I wonder if he really didn't know. [hee i kind of like the 'that's too bad" like oops, well what more do you want
]
What I'm not understanding - why if someone goes "Reimer sucks" it's "oh my god, it's not fair." [note - I'm not saying he sucks, please and thank you] or anything that even remotely touches on the "he's not handling competition or the pressure well," so he should be moved for someone who
can be a backup/Bernier push-er who can handle competition and the pressure well and there is all this "but Reimer did this! and Remier did that! and we're being unfair!!
and then there is comment after comment after comment after comment about how
brutal Clarkson is. the collective no one is giving him any credit, no one brings up his two really good offensive years + his years of just playing really good hockey in NJD, or even hey - he can have a bounce back year. Nope. it's all about how much he is the place where offense goes to die, and his contract sucks, and he needs to go.
So. why... exactly is Reimer exempt [or should be exempt] from the exact same thing? Because we drafted him? Because he
played well? Because let's call a spade a spade - 4 wins out of 17 is brutal. You can slap the lipstick on that pig of a stat any way you want and give very reasonable reasons, but it ain't good. Especially when you flip it and go Bernier's last 18, Bernier's only lost 2 in regulation [and 3 overtime losses, and 1 of those was coming into relief of Reimer].
that's just my ponder. At any rate, regardless of what happens, I hope he goes somewhere where he can be a #1 goaltender, work on his game some more, and do well, and I hope we can get some pieces to make his team better. at the end of the day I don't really care what they do as long as
are better.