Prospect Info: Rangers Prospect Thread (Player Stats/Info in Post #1; Updated 5.24.21)

Status
Not open for further replies.

nyr2k2

Can't Beat Him
Jul 30, 2005
46,162
34,209
Maryland
Think it may be time to pull the plug on hope that he is a prospect.
The last time he did anything objectively good was 17-18 in some U18 international competitions. Otherwise, he has been injured a ton and his play has ranged from mediocre to bad.

The only reason to hold out hope is that he's still 20, and goalies have been known to randomly put it together closer to their mid-20s.

For all the jokes I make at his expense, I do actually root for the kid. Just like any other NYR prospect. Unfortunately I don't see much there (and I have actually watched several of his games to this point).
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bluenote13

RangersFan1994

Registered User
Aug 20, 2019
18,072
14,758
The last time he did anything objectively good was 17-18 in some U18 international competitions. Otherwise, he has been injured a ton and his play has ranged from mediocre to bad.

The only reason to hold out hope is that he's still 20, and goalies have been known to randomly put it together closer to their mid-20s.

For all the jokes I make at his expense, I do actually root for the kid. Just like any other NYR prospect. Unfortunately I don't see much there (and I have actually watched several of his games to this point).


this team scouting is not very good. how do management not notice this at all
 

True Blue

Registered User
Feb 27, 2002
30,092
8,362
Visit site
this team scouting is not very good. how do management not notice this at all
Just look at the awful picks ups from the trash heap....Rooney, Blackwell......how could the scouts have advised on these guys.

And the drafting? I mean forget it. How could they have traded up to draft Miller and Schnieder? Or draft someone defenseman named Lundkvist? Taking Chytil later on in the first? What a mistake.

Same scouts that stupidly suggested to trade for Lindren.

This team's scouting is just not very good at all.
 

Amazing Kreiderman

Registered User
Apr 11, 2011
45,009
40,722
and Lindbom is a goalie (and not a good one) so yes a garbage pick anyway you look at it in the second round

Yes but Lindbom being the highest drafted goalie that year made sense on the day, with how he progressed during the season with a really strong u18 WJC
 

Harbour Dog

Registered User
Jul 16, 2015
10,744
13,934
St. John's
If the Lindbom pick is the final lesson we needed to stop taking goalies that early, then I'm glad we made it.

But I'm sure we'll keep considering goalies in the second round for some unknown reason.

Even Garand, who is a good prospect (and was a borderline okay pick in that range depending on who you ask), was immediately passed off as Canada's starter by a guy taken in the 7th round, about 120 picks later. And it wasn't a surprise.

It would just be nice to stop being one of the first teams to take a goalie every draft. It's a poor strategy.
 

Harbour Dog

Registered User
Jul 16, 2015
10,744
13,934
St. John's
Yes but Lindbom being the highest drafted goalie that year made sense on the day, with how he progressed during the season with a really strong u18 WJC

Meh, I suspect that if you averaged all the team's rankings, Lindbom would have been outside the top3 of goalies.

Annunen, Skarek, and Dostal all immediately come to mind.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bl02

Amazing Kreiderman

Registered User
Apr 11, 2011
45,009
40,722
Meh, I suspect that if you averaged all the team's rankings, Lindbom would have been outside the top3 of goalies.

Annunen, Skarek, and Dostal all immediately come to mind.

Annunen and Dostal were the better goalies IMO that year, but every year you see players climb the rankings late. Kravtsov and Chytil are great examples.

Had we drafted Annunen or Dostal, I still would not have been happy.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Harbour Dog

bl02

Registered User
Jan 13, 2014
33,212
23,694
This organization I feel like has these head scratcher high round goalie picks every handful of years to keep Allaire happy. Remember Lafleur? I think that was his name.
Good memory! Yep Antoine Lafleur. That draft makes me sad. Alexei could have been terrific on Broadway especially since we had decent teams when he would have hit his peak.
 

kovazub94

Enigmatic
Aug 5, 2010
13,325
8,995
I understand that. But there are reasons that trades of a certain type get made and trades that involve nothing but top prospects for top prospects do not.

My point is that NHL teams front offices are scared of losing a trade to the point it makes them trade averse altogether. Obviously the higher the profile - this risk is higher. There are rarely trades of top caliber for top caliber player developed players either, not just prospects.
 

nyr2k2

Can't Beat Him
Jul 30, 2005
46,162
34,209
Maryland
I mean I figured we'd take a goalie and Skarek was my guy. He's not anything great so I can't totally kill the team for picking Lindbum. It's not the player that upsets me, but the position. Although--I don't like putting so much emphasis on international competition.

Garand was a pick much closer to where I'd like to see us take goalies, and was actually a player I liked.

Still, I'd prefer we stick to the 6th and 7th, and the UDFA market.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Harbour Dog

Amazing Kreiderman

Registered User
Apr 11, 2011
45,009
40,722
I mean I figured we'd take a goalie and Skarek was my guy. He's not anything great so I can't totally kill the team for picking Lindbum. It's not the player that upsets me, but the position. Although--I don't like putting so much emphasis on international competition.

Garand was a pick much closer to where I'd like to see us take goalies, and was actually a player I liked.

Still, I'd prefer we stick to the 6th and 7th, and the UDFA market.

Yes, and this is mostly because I feel you have other positions that are much harder to fill late in the draft. Forwards are a premium every year. Use your high picks on those unless there is a defenseman that really stands out. Defensemen you can usually get in the 2nd and 3rd round. Goalies shouldn't go before the 5th round IMO but I can live with a 4th rounder being used for one.

2nd round pick? Never.
 
  • Like
Reactions: nyr2k2

nyr2k2

Can't Beat Him
Jul 30, 2005
46,162
34,209
Maryland
Yes, and this is mostly because I feel you have other positions that are much harder to fill late in the draft. Forwards are a premium every year. Use your high picks on those unless there is a defenseman that really stands out. Defensemen you can usually get in the 2nd and 3rd round. Goalies shouldn't go before the 5th round IMO but I can live with a 4th rounder being used for one.

2nd round pick? Never.
Right. Just look at our fifth round the past few drafts--Berard, Vierling, Pajuniemi, Gettinger. I think there's a good chance at least one of those guys becomes an NHL regular and a reasonable chance two or more make it. If any of them were to really pan out in the "home run" sense? At least for the first three on that list, they'd be more valuable than a goalie who panned out similarly. IMO, anyway.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Amazing Kreiderman

Amazing Kreiderman

Registered User
Apr 11, 2011
45,009
40,722
Right. Just look at our fifth round the past few drafts--Berard, Vierling, Pajuniemi, Gettinger. I think there's a good chance at least one of those guys becomes an NHL regular and a reasonable chance two or more make it. If any of them were to really pan out in the "home run" sense? At least for the first three on that list, they'd be more valuable than a goalie who panned out similarly. IMO, anyway.

And even if you cannot find a starting goalie, you trade for one. Their value on the trade market is nothing compared to other positions
 
  • Like
Reactions: nyr2k2

True Blue

Registered User
Feb 27, 2002
30,092
8,362
Visit site
This organization I feel like has these head scratcher high round goalie picks every handful of years to keep Allaire happy. Remember Lafleur? I think that was his name.
Don't think that it has to do with keeping Allaire happy. Would he have been my choice that year? No. But he was putting up good numbers.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SnowblindNYR

True Blue

Registered User
Feb 27, 2002
30,092
8,362
Visit site
My point is that NHL teams front offices are scared of losing a trade to the point it makes them trade averse altogether. Obviously the higher the profile - this risk is higher. There are rarely trades of top caliber for top caliber player developed players either, not just prospects.
I can see that. Or when made, usually disgruntled stars for disgruntled stars
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad