Rongomania
Registered User
Lundkvist is as good of a prospect as Miller, if not better, but you do you.
Goodness, some really bad takes in this thread...
We are so lucky to have BOTH .
Lundkvist is as good of a prospect as Miller, if not better, but you do you.
Goodness, some really bad takes in this thread...
Let’s even say Keane is nothing more than a third pairing defenseman. Is that a bad thing for a fourth round pick?
I don’t know about anyone else, but if we’re getting depth from lower picks, on top of major contributions from our high picks, that’s fantastic.
As for Lundkvist, the kid is definitely top four potential. Maybe not the flashiest top 4, or a guy who catches your eye with one particular skill or trait, but his upside is definitely second pairing.
A 3rd pairing defenseman from a 2nd round pick is pretty much a very good pick. Let alone a 4th
He thinks every scrub is a top half player whose value is showing gifs but without being able to project actual value.
Dirty little secret: most of these guys aren’t making the show. The easy choice is that most of these cats don’t make it.
As much as I like Joey Keane., I’ll be amazed that he’s more than a 3rd pair D unless expansion allows him a deeper role.
As much as I like Nils Lundkvist, is he ever breaking top 4? He would have a chance once Staal goes away, but Miller is a more likely option and Sean Day is a better 3rd pair option(and I know the Rangers staff have Day on their sh*tlist for a reason beyond actually watching him play. )
He’s got some great tools to with. Big thick kid who has pretty good balance and skating. rIghty. Nice pick in the 4thround I thinkHe doesn't look old enough to get into the Junior Prom.
Yeah, but can he get into Junior Prom with that?He’s got some great tools to with. Big thick kid who has pretty good balance and skating. rIghty. Nice pick in the 4thround I think
Nils will be top 4. He is very good.Careful now. Your bias is showing.
Who are you and why do you pretend to A) think you know me B) know anything about Swedish hockey?He thinks every scrub is a top half player whose value is showing gifs but without being able to project actual value.
Dirty little secret: most of these guys aren’t making the show. The easy choice is that most of these cats don’t make it.
As much as I like Joey Keane., I’ll be amazed that he’s more than a 3rd pair D unless expansion allows him a deeper role.
As much as I like Nils Lundkvist, is he ever breaking top 4? He would have a chance once Staal goes away, but Miller is a more likely option and Sean Day is a better 3rd pair option(and I know the Rangers staff have Day on their sh*tlist for a reason beyond actually watching him play. )
I’ve watched every single Luleå game this season, Lundkvist has only played RD. He does start shifts at LD in the OZone at times.Watch a game and then tell me Lundkvist doesn’t play on his off hand at times that aren’t infrequent.
I’ve watched every single Luleå game this season, Lundkvist has only played RD. He does start shifts at LD in the OZone at times.
Yes, thought that was self explanatory haha. He’a a pure RDOffensive zone LD start shifts meant to set up his shot if opportunity arises. He goes back to RD on the same shifts if it doesn’t work.
Who are you and why do you pretend to A) think you know me B) know anything about Swedish hockey?
Nils Lundkvist is currently deployed in a top pairing role in the SHL which is the 3rd best league in the world.
HockeyAllsvenskan is definitely a better league then ECHL and it’s not very close either.
Wasn't PB a big proponent of Sjalin?
He was doomed from the get-go.