RD Mitchell Miller - Tri-City Storm, USHL (2020, 111th, ARI, rights renounced)

  • Xenforo Cloud has upgraded us to version 2.3.6. Please report any issues you experience.
  • We are currently aware of "log in/security error" issues that are affecting some users. We apologize and ask for your patience as we try to get these issues fixed.
That tends to happen when one kid calls the other kid the n-word and brownie.
Thanks for pointing that out. I re-read the article.
Having been targeted many times, some less articulate kids would use the most base insults based on:
Race, Religion, Orientstion, etc.) I was called token W......., F.., etc.

The question is:
- is he fully indoctrinated
- Has he grown out of it.

As for anti human rights ( Canada) and constitution rights (US) behaviour.
All anyone has to ask themselves is:
Have you called a person a Clown, a joke, an idiot, a moron, etc.
It is just as awful.

I believe in the protection under human rights based on Race, Religion, age, disability, etc.
But there is a need for human rights built into charter (Canada) and US for other vulnerable people
children
And
Victim of Crime rights are important.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Yozhik v tumane
Wonder if UND and/or Arizona now admit that Miller lied to them about apologizing to the kid and his family - now that the mother clearly states that he never did. And that fact that he was "so remorseful" that he kept terrorizing the kid for a few more years....
 
Welp, this kid's NHL career just got totally iced by the mom's article today.
Release his rights, save face, move on.
 
Many here now know I am the author of 50+ hockey theories,
Like high danger shot area ( homeplate), Open/closed shot, and the only pro sport roster proof ( thanks Vegas).

Didn't realize posting on a message board made you an expert.

I also posted a highly respected theory, it's called "why your theory is bull"
 
  • Like
Reactions: Terry Yake
A better education would've prevented this whole mess. Well, that, and giving more importance to the concept of personnal responsibility.
 
The Athletic reporting that the Coyotes interviewed him pre-covid and took him off their list due to "inconsistencies" in his story. After Chayka left and the resulting shakeup, he was obviously put back on the list. Buffalo had him as DND so it looks like it didn't come from Jankowski. Unless the Coyotes lack of draft choices changed his risk assessment.
 
Here is my problem with "I did stupid things when I was that age"

Did you know right from wrong, yes or no? If you did things out of ignorance like using certain types of language then ok I can accept that

But if you know something is wrong and you do it anyways that is completely different and every 14 year old knows white people should not use that word. And bullying handicapped people is just flatout cruel and you hope he eventually realizes the error of his ways

Then as the team you have to ask whether you want him representing your organization and if he's worth the headache.

Evidently Arizona thinks so
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dux917 and Torgo
Wonder if UND and/or Arizona now admit that Miller lied to them about apologizing to the kid and his family - now that the mother clearly states that he never did. And that fact that he was "so remorseful" that he kept terrorizing the kid for a few more years....
The apology apparently was a written letter from what I have read. So, even 4 years ago, it should have been sent courier rather than postage to ensure that they had proof it was delivered. Miller's side says he apologized, via the letter, the victim's side say he didn't because they didn't get a letter. From what I gather.

But, honestly, why is a letter involved? Shouldn't they have had Miller look the other kid in the face when he is saying sorry, not just to the kid but to the parents as well. And the parents of Miller should be apologizing to the other kid's parents.
 
Didn't realize posting on a message board made you an expert.

I also posted a highly respected theory, it's called "why your theory is bull"

Which theory:
The theories that are the basis for all goal differential analysis.
Homeplate and open closed shot. (Closed shot hits a wall ( the Goalie)
These theories look at the 3D x,y realease location and y,z Arrival at net location. The basis for all correct goal diff analysis.
It allows us to identify elite off forwards.
Elite high danger open shot reduction dmen.
Elite open shot (only scoreable) save% goalies.

My champion ship roster core theory based 26 yrs of relatable final 4 team structures.
What is now a proof. Thanks to VGK selecting 100% players in in expansion that fit my roster theory.
Making the cup final. Which I stated they would pre exp on HFB.

Is it the look at the multitude of papers on foodsvaffect on Cancer Cocktails. Identifying the need to do a concentration look at portions of food structure. Building a meal structure based on exclusion of foods negative to my cancer cocktail based on the FDA’s new tracking of bio structure of all foods entering NA.
The belief that a 2 yr process Is required to reduce M protein count from 90% infiltration to a M count of 4-5/that qualifies A person for stem cell transplant.
My approach resulting in a 2 month to qualify with this dietary approach.

Is it my look at all the papers on male/ female differentiation in human anatomy structures during fetal development.
Even a simple look at major portions of brain and cortex pathways takes us to 1.19 trillion Possible combinations. No individual is bio evolutionary built the same.
The desire to get to a point were I will be able to tell children (my motivation as a parent) the combinations of biology that makes them who they are. I have listed this on other blogs.

Which do you speak of.
 
Last edited:
If the person he is now is different than the person he was before. Give him a chance at atonement, make amends and give him his life back.
his life hasn't been "taken" in any way at this point lmao...people are so pearl clutchy, acting like internet criticism has stripped him of his liberty, when in reality he's still got a full ride scholarship and is drafted by an NHL team.
 
Blitz Krug:
It is not surprising the current hockey community that uses my first half of goal diff theory rejects open/closed shot theory.
It makes all current goal based analysis highly inaccurate.
The theory is based on a Goalie moving like a wall blocking shots (Ph1 of tracking) (Table hockey Goalie movement).
The only +ve jump in save% based on goalie movement.
( JVB & ROY)
Pucks hit the wall that is a goalie having 0% of going in.
Current analytics Understands the shot density potential based on x,y location.
But rejects the closed shot (0% density) exclusion.

I always say:
As a coach:
- Start a Scrimmage gm.
- Take one net cover it Completely with plywood.
- leave one net completely open.
- tell the kids both teams have an equal chance of scoring goals (Hockey analytics current belief) in front of the parents.
- Let the fireworks begin!
 
Last edited:
his life hasn't been "taken" in any way at this point lmao...people are so pearl clutchy, acting like internet criticism has stripped him of his liberty, when in reality he's still got a full ride scholarship and is drafted by an NHL team.
Then we should allow him to make amends.
 
Blitz Krug:
It is not surprising the current hockey community that uses my first half of goal diff theory rejects open/closed shot theory.
It makes all current goal based analysis highly inaccurate.
The theory is based on a Goalie moving like a wall blocking shots (Ph1 of tracking) (Table hockey Goalie movement).
The only +ve jump in save% based on goalie movement.
( JVB & ROY)
Pucks hit the wall that is a goalie having 0% of going in.
Current analytics Understands the shot density potential based on x,y location.
But rejects the closed shot (0% density) exclusion.

I always say:
As a coach:
- Start a Scrimmage gm.
- Take one net cover it Completely with plywood.
- leave one net completely open.
- tell the kids both teams have an equal chance of scoring goals (Hockey analytics current belief) in front of the parents.
- Let the fireworks begin!
Man, hockey's never seemed less fun
 
The Athletic reporting that the Coyotes interviewed him pre-covid and took him off their list due to "inconsistencies" in his story. After Chayka left and the resulting shakeup, he was obviously put back on the list. Buffalo had him as DND so it looks like it didn't come from Jankowski. Unless the Coyotes lack of draft choices changed his risk assessment.

I don't see how anyone but Jankowski could've been responsible since neither Plandowski nor Armstrong were allowed to participate in the draft. That leaves ownership, and why would they care about a 4th round pick? Something doesn't make sense here.
 
ElXaMkAWMAEFDj6
He was still doing the same BS two years later at 16?

Makes me happy the Sens drafted Kleven instead of this POS.
 
  • Like
Reactions: branch
So for those wondering about Miller's parents... I've removed his name and do not encourage doxxing, harassment, or threats, but make of this what you will from his father's public Facebook wall. Note the date in particular:

SKhDO9y.png
 
  • Like
Reactions: GoJackets1
So for those wondering about Miller's parents... I've removed his name and do not encourage doxxing, harassment, or threats, but make of this what you will from his father's public Facebook wall. Note the date in particular:

SKhDO9y.png
Are we going to fight the culture war on hfboards? Really?

You can also find an article about the victim's father assaulting a coach for not giving another of his kids enough playing time if you go digging (make of it what you will?). Let's not try people in the court of public opinion, it just isn't a good place for society to go. As a 14 yr old he was dealt with in the courts. If he slips up again (significantly and with evidence, not just the hearsay of the victim's family that might be biased), then by all means, write him off. Otherwise this is just an ugly mob operating in an ugly time.

People can change, look up Christian Picciolini if you want an example.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Name Nameless
He's had 4 years and hasn't, including taunting him as little as 2 years ago...and here you are acting like no one has ever given him a chance and spinning him as the "victim" whose had his life taken away when that is demonstrably false.
Define what this "taunting" was please. Are you referring to him rollerblading past the house or something more?
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Name Nameless

Ad

Ad