LeafChief
Matthew Knies Enthusiast
I am sorry for thinking there are better players out there than him. He'll be the 4th D on that team behind brannstrom, dahlin and boqvist
Nice! Congrats big guy!
I am sorry for thinking there are better players out there than him. He'll be the 4th D on that team behind brannstrom, dahlin and boqvist
I am sorry for thinking there are better players out there than him. He'll be the 4th D on that team behind brannstrom, dahlin and boqvist
16 year old seasons:
Dahlin [SHL] - 26 GP, 1G, 2A, 3P
Liljegren [SHL] - 19 GP, 1G, 4A, 5P
Dahlin [SuperElit] - 24GP, 9G, 13A, 22P
Liljegren [SuperElit] - 29GP, 7G, 15A, 22P
17 year old seasons:
Liljegren (17) [SHL] - 19GP, 1G, 4A, 5P
Hedman (17) [SHL] - 39GP, 2G, 2A, 4P
Karlsson (17) [SHL] -7GP, 1G, 0A, 1P
Karlsson (17) [SuperElit] - 38GP, 13G, 24A, 37P
OEL (17) [Allsvenskan] - 39GP, 3G, 14A, 17P
Dahlin (17) - ?
(If you don't know, the best is SHL, then Allsvenskan, then SuperElit)
Just like everyone, i predict that Dahlin *will* be better, but there's no real definitive proof that says "Dahlin is ahead of Liljegren" TODAY. You can only base it on projection and eye test, which is obviously just as flawed as looking at pre-NHL stats.
Certainly a chance of him moving from 3 to 4 when Boqvist hits the scene
Brannstrom could've fell 2 spots.
If were talking chances, there's a chance he doesn't even make the team.
There's a chance Trump nukes North Korea.
There's a chance it rains tomorrow.
Theres also a chance that Liljegren never plays in the NHL. Theres a chance that this past year wasnt a fluke and that he actually lacks high hockey IQ - a big chance that is.
The funniest leaf fans are those that think that Liljegren's better than Dahlin. Boqvist aint that far behind Dahlin in terms of ceiling, and hes already a waaaaay smarter player than Liljegren.
The funniest leaf fans are those that think that Liljegren's better than Dahlin.
Theres also a chance that Liljegren never plays in the NHL. Theres a chance that this past year wasnt a fluke and that he actually lacks high hockey IQ - a big chance that is.
The funniest leaf fans are those that think that Liljegren's better than Dahlin. Boqvist aint that far behind Dahlin in terms of ceiling, and hes already a waaaaay smarter player than Liljegren.
Is it just me or is this mainly an HF narrative pushed by select users?
Can anyone point to more than one scout saying there are big concerns around his hockey IQ or that its very low or something?
All I've heard/seen from actual scouting reports is something along the lines of "questionable decision making at times" which to me doesn't sound like the hockey-mentally challenged bust some people want to paint Liljegren as. Not to mention I think I only saw 1 glaring mistake from him in the 3 games of WJSS play I could watch.
Sure there is a chance. Just like there is a chance that Cale Makar is a mediocre talent who looked better than he did playing in a league full of scrubs and duds.
Agree about the over the top hype though its equally entertaining when Avs fans talk about Makar being the next Keith. I have never seen anything from him that says he has close to the same upside but fans gonna hype.
I'd love to see some proof of this.
So you're going to paint the entire fanbase with one person's opinion? You said Avs Fans.
Go read the Makar thread on the Avs sub-forum to get a realistic opinion on what we think of him.
Sure there is a chance. Just like there is a chance that Cale Makar is a mediocre talent who looked better than he did playing in a league full of scrubs and duds.
Agree about the over the top hype though its equally entertaining when Avs fans talk about Makar being the next Keith. I have never seen anything from him that says he has close to the same upside but fans gonna hype.
Im confused...
Where exactly does Cobra say Makar is the next Keith? It's a stylistic comparison. The post even says how its unfair to compare Makar to the best dman of this generation. Seems as though Avs fans are the ones with realistic expectations for their prospects.
At the same age Makar is ahead of Keith that's why he was picked in the top 5. It's not insane to think he looks better than Kieth at 17/18.
I don't know why you're insistent on stirring up a pot that frankly doesn't even exist.
At 18 Keith already had a quality full NCAA year under his belt.
At 17 Keith had as good a year in the BCHL as Makar did in the AJHL at age 18.
Makar is clearly behind Keith at the same point.
So you're going to paint the entire fanbase with one person's opinion? You said Avs Fans.
Go read the Makar thread on the Avs sub-forum to get a realistic opinion on what we think of him.
It's a stylistic comparison.
At the same age Makar is ahead of Keith that's why he was picked in the top 5. It's not insane to think he looks better than Kieth at 17/18.