path at all times.Please elaborate?
Legit curious how you have come to that conclusion
I'm pretty ambivalent-to-pro Eichel but yeah, it does look from the outside like the org is chasing those guys out and it's not great. I kind of hope it's for futures because late bloomer winger and flaky journeyman center who basically only scores points, both without term on the contract - are those the players people are going to trade top NHLers for?Hard to envision a scenario where trading Buch and/or Strome makes the team better this upcoming season. I don't think the Rangers have better internal options and no one is acquiring those guys in exchange for better NHLers. It would be for futures. Do they trade those guys and then go out and acquire a guy like Eichel? That would be a blockbuster.
4.75 - 5.25*pulls teeth out of my own head to continue the conversation*
What would yo-
*yanks a molar out and rams it up my nose*
-u think is a good figure then?
could be trolling?