My guess is they issue a statement saying something like, "We understand the Rangers' frustration that one of their star players was injured in a scrum after the play. The DoPS reviewed the incident and determined a fine was warranted, and we stand behind George Parros and the rest of the department. There are avenues for teams to express their displeasure with certain matters and press releases are not the appropriate venue, and as such we will not be commenting on the matter further." Then they discreetly issue an undisclosed fine to the organization (i.e., not publicly announcing it or disclosing a figure) and move on.
Maybe in the off-season you see Parros "step down" and "assume a different role" while the NHL "examines the processes in place to review incidents at the DoPS" and they make some minor changes. That's about how I see it playing out. The NHL does not want to make this demonstrably worse, but also won't just ignore it for fear of setting that precedent that the teams can openly challenge the league when they feel like it.
JMO. I could also be completely wrong.![]()
Certainly could see the league going that direction. I also agree with your take that the NHL does not want to make this situation worse. I just feel the Rangers are trying to force the leagues hand publicly on the Panarin portion of the incident since the DoPS refused to even comment on that. As it relates to the process for review I think the Rangers can make a pretty strong case for the DoPS failing to do it's job. I might also be completely wrong.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/495f1/495f185fc1f2d2bd459ec9ded3ca2eb67b513d95" alt="laugh :laugh: :laugh:"
Last edited: