Preposterone
Registered User
- Dec 6, 2013
- 843
- 1,011
I heard lassinantti’s name called on saves, so SHLis that SHL preseason or J20?
I heard lassinantti’s name called on saves, so SHLis that SHL preseason or J20?
No shit.Kid seems like he should have been taken higher being able to play top minutes and score the way he does in the SHL which normally doesn't hand out that kind of playing time/responsibility to younger players.
Yeah...I almost thought at one point that Detroit might have gotten away with drafting ASP first and then getting Danielson with the 17th, but because of the way the D were being taken early on, it seemed like they felt comfortable waiting to try and get ASP with the later pick, rather than lose out on Danielson before 17. Amazing that ASP dropped to Detroit where he did.No shit.
Kid was unreal at U20 as a 17 y old, then unreal at U20... But because Adam Boqvist did not set the NHL on fire ASP, then had to drop?
Was so bullish on this kid, and looks like he'll be the steal of the draft. Fact Danielson was picked higher than him by Detroit is pretty funny in itself.
Danielson is looking quite impressive in his own right.No shit.
Kid was unreal at U20 as a 17 y old, then unreal at U20... But because Adam Boqvist did not set the NHL on fire ASP, then had to drop?
Was so bullish on this kid, and looks like he'll be the steal of the draft. Fact Danielson was picked higher than him by Detroit is pretty funny in itself.
He only fell because of his 'lack of size'...Danielson is looking quite impressive in his own right.
But I agree I thought the way ASP dropped was strange. Much worse swedish d-men have been drafted earlier.
From my limited viewings, I really didn't like his play away from the puck, I thought he chased the play a lot. Didn't see efficiency in his defensive game in particular. I'm also not as much a fan of defensemen that need a lot of touches and possession time to be effective, and d-men that like to rush the puck in deep, causing their forwards to switch to cover them frequently. There are obvious exceptions to that; the truly elite guys can make that stuff work at a high level, and maybe ASP becomes that, but I have doubts he will be that as a 25 minutes per game guy. He may be more a top 4-6 offensive specialist that gets favorable minutes and matchups, and a powerplay guy. I think Detroit is a situation where they can use a top 4-6 dman like that because of how their blueline is shaping up with their top guys being excellent matchup guys, but I think a lot of other teams want their bottom 3 guys to be PK d-men. If ASP doesn't hit as a top pairing caliber offensive D, he doesn't fit as nicely into how other teams structure their bluelines, so I can see why he was passed over. For what it is worth, I am a Canucks fan who before the draft preferred Danielson over Willander, and Willander over ASP.He only fell because of his 'lack of size'...
There's room for two offensive defensemen in the top 4.From my limited viewings, I really didn't like his play away from the puck, I thought he chased the play a lot. Didn't see efficiency in his defensive game in particular. I'm also not as much a fan of defensemen that need a lot of touches and possession time to be effective, and d-men that like to rush the puck in deep, causing their forwards to switch to cover them frequently. There are obvious exceptions to that; the truly elite guys can make that stuff work at a high level, and maybe ASP becomes that, but I have doubts he will be that as a 25 minutes per game guy. He may be more a top 4-6 offensive specialist that gets favorable minutes and matchups, and a powerplay guy. I think Detroit is a situation where they can use a top 4-6 dman like that because of how their blueline is shaping up with their top guys being excellent matchup guys, but I think a lot of other teams want their bottom 3 guys to be PK d-men. If ASP doesn't hit as a top pairing caliber offensive D, he doesn't fit as nicely into how other teams structure their bluelines, so I can see why he was passed over. For what it is worth, I am a Canucks fan who before the draft preferred Danielson over Willander, and Willander over ASP.
How dare you.From my limited viewings, I really didn't like his play away from the puck, I thought he chased the play a lot. Didn't see efficiency in his defensive game in particular. I'm also not as much a fan of defensemen that need a lot of touches and possession time to be effective, and d-men that like to rush the puck in deep, causing their forwards to switch to cover them frequently. There are obvious exceptions to that; the truly elite guys can make that stuff work at a high level, and maybe ASP becomes that, but I have doubts he will be that as a 25 minutes per game guy. He may be more a top 4-6 offensive specialist that gets favorable minutes and matchups, and a powerplay guy. I think Detroit is a situation where they can use a top 4-6 dman like that because of how their blueline is shaping up with their top guys being excellent matchup guys, but I think a lot of other teams want their bottom 3 guys to be PK d-men. If ASP doesn't hit as a top pairing caliber offensive D, he doesn't fit as nicely into how other teams structure their bluelines, so I can see why he was passed over. For what it is worth, I am a Canucks fan who before the draft preferred Danielson over Willander, and Willander over ASP.
Tyson Barrie spent 9 NHL seasons playing top pairing minutes...How dare you.
I agree, I think he will have a career in the NHL but he's closer to Barrie than a top pairing guy, in my opinion
I guess you're right, though the success of the teams he played top pairing for says it allTyson Barrie spent 9 NHL seasons playing top pairing minutes...
ASP would probably have to be a Top 3 PMD in the league to be a top pairing guy in Detroit in the next decade, considering his competition is Seider lol.How dare you.
I agree, I think he will have a career in the NHL but he's closer to Barrie than a top pairing guy, in my opinion
ASP would probably have to be a Top 3 PMD in the league to be a top pairing guy in Detroit in the next decade, considering his competition is Seider lol.
I think the ideal situation they hope for is Seider eats 23-25 minutes a night 5 on 5 and PK, getting the more defensive assignments, while ASP gets the 2nd pairing role but is the PP1 QB. Who knows if we ever get there, though.
And the big issue will be, if all these guys pan out, we're probably gonna be sacrificing somebody to the cap 5-7 years down the road. Seider's contract negotiation is gonna be important in setting the tone for Edvinsson/ASP/Wallinder.
There's room for two offensive defensemen in the top 4.
OFD-TWD
TWD-OFD
DFD-TWD
Covers your PP, covers your PK, each of the offensive guys are covered by two-way guys.
In three years Detroit's top 4 could be:
Wallinder - Seider
Edvinsson - ASP
What in tarnation. He was well regarded as the prospect with the most offensive upside this past draft. He is very creative on the blue line as well. He's a mainstay on the PP.ASP is not an offensive D-man. I have no idea where that comes from. He’s a modern quick defenseman who moves the puck well and is excellent in terms of positioning. There’s a reason he led the Swedish WJC team in icetime as a 17 year old in the games that mattered, he’s just an extremely reliable D-man. I don’t think he will ever be much of a scorer as he lacks some creativity/timing on the blue line. I think it’s far more likely he ends up like an Anton Strålman. Much better prospect than Willander imo, better hands, quicker mind.
Yeah stralman is a pretty bad comparison and ASP absolutely is an offensive D manASP is not an offensive D-man. I have no idea where that comes from. He’s a modern quick defenseman who moves the puck well and is excellent in terms of positioning. There’s a reason he led the Swedish WJC team in icetime as a 17 year old in the games that mattered, he’s just an extremely reliable D-man. I don’t think he will ever be much of a scorer as he lacks some creativity/timing on the blue line. I think it’s far more likely he ends up like an Anton Strålman. Much better prospect than Willander imo, better hands, quicker mind.
ill eat my hat if this kid isnt a top 4 dman in the NHL