Is anyone bothered by the fact that Hank isn't even on his new contract yet and people jump on him for making 8.5 mill a year every time he does anything that isn't absolutely perfect?
A. Letting in 2 goals a game is good by the standards of any goalie.
B. Hank isn't on his new contract yet
C. The Canes have a good goalie who is cheap due to his relatively underwhelming history. Good for them. The Rangers had Hank on sweet deals for the past decade almost. Players grow up and eventually get paid if they've been playing over their pay grade for years and years and years.
It's worse that he's not on it yet and in my opinion, is even more relevant in poor performances.
1) You're right, but how many times this year have we expected Hank to make "that" save during the game and he hasn't. Not to mention, back to back games, back to back penalty shots and he really was beaten cleanly on both. He used to be "the king" at breakaways, this year he looks like a "joker."
B) Yea, and he's not earning that extension this year, that's for sure. Still happy we gave it to him, but I understand angry fans.
C) When have the Rangers EVER had Hank on a sweet deal, outside of his first 2 years in the league? The last "decade" or if you look at his last "6" years, he has been the highest paid goalie nearly every season. When he was FINALLY paid more this year, he gets an extension to out do that.
Again, I love the guy, am happy with the extension, but for God's sake, he has not been on any ****ing discount almost EVER. He has been the king and paid as such almost since he stepped on our ice.