Make it now 1-12 when they don't score the 1st goal. Doesn't matter that they had the lead. They don't score first - They lose.
Make it now 1-12 when they don't score the 1st goal. Doesn't matter that they had the lead. They don't score first - They lose.
.500 again, the very essence of mediocrity - when does this stop?
Lundqvist is 8-11 on the season - gross
The Rangers' first regulation loss when leading after 2 periods in 95 games - that's gone now
Thank god we beat that powerhouse panthers team.
Rangers are pathetic. Overhaul.
Bruins were the better team, but Lundqvist has to stop that unscreened point shot from Chara.
Too many games where the Rangers could have at least gotten a point by forcing overtime but didn't because of unlucky bounces and bad goals given up.
This board is incredibly hyperbole and knee-jerk, haha.
A bad game today. Hank, Nash and McDonagh played okay. Falk stood up to Lucic nicely. Every else very quiet. Did we create a good chance after scoring our 2nd? Too little desire and too many sloppy plays. I really HATE losing to this team.
LOL.
Top 6 (top 9?) was just pathetic outside of Nash who played a pretty strong game and had some god chances.
D was woeful outside of McD (Stralman was ok).
PP was just a joke, 3 without a single shot? Unacceptable.
Lundqvist was good but needs to stop that Chara shot. As someone said in the GDT, it wasn't a soft goal but I'd like Henrik Lundqvist to stop those.
They'd better bring the fire against the Nucks because that was woeful today
Good: Nash scoring, McDonagh looking like his offense is developing, Hank for 48 minutes or so
Bad: Every player on the entire team after the first player. Nothing pisses me off more than complacency.
Pyatt: Pyatt, Callahan, Girardi, Lundqvist on the 3rd goal, and Julien's incessant whining.
In fact, Lundqvist's 3rd goal was so bad that I almost feel like it deserves it's own section of something lower than Pyatt. I didn't think that was possible, quite frankly.
The lack of scoring pisses me off. But I can tolerate it when the team plays hard. I can't tolerate it when the team just decides the game is over and ****ing sleepwalks through the last two periods. They played 20 minutes of hockey today and 40 minutes of ********. I guess Hank decided that he just didn't care anymore at the end and joined the other idiots in getting complacent. This was a team loss, through and through, if I ever saw one. One of the more embarrassing losses you'll see, IMHO.
Callahan is so overrated. Tired of this guy not getting any flak for not coming up big in the big moments and being a real leader. Never scores in the playoffs, never scores big goals or makes big plays when we need him and his hockey IQ offensively is just blah.
He's just been ****.
Bruins were the better team, but Lundqvist has to stop that unscreened point shot from Chara.
Too many games where the Rangers could have at least gotten a point by forcing overtime but didn't because of unlucky bounces and bad goals given up.
hank just knows we suck and has a ton of pressure on his shoulders. maybe if we scored more often he wouldnt need to be perfectI'm not trying to say Lundqvist is looking bad. He's just not lucky. It seems like every time he's in net there's a goal deflecting off of one of his D man--today it was G, another game it was Stralman.
The team seems to play a tighter more put together game with Talbot in net. I don't get it, but this is the way it seems to me. The D sucks playing in front of Hank.
Idiots. ****ing all of them. Idiots.
How long are we going to pretend this being the worst Rangers team in years doesn't coincide with the premature firing of Torts?
No, we don't. Rangers can't beat good teams. Who was the last good team the Rangers beat?
The players who have been labeled our "leaders" have been terrible. Callahan, Richards, Girardi, Staal, Lundqvist...Stepan was also invisible.
Only players who stood out positively today were Nash and McDonagh.