True Blue
Registered User
Think it may be time to pull the plug on hope that he is a prospect.Lindbum, hot off his astonishing 18-save shutout, allowed 4 goals on 13 shots and was pulled after the first period.
Think it may be time to pull the plug on hope that he is a prospect.Lindbum, hot off his astonishing 18-save shutout, allowed 4 goals on 13 shots and was pulled after the first period.
The last time he did anything objectively good was 17-18 in some U18 international competitions. Otherwise, he has been injured a ton and his play has ranged from mediocre to bad.Think it may be time to pull the plug on hope that he is a prospect.
What a garbage pick. And all of us knew it at the time too.Think it may be time to pull the plug on hope that he is a prospect.
The last time he did anything objectively good was 17-18 in some U18 international competitions. Otherwise, he has been injured a ton and his play has ranged from mediocre to bad.
The only reason to hold out hope is that he's still 20, and goalies have been known to randomly put it together closer to their mid-20s.
For all the jokes I make at his expense, I do actually root for the kid. Just like any other NYR prospect. Unfortunately I don't see much there (and I have actually watched several of his games to this point).
Disagree. All of us were against a goalie being picked. There is a difference.What a garbage pick. And all of us knew it at the time too.
Just look at the awful picks ups from the trash heap....Rooney, Blackwell......how could the scouts have advised on these guys.this team scouting is not very good. how do management not notice this at all
What a garbage pick. And all of us knew it at the time too.
Same thing. Garbage to pick a goalie at that spot and obviously he is a garbage prospect. same crapDisagree. All of us were against a goalie being picked. There is a difference.
and Lindbom is a goalie (and not a good one) so yes a garbage pick anyway you look at it in the second roundPicking a goalie was the real crime, not necessarily picking Lindbom
and Lindbom is a goalie (and not a good one) so yes a garbage pick anyway you look at it in the second round
Yes but Lindbom being the highest drafted goalie that year made sense on the day, with how he progressed during the season with a really strong u18 WJC
Think it may be time to pull the plug on hope that he is a prospect.
Meh, I suspect that if you averaged all the team's rankings, Lindbom would have been outside the top3 of goalies.
Annunen, Skarek, and Dostal all immediately come to mind.
Good memory! Yep Antoine Lafleur. That draft makes me sad. Alexei could have been terrific on Broadway especially since we had decent teams when he would have hit his peak.This organization I feel like has these head scratcher high round goalie picks every handful of years to keep Allaire happy. Remember Lafleur? I think that was his name.
I understand that. But there are reasons that trades of a certain type get made and trades that involve nothing but top prospects for top prospects do not.
I mean I figured we'd take a goalie and Skarek was my guy. He's not anything great so I can't totally kill the team for picking Lindbum. It's not the player that upsets me, but the position. Although--I don't like putting so much emphasis on international competition.
Garand was a pick much closer to where I'd like to see us take goalies, and was actually a player I liked.
Still, I'd prefer we stick to the 6th and 7th, and the UDFA market.
Right. Just look at our fifth round the past few drafts--Berard, Vierling, Pajuniemi, Gettinger. I think there's a good chance at least one of those guys becomes an NHL regular and a reasonable chance two or more make it. If any of them were to really pan out in the "home run" sense? At least for the first three on that list, they'd be more valuable than a goalie who panned out similarly. IMO, anyway.Yes, and this is mostly because I feel you have other positions that are much harder to fill late in the draft. Forwards are a premium every year. Use your high picks on those unless there is a defenseman that really stands out. Defensemen you can usually get in the 2nd and 3rd round. Goalies shouldn't go before the 5th round IMO but I can live with a 4th rounder being used for one.
2nd round pick? Never.
Right. Just look at our fifth round the past few drafts--Berard, Vierling, Pajuniemi, Gettinger. I think there's a good chance at least one of those guys becomes an NHL regular and a reasonable chance two or more make it. If any of them were to really pan out in the "home run" sense? At least for the first three on that list, they'd be more valuable than a goalie who panned out similarly. IMO, anyway.
If they didn’t learn the lesson after Brandon Halverson then I don’t know why they’d learn it nowIf the Lindbom pick is the final lesson we needed to stop taking goalies that early, then I'm glad we made it.
That may be. But outside the top-5, I would grab a Wallstedt this year and not look back.Same thing. Garbage to pick a goalie at that spot and obviously he is a garbage prospect. same crap
Don't think that it has to do with keeping Allaire happy. Would he have been my choice that year? No. But he was putting up good numbers.This organization I feel like has these head scratcher high round goalie picks every handful of years to keep Allaire happy. Remember Lafleur? I think that was his name.
That may be. But outside the top-5, I would grab a Wallstedt this year and not look back.
I can see that. Or when made, usually disgruntled stars for disgruntled starsMy point is that NHL teams front offices are scared of losing a trade to the point it makes them trade averse altogether. Obviously the higher the profile - this risk is higher. There are rarely trades of top caliber for top caliber player developed players either, not just prospects.