Toggle sidebar

RD Tristan Luneau - Gatineau Olympiques, QMJHL (2022, 53rd, ANA)

heusy_79 said:
No I'm definitely not wrong. They will be in the AHL because they are clearly are ready for it, but both are in their age 19 season and eligible for junior again next year as OAs.

He's referring to them as though they are OAs already.
Click to expand...
Gotcha, I guess I was missing the context.

But you’re going off a technicality, when kids are as talented as they are, with ELC’s alreafy signed - They won’t be returning to the CHL as overagers. it has never happened before.
 
  • Like
Reactions: WhatTheDuck
Dirtyf1ghter said:
The number of U21 players is limited to 3 per team. They are second rate players. U21 players drafted by an NHL franchise are usually assigned to a senior team.
Click to expand...

Well aware of that thanks. You referred to them as 20 year olds in their final season of junior.

Mintyukov and Zellweger are both 19 and playing out their age 19 season. Luneau is in his age 18 season and just turned 19 in the new year.

Just pointing out that it was yet another terrible argument on your part.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ohcomeonref and Vipers31
heusy_79 said:
No I'm definitely not wrong. They will be in the AHL because they are clearly are ready for it, but both are in their age 19 season and eligible for junior again next year as OAs.

He's referring to them as though they are OAs already.
Click to expand...

Limited to 3 per team. Players who have not signed a contract with an NHL franchise. Mintyukov and Zellweger can't play in CHL next year.
 
GermanSpitfire said:
Gotcha, I guess I was missing the context.

But both most definitely won’t be back as O/A’s.
Click to expand...

I'm not even sure how long we will be keeping Mintyukov down in the AHL next year. They'll let him decide with his play, but I don't know that it will be long before he shows he's ready for the best league in the world. He's a stud
 
heusy_79 said:
Well aware of that thanks. You referred to them as 20 year olds in their final season of junior.

Mintyukov and Zellweger are both 19 and playing out their age 19 season. Luneau is in his age 18 season and just turned 19 in the new year.

Just pointing out that it was yet another terrible argument on your part.
Click to expand...
Zellweger and Mintyukov will be 20 in a few months and have played against players who may be 16-17 years old born in 2005-2006... They even played against guys who were born in 2007 when they were born in 2003. It doesn't change anything basically.
 
Dirtyf1ghter said:
Youtube is full of matches in full dude.
Click to expand...
im sure everyone here will admit your boy Hutson had a GREAT season this year... anyone that doesnt admit that is wrong. Just unsure why you are so vocal about those Ducks prospects not being overly impressive. Its very bizzare to see.

Its ok to admit other teams prospects are impressive.

You may be the only person in the hockey world that is dead set against some of these players
 
  • Like
Reactions: Eegs
Dirtyf1ghter said:
Limited to 3 per team. Players who have not signed a contract with an NHL franchise.
Click to expand...

You referred to a group of prospects as 20 year olds playing their final year of junior. That would imply being an overage. None of them are 20 and all of them are eligible for at least one more year of junior. I'm well aware of how the overage rules work.

You were clearly reaching to try and make your stupid point (one that wasn't relevant here to begin with) and posted flat out false info.

Dirtyf1ghter said:
Zellweger and Mintyukov will be 20 in a few months and have played against players who may be 16-17 years old born in 2005-2006... They even played against guys who were born in 2007 when they were born in 2003. It doesn't change anything basically.
Click to expand...

So they are not 20 now, nor will they be at any point this season. Luneau won't be for another year. So you were reaching to try and make your stupid point, let's call it what it was.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Vipers31
Skinnyjimmy08 said:
im sure everyone here will admit your boy Hutson had a GREAT season this year... anyone that doesnt admit that is wrong. Just unsure why you are so vocal about those Ducks prospects not being overly impressive. Its very bizzare to see.

Its ok to admit other teams prospects are impressive.

You may be the only person in the hockey world that is dead set against some of these players
Click to expand...
You say I've never seen Hutson play, except on Youtube. I am replying to you. Accept it.

heusy_79 said:
You referred to a group of prospects as 20 year olds playing their final year of junior. That would imply being an overage. None of them are 20 and all of them are eligible for at least one more year of junior. I'm well aware of how the overage rules work.

You were clearly reaching to try and make your stupid point (one that wasn't relevant here to begin with) and posted flat out false info.



So they are not 20 now, nor will they be at any point this season. Luneau won't be for another year. So you were reaching to try and make your stupid point, let's call it what it was.
Click to expand...
Ok so if I say that they are 19 year old players who dominate in a junior league where the vast majority of players are between 15 and 18 years old, what does that change as a reasoning ?
 
Dirtyf1ghter said:
You say I've never seen Hutson play, except on Youtube. I am replying to you. Accept it.


Ok so if I say that it is 19 year old players who dominate in a junior league where the vast majority of players are between 15 and 18 years old, what does that change as a reasoning ?
Click to expand...

Well at least at that point you aren't lying to try and make your point. I still don't think anyone here would deem anything you've said in this thread to be necessary, informative or remotely insightful.
 
heusy_79 said:
Well at least at that point you aren't lying to try and make your point. I still don't think anyone here would deem anything you've said in this thread to be necessary, informative or remotely insightful.
Click to expand...
You knew very well what I meant by 20 years. U20. They are.
 
heusy_79 said:
What do you think the U stands for?
Click to expand...
Do not insist. Players born in 2003 are not eligible for the next Junior World Championship and players signed by an NHL franchise are in their final CHL year.

Your zeal is ridiculous because Zellweger and Mintyukov turn 20 in a few months. So they are U20 in a league with U16 to U19 players.

Zegs2sendhelp said:
you said he’d never be top 10 in a redraft, quick google top one had him 11
Click to expand...

Well that's the case, isn't it? If I thought he wasn't worth top 15, I would have said top 15.
 
Last edited:
Dirtyf1ghter said:
Do not insist. Players born in 2003 are not eligible for the next Junior World Championship and players signed by an NHL franchise are in their final CHL year.

Your zeal is ridiculous because Zellweger and Mintyukov turn 20 in a few months.
Click to expand...

They turn 20 next season. They just turned 19 this season. Stick to speaking in facts instead of reaching.

Anyway, it wasn't just this one point. Your entire argument in this thread has been completely pointless. You can go on about your little pet prospect and why you think he's better than everyone on your own board. No one cares here.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ohcomeonref, Vipers31 and Zegs2sendhelp
Dirtyf1ghter said:
Do not insist. Players born in 2003 are not eligible for the next Junior World Championship and players signed by an NHL franchise are in their final CHL year.

Your zeal is ridiculous because Zellweger and Mintyukov turn 20 in a few months.



Well that's the case, isn't it? If I thought he wasn't worth top 15, I would have said top 15.
Click to expand...
Hey look everyone he’s moving goal posts again
 
  • Like
Reactions: Vipers31
Dirtyf1ghter said:
You say I've never seen Hutson play, except on Youtube. I am replying to you. Accept it.


Ok so if I say that they are 19 year old players who dominate in a junior league where the vast majority of players are between 15 and 18 years old, what does that change as a reasoning ?
Click to expand...
relax man.. i meant youtube clips

anyways, you are looking extremely foolish in this thread so i suggest you just stop
 
You guys gotta stop feeding the troll. I don't even think I've seen him on the Habs board before. If anything a bunch of us over there are jealous we didn't pick up Luneau and have been talking about how great a year he's had.

Both teams have great D pools. Anaheim probably has slightly better high end, Habs more depth. Neither group has proven much of anything yet.

Luneau looks like a good one though. Glad he seems to broke out of that 'vanilla' description placed on him last season.
 
  • Like
Reactions: lwvs84, slumpy43, Vinegar Strokes and 6 others
JT3 said:
You guys gotta stop feeding the troll. I don't even think I've seen him on the Habs board before. If anything a bunch of us over there are jealous we didn't pick up Luneau and have been talking about how great a year he's had.

Both teams have great D pools. Anaheim probably has slightly better high end, Habs more depth. Neither group has proven much of anything yet.

Luneau looks like a good one though. Glad he seems to broke out of that 'vanilla' description placed on him last season.
Click to expand...
agreed!!!.. its crazy how one delusional person on here can derail a thread and put a sour taste in peoples mouths towards a fanbase
 
  • Like
  • Wow
Reactions: JT3 and Dirtyf1ghter
The guys who harass a user because he think Anaheim doesn't have the best young defense in the NHL and can't stand that person not giving in to their bullying process...

The worst part is that as a French speaker, I probably have a lot more love for this player than I have for years and will follow his entire career. Whereas when he is no longer in Anaheim, you will have forgotten him.

Big love for Luneau.

Very good season this year - profile of a top 4 in the making. I hope for more.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Top Bottom