LetsGoRangers2021
Registered User
- Jan 25, 2021
- 283
- 220
Fire Gallant!
He hasn’t played the kids at all yet! Off with his head.
Fire Gallant!
That’s fine, Danault is going to be an anchor if he gets anything like what he supposedly wants.probably cannot afford UFAs like Hyman, Danault, less trendy guys maybe like Goodrow or Paquette
at D they could look at UFAs like Merrill or Forbert or aim higher in trade
dont want long deals for role players ...
I've noticed Devils fans have been particularly salty over us hiring him. I'm sure it has nothing to do with them settling for Ruff, lmao.
He was the best available, but reading all the praise and how well he is predicted to fit with this org has me borderline excited.....
Ya know what? I'm gonna do it! I'm gonna let myself be excited! Wooo, go me! =)
This is gonna be a disaster.
Look at the bright side. Its only hockey.Okay, Debbie Downer. Who would you have hired? Scotty Bowman?
What’s the reasoning on this?This is gonna be a disaster.
Why? He's been pretty successful over the last few years. What could you possibly be objecting to at this point?This is gonna be a disaster.
Yeah…I’ll sign up for another ECF and SCF appearance with the hope our luck is more fortunate this time around.Gallant has been every bit as successful as that fellow before Quinn.
Pinching myself every hour....this has actually happened . Thank you Las Vegas. I think a lot of us will enjoy a fast moving young hockey club full of piss and vinegar . Buckle up Ranger fans !
Okay, Debbie Downer. Who would you have hired? Scotty Bowman?
not gonna lie i have that fear. i hope it works out obviously. i think theres reasons to believe gallant could do well, but its fair to say there's a large degree of uncertainty with him as well. and not just him, there's also the detonation of the entire front office thats taken place. who knows what the hell the plan is there.
a few months ago we by all appearances had literally everything going for us. youngest team in the league making a legit push for a playoff spot in an extremely challenging year with an extremely tough division to win a spot in. we had a highly respected front office, organizational continuity, an extremely talented roster that had a few known and easy to address areas to improve on that would round us into a legit contender. we had elite, high end kids. the only questions we really had were if quinn was the guy or not and what prospects would emerge to what level / what the final picture would look like. i'm far from sure quinn was it, but i also strongly believe he wasn't given a chance to answer that either way. and i personally think he should have been given next year, if for nothing else than to keep some consistency in the org and one less thing on drury's plate as he got his feet under him as a gm filling out front office roles and establishing his culture and vision. i think quinn deserved a more complete 4 line roster, time with year 2 of laf - its not like we've been a bottom feeder with him. even if drury went into it with the thought that he'd pull the trigger by midseason if we didn't take off, thats half a season he'd have had to figure out the next move beyond quinn. half a season and a summer to get a few more voices in the front office to evaluate/discuss with. and as you mentioned, gallant isn't scotty bowman coming in. i like him, think he was as good as we could have done with the names thrown around, but its not like if we missed on him by keeping quinn a few more months if thats what it ended up being there wouldn't be comparable options out there. and in those cases drury would have had far more time to evaluate. because while we'll never know exactly what drury's thoughts were throughout, there's no way to not view the way we sort of dragged our feet to see what else might come onto the market before hiring gallant and not feel like we basically went 'fk it you'll have to do".
since the wilson incident we've become a joke around the league with that letter - something that will follow our guys on the ice for years - and god only knows in what ways it'll haunt us in officiating / league office decisions. our entire front office has been gutted. our coaching staff axed.
but for me that feeling is less to do with gallant specifically and everything to do with where we are as an organization today versus where i imagined us being today a year ago. we just can't have nice things can we
That's more of a fear that things go wrong with the Rangers, which admittedly they do. It doesn't have to do with Gallant. As far as who I'd want to coach the Rangers, I couldn't name you seven guys, currently employed or not, that I'd want over Gallant.