Clowes Line
Cally's Chicken Parm
Tim Panaccio @tpanotchCSN
those asking, Bill Daly confirmed you CANT use the compliance buyouts on players who have LTIR status, such as Chris Pronger.
Lol Flyers.
Tim Panaccio @tpanotchCSN
those asking, Bill Daly confirmed you CANT use the compliance buyouts on players who have LTIR status, such as Chris Pronger.
7 divisional games is ridiculous. Would screw the powerhouses (Atlantic, Central) and let even more terrible teams (SE) into the playoffs.
My idea is 46 games:
4 divisional = 16
2 conference = 20
1 against 10 from the west = 10
If we do have 7 divisional games, the Flyers games could be HUGE!
If we stay perfect against them, we should be fine, and could even knock them out of a playoff spot
If we do have 7 divisional games, the Flyers games could be HUGE!
If we stay perfect against them, we should be fine, and could even knock them out of a playoff spot
You do realize the Flyers will likely win a game against us at some point, right?
7 divisional games is ridiculous. Would screw the powerhouses (Atlantic, Central) and let even more terrible teams (SE) into the playoffs.
My idea is 46 games:
4 divisional = 16
2 conference = 20
1 against 10 from the west = 10
You do realize the Flyers will likely win a game against us at some point, right?
With the compressed schedule, traveling to opposite coasts is unrealistic.
This season is going to be about avoiding a "slow start"... and as usual, getting hot at the right time (game 51). Applies to everyone, not just the Rangers. If you're not playing decent hockey 50+ games into the season, well, probably not gonna change much by game 65-70. I can deal with .500 hockey for 50 games, as long as
1. It gets us into the playoffs..
2. We get hot around game 50
Funny, feels like a million years ago to me!It feels like yesterday when everyone was waiting for Columbus to stop asking for too much for Nash and the party that ensued when we got him for that package. Wait until that happens at the deadline if the team wants to get someone big as a final piece like Iginla. This whole lockout killed those vibes of Nash. Now, we're a week away from seeing him in live action.
So, is the $64.3M cap enough to keep Gaby for next year?
Like others have said it should be, I do think however that he's the odd man out in the end.
I think Richards is safe barring a collapse do to his relationship with Torts.
I think Nash is safe considering we gave up assets to get him. Unless he's a complete dud which I don't think will happen.
If Richards and Nash really mesh and Kreider develops into a legit offensive threat then Gabby is as good as gone IMHO.
Any word if NHL Center Ice will be free like they said a few weeks ago?
would you rather see Gabbys 40 goals or Staal moved for a big package? I rather keep both but the cap is going to be tight.
I really do want Gabby and Nash for 2 full yrs and cup runs
would you rather see Gabbys 40 goals or Staal moved for a big package? I rather keep both but the cap is going to be tight.
I really do want Gabby and Nash for 2 full yrs and cup runs
Neither of Gaborik or Staal are being traded this summer. The entire team will fit for 13/14 with the 64.3M cap. And if they need a million or two it won't be either of these guys who are dealt.
Trade Lundqvist.
Neither of Gaborik or Staal are being traded this summer. The entire team will fit for 13/14 with the 64.3M cap. And if they need a million or two it won't be either of these guys who are dealt.
Trade Lundqvist.