Yakupov64
Registered User
- Dec 25, 2017
- 148
- 31
Nyquist will ge traded for a low first + 2rd if they sell at the right team, and Howard for low first
I cant tell if you were trying to say 2nd, 3rd, or turd.
Nyquist will ge traded for a low first + 2rd if they sell at the right team, and Howard for low first
I'm fine with Jimmy coming back next year. However I am not fine with not getting anything for him. 1st, 2nd, 3rd or even a prospect. Not getting anything is silly, as Jimmy isn't going to help us reach the playoffs this year anyway, and we can suck it up with Bernier and our AHL goalies the rest of the way. Same goes for Nyquist, although I prefer we trade him, and don't bring him back. I have a feeling he will be the 40 pt player he has been the past 2 seasons, and this year is an outlier, because he is playing for his first UFA deal. Even on a good deal, I am not that excited about him being back, as we know what he brings, and it doesn't help us win, so him getting older, doesn't seem like a good recipe to fix that.
Should have never made the ask public especially with the notion that teams are prob not going to pay itI think there can be value in not settling, especially if the only offer we get is a late 3rd. Look, if you let it out that you want a 1st for a certain asset and settle for a late 3rd every time teams aren’t going to take your ask very seriously in future negotiations. If other teams know you’re willing to settle for a significantly less than your expected value it will that much harder to get your value next time. Sometimes you have to dig in and say no, this is the value I need.
Now, this is a balancing act as we are rebuilding and need more picks. It doesn’t need to be the approach 100% of the time but you have to be willing to stick to your guns sometimes.
I could settle for a 2nd + with one of them but the question is who? Nyquist seems like the better bet to actually return a 1st but seems unlikely to accept a short term contract. If you dig in on your ask there is risk you get nothing and he walks. With Howard, it seems more unlikely that a 1st is offered but he is less likely to walk as a UFA; we could probably bring him back on a 1 or 2 year contract at 4 mill/per (or whatever) and flip him a year or two from now.
Maybe. I'd say that's tangent to my point though. We are where we are, ya know.Should have never made the ask public especially with the notion that teams are prob not going to pay it
On Gustav Nyquist...
For a while there it looked like the Wings may bring him back, but now I am hearing the Capitals have essentially targeted Nyquist....
He’s better than what you have in CalgaryWants a first for Howard... and I want to go on a date with Kate Upton
and I'm thinner than a 600 pound guy, doesn't make me a supermodel.He’s better than what you have in Calgary
E3 baby:
I would love to get Nyqvist on the Capitals. Plays well every time I watch the Wings. Not sure they could afford him.
Bruins desperately looking for a RWer. I wonder if the Redwings would take Zboril for him to put on their LHD. Former 1st Rounder ready for the NHL.
He's better then what you've in Calgary now, But then again if you want a 1st round exit that's fine by us.Wants a first for Howard... and I want to go on a date with Kate Upton
This.Nyquist absolutely deserves a first, Howard a 2nd or a third and a prospect.
Why would we make this deal? Just to get into the playoffs? Or do you think we end up re-signing 1 or 2 of these guys?
He's better then what you've in Calgary now, But then again if you want a 1st round exit that's fine by us.
A first of Howard is more realistic, Then you going on a date with Kate Upton. Seeing that she's married to Justin Verlander.Wants a first for Howard... and I want to go on a date with Kate Upton