Sidney the Kidney
One last time
- Jun 29, 2009
- 56,857
- 49,479
What are the odds the 12 year old isn't the only victim? People like Boucher don't do the kind of heinous things he did and only do it one time in their life.
But 10 years later the other side all of a sudden changed their minds and blamed him in raping.
In those 10 years, the world has changed. Men who did this sort of thing weren't usually held accountable for their actions. Now, more and more often, they are. In the old days, it may not have felt worthwhile to press charges, because the case wasn't likely to go anywhere. That's why all of these women are seeking justice now -- because now they can actually get it.
At least there's no denying what happened. The facts are in no way in dispute. He should see serious jail time, and that's the best outcome here.
Man, vikings used to do terrible things to people: murder, rape, slave them. Let's sue Scandinavians now, all those Swedes, Danes, Norwegians. I mean, world has changed since then you know...
Raping was always raping, men were jailed for it 100 years ago, 50 years ago, 10 years ago. Ask Mike Tyson about this. If they didn't consider it raping back to then, why do they sue Boucher at all now? If it was rape, why didn't they sue him back to then?
Things like an effort to reduce victim blaming, and more outlets to speak in a way that your reports aren't minimized are much more relevant...
Also in some cases, it can take therapy /time to get over blaming yourself and work up the ability to speak up and tear open the old wound.
But 10 years later the other side all of a sudden changed their minds and blamed him in raping.?
The victim was 12 at the time. What, you expect a 12 year old to sue Boucher?
That responsibility falls on her parents; which for some reason they didn’t do. Neglectful parents if you ask me. Horrible.
But the victim is an adult now, hence why the lawsuit is coming years after the fact.
Yeah, it's just weird it always happens to more or less famous people. Nobody sues random homeless dudes...
Man, vikings used to do terrible things to people: murder, rape, slave them. Let's sue Scandinavians now, all those Swedes, Danes, Norwegians. I mean, world has changed since then you know...
Raping was always raping, men were jailed for it 100 years ago, 50 years ago, 10 years ago. Ask Mike Tyson about this. If they didn't consider it raping back to then, why do they sue Boucher at all now? If it was rape, why didn't they sue him back to then?
What are the odds the 12 year old isn't the only victim? People like Boucher don't do the kind of heinous things he did and only do it one time in their life.
Women are still getting a free pass for this behavior and other nehaviorarsIn those 10 years, the world has changed. Men who did this sort of thing weren't usually held accountable for their actions. Now, more and more often, they are. In the old days, it may not have felt worthwhile to press charges, because the case wasn't likely to go anywhere. That's why all of these women are seeking justice now -- because now they can actually get it.
At least there's no denying what happened. The facts are in no way in dispute. He should see serious jail time, and that's the best outcome here.
So Lamoriello's okay with sexually assaulting women and children, so long as you're freshly shaved and suited up. At least he's got his priorities straight...
And yet women continue Yo get a free pass for predatory behaviorsFor every sexual assault case that goes to court, I believe the vast majority are never reported at all, and most of the ones that are, are either dropped or not prosecuted. The guy was nearly 18, and raped a 12 year old girl. He's probably done this more than one time, probably several times.
Boucher should have been registered as a sex offender at the very least. It's unreal that he is getting away with this crime with a slap on the wrist.
Women are still getting a free pass for this behavior and other nehaviorars
And yet women continue Yo get a free pass for predatory behaviors
For every sexual assault case that goes to court, I believe the vast majority are never reported at all, and most of the ones that are, are either dropped or not prosecuted. The guy was nearly 18, and raped a 12 year old girl. He's probably done this more than one time, probably several times.
Boucher should have been registered as a sex offender at the very least. It's unreal that he is getting away with this crime with a slap on the wrist.
There are numerous cases that set a precedent of women being punished less than men for underage sexual assault, it’s kind of disgusting actually.What the **** are you even talking about.
What does that have to do with this case???There are numerous cases that set a precedent of women being punished less than men for underage sexual assault, it’s kind of disgusting actually.
As far as I understand both sides knew about the case since the begining, and nobody did anyhing. Boucher didn't run away and hide, the girl's parents didn't go to police and started the investigation. I mean Boucher even played at WJC despite Hockey USA knew about the story. But 10 years later the other side all of a sudden changed their minds and blamed him in raping. So why are people that much surprised that court did basically nothing to Boucher and the KHL hasn't thrown him away?
The only reason I can see the parents not going to the police is if they thought it was consensual. In that case, it’s just “get him out of the house”, because it’s not against the law for sex to occur between two people of that age. And seeing she was 12, I’m sure it woulda been hard enough to tell them it happened at all, let alone all of the circumstances that went with it. I know when I was 12 I didn’t even like telling my parents we were taking Sex Ed in school. I definitely wouldn’t be able to tell them I had sex, forced or not.
There are numerous cases that set a precedent of women being punished less than men for underage sexual assault, it’s kind of disgusting actually.
Also have to take into account the girl would be forced to take the stand and testify, have to relive the ordeal in a case that would pretty much be her word vs his and a guilty verdict isn't a slam dunk