Home scoring is always a thing in sports, its entirely believeable, no tinfoil neededNot to put on a tinfoil hat, but this isn't the first time I've noticed something similar. I think data in Tampa is a bit friendly towards home scoring chances.
A bit of arena bias is not out of the ordinary. If you bring up Hank's career numbers on EH and turn off venue adjustment, his GSAx goes up by 9 goals (which isn't nothing for a normal goalie -- it's nothing for Hank) because MSG notoriously counts shots as slightly closer to the net then they are.
Unfortunately Stamkos had bad wifi cause the royal road was used on their only goal.The league is at a 60-year high for shot attempts.
That passing revolution ended with a quick Google search.
I just find it hilarious that MSG has a goaltending bias in their data.Home scoring is always a thing in sports, its entirely believeable, no tinfoil needed
The rangers problem is they pass and shoot but they don't fight for rebounds. Would be awesome if gallant sat the team down and showed them some video of Patric Hornqvist. The rangers get a lot of shots and some go in but so many goals these days are on rebounds and tips. The rangers need to get in on that trend.Out of all the bullshit tonight, I think the most frustrated play was the 2 v 1 in OT with Fox (and Zibs I think). The D-man is playing the middle and Fox skates in so close to Vasi that he's breathing on him, but decides to pass for such a bad angle shot. I 100% thought that Fox was going to shoot it. I love Fox, but sometimes I wish he had some Makar in him man. We have too many passers on this team and when the score is close, for us, with out luck, fancy isn't the way to go.
It's so mind-blowing that they took Kakko's assist away and made it unassisted. They are always extremely so assist happy in this league where a defenseman can put the puck into his own net and they would still give out 2 assists.
Hopefully the NHL changes that. Give the f***ing kid his damn points.
Regarding Fils attempt,it isn't, he was way too close to him when he started his move and stevie wonder could have saw it coming. Fil is playing well but he is a head scratcher to put in a shootoutTo be fair, on many goalies that's an easy tuck in. It was a nice move and a better response by the goalie. It happens.
Same. They played great but just not enough finish. Tampa's goalie was big today. Both goalies played great.
I noticed we only scored one goal and we played Brodzinski too much....so maybe.Be honest, did anyone even notice Laf was scratched?
Nah. Plenty of goalies would have bit on the forehand and left some room around the right pad.Regarding Fils attempt,it isn't, he was way too close to him when he started his move and stevie wonder could have saw it coming. Fil is playing well but he is a head scratcher to put in a shootout
Buchnevich wasn't strong enough but he didn't fold up like paper. Kravtsov does.Buchnevich
..basically the exact same thing when he got here.
That’s fair but at the same time I’ve heard his name called just as much in games he’s been dressed which was more my pointI noticed we only scored one goal and we played Brodzinski too much....so maybe.
In this place? No we need to see the points or everyone and their mother's will continue to call him a bust.Well it was clearly an unassisted goal so I am not sure why they would change it. This is the exact same Laf argument all over again. Who cares if they get a point on their record? Kakko made a good play behind the net there. We can all see it. I don’t need to read the box score to know if he played a good game or not based on if he was credited with an assist.
Yes.Be honest, did anyone even notice Laf was scratched?
Why do you care what the mouth breathers on the main boards think/say? If he was putting up points they’d find some other reason to hate on him.In this place? No we need to see the points or everyone and their mother's will continue to call him a bust.
Unfortunately, i was talking about half of this boardWhy do you care what the mouth breathers on the main boards think/say? If he was putting up points they’d find some other reason to hate on him.
Ok. Add them to that group too.Unfortunately, i was talking about half of this board![]()
Sorry buddy but you are showing your negative outlook or inability to watch a hockey game. There was one stretch where Tampa did not have a shot for something like 8 minutes. The Rangers controlled the play for stretches during the game and really played a solid game. Both goalies played unreal. So if you want to kill the Rangers you are both statistically wrong and the eye ball test also negates your point. I would just as easily say the Rangers could have won that game 8-1 as much as Tampa did given they had 3 breakaways, multiple missed wide open sides or nets( Blais sticks out as one) and basically matched Tampa is shots.I was there 5 rows behind the bench
It could’ve easily been an 8-1 Tampa win
Easily